참고문헌
- AAAS (American Association for the Advancement of Science). (1993). Benchmarks for science literacy. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
- Bell, R. L., & Lederman, N. G. (2003). Understandings of the nature of science and decision making on science and technology based issues. Science Eduation, 87(3), 352-377.
- Cho, H., Kim, H., Yoon, H., & Lee, K. (2011). Theory and application of science education. Seoul: Kyoyookbook Publication Co.
- Choe, I. (2005). A study on modelling readability formulas for reading instruction system. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 22(3), 213-232. https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2005.22.3.213
- Chung, Y., & Choi, J. (2007). An assessment of the scientific literacy of secondary school students. Journal of the Korea Association for Science Education, 27(1), 9-17.
- Chung, Y., & Lee, J. (2010). The Scientific Literacy of Secondary School Students by TBSL(Test of Basic Scientific Literacy) and SLT(Scientific Literacy Test). Journal of the Research Institute of Curriculum Instruction, 14(3), 669-680. https://doi.org/10.24231/rici.2010.14.3.669
- DeBoer, G. E. (2000). Scientific literacy: Another look at its historical and contemporary meanings and its relationship to science education reform. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(6), 582-601. https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-2736(200008)37:6<582::AID-TEA5>3.0.CO;2-L
- Elliott, P. (2006). Reviewing newspaper articles as a technique for enhancing the scientific literacy of student-teachers. International Jouran of Science Education, 28(11), 1245-1265. https://doi.org/10.1080/10670560500438420
- Gao, L., Kim, E., Moon, G., Kim, S., & Krajcik, J. (2012). Exploration of Science Teachers' Informal Mentoring Experience in their First Years and their Professional Development. Journal of the Research Institute of Curriculum Instruction, 16(2), 517-537. https://doi.org/10.24231/rici.2012.16.2.517
- Giere, R. N., Bickle, J., & Mauldin, R. F. (2006). Understanding scientific reasoning. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
- Hacking, I. (1983). Representing and Intervening. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
- Hogan, K., & Maglienti, M. (2001). Comparing the epistemological underpinning of students'and scientists' reasoning about conclusions. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(6), 663-687. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.1025
- Hong, S., & Woo, A. (2009). An assessment of the scientific literacy and pseudoscience belief of high school and university students. Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 9(3), 331-346.
- Korpan, C. A., Bisanz, G. L., Bisanz, J., & Henderson, J. M. (1997). Assessing literacy in science: evaluation of scientific news briefs, Science Education, 81(5), 515-532. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(199709)81:5<515::AID-SCE2>3.0.CO;2-D
- Lee, M. (2009). Toward to the definition of 'Scientific Literacy'. Journal of the Korean Society of Elementary Science Education, 28(4), 487-494.
- Lee, M., & Kim, J. (2004). An international comparative study of science curriculum. Journal of the Korea Association for Science Education, 24(6), 1082-1093.
- McClune, B., & Jarman, R. (2010). Critical reading of science-based news reports: Establishing a knowledge, skills and attitudes framework. International Journal of Science Education, 32(6), 727-752. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690902777402
- Millar, R. (2006). Twenty first century science: Insights from the design and implementation of a scientific literacy approach in school science. International Journal of Science Education, 28(13), 1499-1521. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690600718344
- Millar, R., & Osborne, J. (1998). Beyond 2000: Science education for the future. London: King's College London.
- MEST (Ministry of Education, Science, & Technology). (2011). Science curriculum. MEST Notification No. 2011-361, Supplement 9.
- National Research Council (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
- National Research Council (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: Practice, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
- National Science Teacher Association (1982). Science, technology, society: Science education for the 1980's. Washington, DC: national Science Teachers Association.
- Norris, S., & Phillips, L. (1994). Interpreting pragmatic meaning when reading popular reports of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31, 947-967. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660310909
- Norris, S., & Phillips, L. (2003). How literacy in its fundamental sense is central to scientific literacy. Science Education, 87(2), 224-240. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10066
- Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) (2009). PISA 2009 assessment framework-Key competencies in reading, mathematics and science. Paris: Author.
- Park, J. (1998). The role of deductive reasoning in scientific activities. Journal of the Korea Association for Science Education, 18(1), 1-17.
- Phillips, L. M., & Norris, S. P. (1999). Interpreting popular reports of science. What happens when the reader's world meets the world on paper? International Journal of Science Education, 21(3), 317-327. https://doi.org/10.1080/095006999290723
- Ratcliffe, M. (1999). Evaluation of abilities in interpreting media reports of scientific research. International Journal of Science Education, 21(10), 1085-1099. https://doi.org/10.1080/095006999290200
- Ryu, H., & Choi, K. (2010). Perception survey on characteristics of scientific literacy for global science-technolodgy-society for secondary school students. Journal of the Korea Association for Science Education, 30(6), 850-869.
- Shin, D., & Ro, K. (2002). Korea students' achievement in scientific literacy. Journal of the Korea Association for Science Education, 22(1), 76-92.