Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences

한국수산과학회 (The Korean Society of Fisheries and Aquatic Science)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Target Strength Measurements of Live Golden Cuttlefish Sepia esculenta at 70 and 120 kHz

  • Lee, Dae-Jae (Division of Marine Production System Management, Pukyong National University) ;
  • Demer, David A. (Southwest Fisheries Science Center, National Marine Fisheries Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration)
  • 투고 : 2014.05.13
  • 심사 : 2014.06.16
  • 발행 : 2014.09.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Cuttlefish Sepia esculenta are commercially important in Korea. Assessments of their biomass currently depend on fishery-landings data, which may be biased. Towards fishery-independent acoustic surveys of cuttlefish, target strength (TS) measurements at 70 and 120 kHz were made of 23 live cuttlefish, in early May 2010. The fish were caught by traps in the inshore waters around Geojedo, Korea. The TS were measured using split-beam echosounders (Simrad ES60 and EY500, respectively). The cuttlefish mantle lengths (L) ranged from 15.6 to 23.5 cm (mean L=17.8 cm) and their masses (W) ranged from 335 to 1020 g (mean W=556.1 g). Their mean TS values at 70 and 120 kHz were -33.01 dB (std=1.39 dB) and -31.76 dB (std=2.15 dB), respectively. The mean TS at 70 kHz was 0.17 dB higher than the TS-length relationship resulting from a least-squares fit to the data ($TS=24.67{\log}_{10}L(cm)-64.03$, $r^2$ = 0.52, N=23). The mean TS at 120 kHz was 0.45 dB higher than the fitted TS-length relationship ($TS=40.59{\log}_{10}L(cm)-82.96$, $r^2$ = 0.58, N=23). The differences between the mean TS values and an equation regressed from all of the TS measurements at both frequencies ($TS=24.92{\log}_{10}L(cm)-4.92{\log}_{10}{\lambda}(m)-22.82$, $r^2$ = 0.86, N=46) was 0.22 dB at 70 kHz and 0.31 dB at 120 kHz, respectively.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Chen Y, Cadman J, Zhou S and Li Q. 2011. Computer-aided design and fabrication of bio-mimetic materials and scaffold micro-structures. Advanc Mater Res 213, 628-632. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.213.628
  2. Conti SG and Demer DA. 2003. Wide-bandwidth acoustical characterization of anchovy and sardine from reverberation measurements in an echoic tank. ICES J Mar Sci 60, 617-624. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1054-3139(03)00056-0
  3. Demer DA and Martin LV. 1995. Zooplankton target strength: Volumetric or areal depenpence? J Acoust Soc Am 98, 1111-1118. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.413609
  4. Denton EJ and Gilpin-Brown JB. 1961. The buoyancy of the cuttlefish, Sepia officinalis (L.). J Mar Bio Ass UK 41, 319-342. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0025315400023948
  5. Denton EJ, Gilpin-Brown JB and Howarth JV. 1961. The osmotic mechanism of the cuttlebone. J Mar Bio Ass UK 41, 351-364. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0025315400023961
  6. Denton EJ and Taylor DW. 1964. The composition of gas in the chambers of the cuttlebone of Sepia officinalis. J Mar Bio Ass UK 44, 203-207. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0025315400024747
  7. Foote KG. 1985. Rather-high-frequency sound scattering by swimbladdered fish. J Acoust Soc Am 78, 688-700. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.392438
  8. Foote KG. 2012. Range compensation for backscattering measurements in the difference frequency nearfield of a parametric sonar. J Acoust Soc Am 131, 3698-3709. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.3688505
  9. Goddard GC and Welsby VG. 1986. The acoustic target strength of live fish. J Cons Int Explor Mer 42, 197-211. https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/42.3.197
  10. Goolish EM. 1992. Swimmbladder function and buoyancy regulation in the killifish Fundulus heterochtus. J exp Biol 166, 61-81.
  11. Horne JK, Walline PD and Jech JM. 2000. Comparing acoustic model predictions to in situ backscatter measurements of fish with dualchambered swimbladders. J Fish Boil 57, 1105-1121. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8649.2000.tb00474.x
  12. Huang K and Clay CS. 1980. Backscattering cross sections of live fish: PDF and aspect. J Acoust Soc Am 67, 795-802. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.383954
  13. Kang D, Mukai T, Iida K, Hwang DJ and Myoung JK. 2005. The influence of tilt angle on the acoustic target strength of the Japanese common squid (Todarodes pacificus). ICES J Mar Sci 62, 779-789. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icesjms.2005.02.002
  14. Kawabata A. 2005. Target strength measurements of suspended live ommastrephid squid, Todarodes pacificus, and its application in density estimations. Fish Sci 71, 63-72. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1444-2906.2005.00931.x
  15. KOSTAT (Statistics Korea). 2014. Agriculture & Fishery, Fishery Products. http://kostat.go.kr/portal/korea/kor_ki/1/1/index.action.2014.02.015.
  16. Lee DJ, Kim JK and Shin HH. 1998. Investigations of the potential fisheries resources in the southern waters of Korea (in Korean with English abstract). Bull Korean Soc Fish Technol 34, 241-258.
  17. Lee DJ. 2006. Target strength measurements of black rockfish, goldeye rockfish and black scraper using a 70-kHz split beam echo sounder (in Japanese with English abstract). Nippon Suisan Gakkaishi 72, 644-650. https://doi.org/10.2331/suisan.72.644
  18. Love RH. 1969. An empirical equation for the determination of the maximum side-aspect target strength of an individual fish. Naval Oceanographic Office. AD849034, 1-17.
  19. Love RH. 1971. Measurements of fish target strength: a review. Fish Bull 69, 703-715.
  20. McClatchie S, Alsop J and Coombs RF. 1996. A re-evaluation of relationships between fish size, acoustic frequency, and target strength. ICES J Mar Sci 53, 780-791. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmsc.1996.0099
  21. McClatchie S, McCauley GJ and Coombs RF. 2003. A requiem for the use of 20 log10 length for acoustic target strength with special reference to deep-sea fishes. ICES J Mar Sci 60, 419-428. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1054-3139(03)00004-3
  22. Simmonds J and MacLennan D. 2005. Fisheries Acoustics, Blackwell Publishing, Oxford, UK, pp. 217-261.
  23. Simrad. 2003. Calibration data sheet of copper sphere, Simrad Norge AS, Norway, pp. 1-2.
  24. Watanuki N and Kawamura G. 1999. A review of cuttlefish basket trap fishery. South Pacific study 19, 31-48.