참고문헌
- Bamberger, Y. M., & Davis, E. A. (2013). Middle-school science students' scientific modelling performances across content areas and within a learning progression. International Journal of Science Education. 35(2), 213-238. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2011.624133
- Chi, M. T., Slotta, J. D., & De Leeuw, N. (1994). From things to processes: A theory of conceptual change for learning science concepts. Learning and Instruction, 4(1), 27-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/0959-4752(94)90017-5
- Choi, K., Lee, H., Shin, N., Kim, S. W., & Krajcik, J. (2011). Re-conceptualization of scientific literacy in South Korea for the 21st century. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(6), 670-697. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20424
- Cobern, W. W., & Aikenhead, G. S. (1998). Cultural aspects of learning science. In B. Fraser & K. Tobin (Eds.), International handbook of science education part 1 (pp. 39-52). Dordrecht, Boston, London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
- College Board (2009). Science college board standards for college sucess. New York, NY: The college board.
- Deboer, G. E. (2000). Scientific literacy: Another look at its historical and contemporary meanings and its relationship to science education reform. Journal of Research Science Teaching, 37(6), 582-601. https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-2736(200008)37:6<582::AID-TEA5>3.0.CO;2-L
- Duit, R. (1991). On the role of analogies and metaphors in learning science. Science Education, 75(6), 649-672. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730750606
- Gentner, D. (1983). Structure-mapping: A theoretical framework for analogy. Cognitive Science, 7(2), 155-170. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog0702_3
- Gilbert, J. (1993). Models & modelling in science education. Hatfield, UK: The Association for Science Education.
- Gilbert, J. K., Pietrocola, M., Zylbersztajn, A., & Faranco, C. (2000). Science and education: Notion of reality, theory and model, In J. K. Gilbert & C. J. Boulter (Eds.), Developing models in science education (pp. 19-40). Netherlands: Springer.
- Glynn, S. M. (1991). Explaining science concepts: A teaching-with-analogies model. In S. M. Glynn, R. H. Yeany, & B. K Britton (Eds.), The psychology of learning science. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
- Harrison, A. G., & Treagust, D. F. (1996). Secondary students' mental models of molecules: Implication for teaching chemistry. Studies in Science Education, 80, 509-534.
- Harrison, A. G., & Treagust, D. F. (2000). Learning about atoms, molecules, and chemical bonds: A case study of multiple-model use in grade 11 chemistry. Science Education, 84, 352-381. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(200005)84:3<352::AID-SCE3>3.0.CO;2-J
- Harrison, A. G., & Treagust, D. F. (2002). The particulate nature of matter: Challenges in understanding the submicroscopoic world. In J. K. Gilbert, O. D. Jong, R. Justi, D. F. Treagust, & J. H. Van Driel, (Eds.), Chemical education: Towards research-based practice (pp. 189-212). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
- Hodgson, T. (1995). Secondary mathematics modeling: Issues and challenges. School Science and Mathematics, 95, 351-358. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.1995.tb15799.x
- Justi, R. S., & Gilbert, J. K. (2002). Modelling, teachers' views on the nature of modelling, and implications for the education of modellers. International Journal of Science Education, 24(4), 369-387. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690110110142
- Kenyon, L., Schwarz, C., & Hug, B. (2008). The benefits of scientific modelling. Science and Children, 46(2), 40-44.
- Kozma, R., Chin, E., Russell, J., & Marx, N. (2000). The roles of representations and tools in the chemistry laboratory and their implications for chemistry learning. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 9(2), 105-143. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls0902_1
- Maeng, S. H., Seong, Y. S., & Jang, S. H. (2013). Present states methodological features and an exemplar study of the research on learning progressions. Journal of Korean Association for Science Education, 33(1), 161-180. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2013.33.1.161
- Ministry of Education. (2011). The science curriculum of the republic of Korea 2009 revised version. Proclamation of the ministry of education, science and technology #2011-361.
- Mohan, L., Chen, J., & Anderson, C. W. (2009). Developing a multi-year learning progression for carbon cycling in socio-ecological systems. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(6), 675-698. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20314
- National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: The National Academy Press.
- National Research Council. (2005). How students learn: Science in the classroom. In M. S. Donovan & J. D. Bransford (Eds.), Committee on how people learn, a targeted report for teachers. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
- National Research Council. (2007). Taking science to school: Learning and teaching science in grades K-8. In R. A. Duschl, H. A. Schweingruber, & A. W. Shouse (Eds.). Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
- National Research Council. (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Committee on conceptual framework for the new K-12 science education standards. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
- National Research Council. (2013). Education for life and work: Developing transferable knowledge and skills in the 21st century. In Pellegrino, J. W., & Hilton, M. L. (Eds.). Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
- NGSS Lead States. (2013). Next generation science standards: For states, by states. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
- Noh, T,, Yoon, M., Kang, H., & Han, J. (2007). Semiotic analysis of the inscriptions representing concept of atom and molecule in the 9th grade science textbooks. Journal of the Korean Chemical Society, 51(5), 423-432. https://doi.org/10.5012/jkcs.2007.51.5.423
- Noh, T,, Yoon, M., & Han, J. (2009). Students' comprehension and interpretation process of inscriptions representing the concept of atom and molecule. Journal of the Korean Chemical Society, 53(3), 355-367. https://doi.org/10.5012/jkcs.2009.53.3.355
- Roth, W. M., & McGinn, M. K. (1998). Inscriptions: Toward a theory of representing as social practice. Review of Educational Research, 68(1), 35-59. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543068001035
- Scalise, K., & Gifford, B. (2006). Computer-based assessment in e-learning: A framework for constructing "intermediate constraint" questions and tasks for technology platforms. The Journal of Technology, Learning, and Assessment, 4(6), 1-45.
- Schmidt, W. H., Wang, H. C., & McKnight, C. C. (2005). Curriculum coherence: An examination of US mathematics and science content standards from an international perspective. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 37(5), 525-559. https://doi.org/10.1080/0022027042000294682
- Smith, C. L., Wiser, M., Anderson, C. W., & Krajcik, J. S. (2006). Implications of research on children's learning for standards and assessment: A proposed learning progression for matter and the atomic molecular theory. Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives, 14(1-2), 1-98.
- Stevens, S. Y., Delgado, C., & Krajcik, J. S. (2010). Developing a theoretical learning progression for atomic structure and inter-atomic interactions. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 47(6), 687-715.
- Stevens, S. Y., & Shin, N. (2010). An investigation into students' interpretations of submicroscopic representations. Poster presented at the International Conferences of the Learning Sciences, Chicago, IL, USA.
- Stevens, S. Y., Shin, N., & Krajcik, J. S. (2009a). Towards a model for the development of an empirically tested learning progression. Paper presented at the Learning Progressions in Science (LeaPS) Conference, Iowa City, IA, USA.
- Stevens, S.Y., Shin, N., & Peek-Brown, D. (2013). Learning progressions as a guide for developing meaningful science learning: A new framework for old ideas. Journal of Education Quimica, 24(4), 381-390.
- Stevens, S., Sutherland, L., & Krajcik, J. S. (2009b). The big ideas of nanoscale science and engineering. Arlington, VA: National Science Teachers Association Press.
- Schwarz, C., Reiser, B., Davis, E., Kenyon, L., Acher, A., Fortus, D., Shwartz, Y., Hug, B., & Krajcik, J. (2009a). Developing a learning progression for scientific modeling: Making scientific modeling accessible and meaningful for learners. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(6), 632-654. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20311
- Schwarz, C., Reiser, B., Fortus, D., Shwartz, Y., Acher, A., Davis, B., Krajcik, J., & Hug, B. (2009b). Models: Defining a learning progression for scientific modeling. Paper presented at the Learning Progression in Science (LeaPS) conference, Iowa City, IA, USA.
- Treagust, D. F., Chittleborough, G. D., & Mamiala, T. L. (2003). The role of submicroscopic and symbolic representations in chemical explanations. International Journal of Science Education, 25(11), 1353-1369. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069032000070306
- Tuckey, H., & Selvaratnam, M. (1993). Studies involving three-dimensional visualisation skills in chemistry: A review. Studies in Science Education, 21(1), 99-121. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057269308560015
- Wu, H. K., & Puntambekar, S. (2012). Pedagogical affordances of multiple external representations in scientific processes. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 21(6), 754-767. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-011-9363-7
피인용 문헌
- Exploring Levels of High School Students’ Conceptual Understanding andModeling Performance Regarding Cell Division vol.43, pp.3, 2014, https://doi.org/10.15717/bioedu.2015.43.3.261
- 과학과 교육과정의 연계성 국제 비교: 광합성 개념 중심으로 vol.35, pp.5, 2014, https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2015.35.5.0805
- 생태계에 대한 학습발달과정의 개발과 평가 vol.36, pp.1, 2016, https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2016.36.1.0029
- 초등학생의 지구의 운동과 태양계 학습 발달과정의 타당성 검증: 구인 타당도 및 결과 타당도를 중심으로 vol.36, pp.1, 2014, https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2016.36.1.0177
- 용해와 용액 개념에 대한 학습발달과정 조사 vol.36, pp.2, 2014, https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2016.36.2.0295
- 기초공통개념으로서 에너지에 대한 3~9학년 학생들의 문항 반응 분석 vol.36, pp.6, 2016, https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2016.36.6.0815
- 분산 인지의 관점에 따른 모델링 중심 초등 과학 수업의 해석 vol.36, pp.1, 2014, https://doi.org/10.15267/keses.2017.36.1.016
- 물질의 특성에 대한 중학생의 거시적 개념과 미시적 개념의 비교 vol.62, pp.3, 2018, https://doi.org/10.5012/jkcs.2018.62.3.243
- 반응적 교수법에 의한 고등학교 1학년 학생들의 질량 보존과 부피 변화에 대한 사고 변화 분석 vol.64, pp.5, 2014, https://doi.org/10.5012/jkcs.2020.64.5.304