DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Are glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis recommendations suffi cient to determine antiosteoporotic treatment for patients with rheumatoid arthritis?

  • Lee, Joo-Hyun (Department of Internal Medicine, Inje University Ilsan Paik Hospital) ;
  • Cho, Soo-Kyung (Department of Rheumatology, Hanyang University Hospital for Rheumatic Diseases) ;
  • Han, Minkyung (Department of Rheumatology, Hanyang University Hospital for Rheumatic Diseases) ;
  • Kim, Dam (Department of Rheumatology, Hanyang University Hospital for Rheumatic Diseases) ;
  • Bae, Sang-Cheol (Department of Rheumatology, Hanyang University Hospital for Rheumatic Diseases) ;
  • Sung, Yoon-Kyoung (Department of Rheumatology, Hanyang University Hospital for Rheumatic Diseases)
  • 투고 : 2013.03.30
  • 심사 : 2013.09.04
  • 발행 : 2014.07.01

초록

Background/Aims: We investigated diff erences in identifying candidates for antiosteoporotic treatment in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients according to two available clinical guidelines. Methods: We prospectively enrolled 100 female patients aged 50 years or older with RA who visited Hanyang University Hospital for periodic examinations between April 2011 and August 2011. We applied the glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis (GIOP) recommendations and the National Osteoporosis Foundation (NOF) guidelines to RA patients and examined agreement between the guidelines for identifying candidates for antiosteoporotic treatment. We also analyzed the impact of screening vertebral fractures (VFs) in determining the treatment of osteoporosis in RA patients. Results: The 57 patients taking glucocorticoids were classifi ed into high-risk (n = 23), medium-risk (n = 16), and low-risk (n = 18) groups according to the GIOP recommendations. Based on the NOF guidelines, 36 of 57 patients were candidates for antiosteoporotic treatment and the agreement between two guidelines was high (${\kappa}$ = 0.76). Two of the 18 patients in the low-risk group and 19 of 43 patients not eligible per the GIOP recommendations were classifi ed as candidates for antiosteoporotic treatment by the NOF guidelines. Conclusions: In determining antiosteoporotic treatment for RA patients, using only the GIOP recommendations is insuffi cient. Application of the NOF guidelines in patients not eligible for or classifi ed into the low-risk group per the GIOP recommendations and screening for VFs may be helpful in deciding on antiosteoporotic treatment in RA patients.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Roux C. Osteoporosis in inf lammatory joint diseases. Osteoporos Int 2011;22:421-433. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-010-1319-x
  2. van Staa TP, Geusens P, Bijlsma JW, Leuf kens HG, Cooper C. Clinical assessment of the long-term risk of fracture in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 2006;54:3104-3112. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.22117
  3. Kanis JA, Oden A, Johansson H, Borgstrom F, Strom O, McCloskey E. FRAX and its app lications to clinical practice. Bone 2009;44:734-743. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bone.2009.01.373
  4. Compston J. Management of glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis. Nat Rev Rheumatol 2010;6:82-88. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrrheum.2009.259
  5. Curtis JR, Westfall AO, Allison JJ, et al. Longitudinal patterns in the prevention of osteoporosis in glucocorticoid- treated patients. Arthritis Rheum 2005;52:2485-2494. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.21194
  6. Watts NB, Lewiecki EM, Miller PD, Baim S. National Osteoporosis Foundation 2008 Clinician's Guide to Prevention and Treatment of Osteoporosis and the World Health Organization Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX): what they mean to the bone densitometrist and bone technologist. J Clin Densitom 2008;11:473-477. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocd.2008.04.003
  7. Grossman JM, Gordon R, Ranganath VK, et al. American College of Rheumatology 2010 recommendations for the prevention and treatment of glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2010;62:1515-1526. https://doi.org/10.1002/acr.20295
  8. Kanis JA, Johansson H, Oden A, McCloskey EV. Guidance for the adjustment of FRAX according to the dose of glucocorticoids. Osteoporos Int 2011;22:809-816. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-010-1524-7
  9. Genant HK, Wu CY, van Kuijk C, Nevitt MC. Vertebral fracture assessment using a semiquantitative technique. J Bone Miner Res 1993;8:1137-1148.
  10. Compston JE. Emerging consensus on prevention and treatment of glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis. Curr Rheumatol Rep 2007;9:78-84. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11926-007-0026-x
  11. Ghazi M, Kolta S, Briot K, Fechtenbaum J, Paternotte S, Roux C. Prevalence of vertebral fractures in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: revisiting the role of glucocorticoids. Osteoporos Int 2012;23:581-587. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-011-1584-3
  12. Spector TD, Hall GM, McCloskey EV, Kanis JA. Risk of vertebral fracture in women with rheumatoid arthritis. BMJ 1993;306:558. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.306.6877.558
  13. Peel NF, Moore DJ, Barrington NA, Bax DE, Eastell R. Risk of vertebral fracture and relationship to bone mineral density in steroid treated rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 1995;54:801-806. https://doi.org/10.1136/ard.54.10.801
  14. Klotzbuecher CM, Ross PD, Landsman PB, Abbott TA 3rd, Berger M. Patients with prior fractures have an increased risk of future fractures: a summary of the literature and statistical synthesis. J Bone Miner Res 2000;15:721-739.

피인용 문헌

  1. Proper time to initiate antiosteoporotic treatment in rheumatoid arthritis with or without glucocorticoid use vol.29, pp.4, 2014, https://doi.org/10.3904/kjim.2014.29.4.434
  2. Risk Factors of Osteoporosis in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients; Glucocorticoid, Inactivity, or Nutrient Deficiencies vol.24, pp.2, 2014, https://doi.org/10.4078/jrd.2017.24.2.63
  3. Compliance and persistence with oral bisphosphonates for the treatment of osteoporosis in female patients with rheumatoid arthritis vol.18, pp.None, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-017-1514-4
  4. Effects of glucocorticoids on osteoporosis in rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis vol.31, pp.8, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-020-05360-w