Nuclear Engineering and Technology

  • 제46권5호
  • /
  • Pages.667-674
  • /
  • 2014
  • /
  • 1738-5733(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2234-358X(eISSN)
한국원자력학회 (Korean Nuclear Society)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

KTM TOKAMAK OPERATION SCENARIOS SOFTWARE INFRASTRUCTURE

  • Pavlov, V. (National Research Tomsk Polytechnic University (TPU)) ;
  • Baystrukov, K. (National Research Tomsk Polytechnic University (TPU)) ;
  • Golobokov, Yu. (National Research Tomsk Polytechnic University (TPU)) ;
  • Ovchinnikov, A. (National Research Tomsk Polytechnic University (TPU)) ;
  • Mezentsev, A. (National Research Tomsk Polytechnic University (TPU)) ;
  • Merkulov, S. (National Research Tomsk Polytechnic University (TPU)) ;
  • Lee, A. (National Research Tomsk Polytechnic University (TPU)) ;
  • Tazhibayeva, I. (National Nuclear Center (NNC)) ;
  • Shapovalov, G. (National Nuclear Center (NNC))
  • 투고 : 2014.02.10
  • 심사 : 2014.05.25
  • 발행 : 2014.10.25
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

One of the largest problems for tokamak devices such as Kazakhstan Tokamak for Material Testing (KTM) is the operation scenarios' development and execution. Operation scenarios may be varied often, so a convenient hardware and software solution is required for scenario management and execution. Dozens of diagnostic and control subsystems with numerous configuration settings may be used in an experiment, so it is required to automate the subsystem configuration process to coordinate changes of the related settings and to prevent errors. Most of the diagnostic and control subsystems software at KTM was unified using an extra software layer, describing the hardware abstraction interface. The experiment sequence was described using a command language. The whole infrastructure was brought together by a universal communication protocol supporting various media, including Ethernet and serial links. The operation sequence execution infrastructure was used at KTM to carry out plasma experiments.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Azizov E.A. et al. "Kazakhstan tokamak for material testing." Plasma Dev. Oper., vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 39-55 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1080/1051999031000088457
  2. Baystrukov K.I., Pavlov V.M., Sharnin A.V., Obhodskij A.V., Merkulov S.V., Golobokov Y.N., Mezentsev A.A., Ovchinnikov A.V., Tazhibaeva I.L., "Control and data acquisition system of tokamak KTM". Proc. of the 17th IAEA Technical Meeting on Research Using Small Fusion Devices 22-24 October 2007 Lisbon, Portugal: American Institute of Physics, Melville, New York, 2008, vol 996, pp. 297-306.
  3. Ovchinnikov A.V., Pavlov V.M., Erusaev A.P., Sharnin A.V. and Golobokov Y.N.. "Software architecture of tokamak KTM data acquisition subsystems", 19th IAEA Technical Meeting on Research Using Small Fusion Devices 28-30 September 2009 Kurchatov, Kazakhstan.
  4. Sharnin A.V., Baystrukov K.I., Rogozniy D.V.. "Design of data acquisition and control subsystem of the КТМ tokamak multifrequency pulse radar reflectometer". Plasma Dev. Oper., vol. 11., no. 4., pp. 237-241 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1080/1051999031000155579
  5. Obkhodskii A. V., Baistrukov K. I., Pavlov V. M., Merkulov S. V. and Golobokov Yu. N.. "A system for measuring the electromagnetic characteristics of the KTM tokamak". Instruments and Experimental Techniques, vol. 51, no. 6, pp. 799 - 804 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0020441208060055
  6. Obkhodskii A.V., Dmitrienko A.A., Merkulov S.V. and Golobokov Y.N.. "Software structure of the KTM tokamak magnetic diagnostics data acquisition system". 19th IAEA Technical Meeting on Research Using Small Fusion Devices 28-30 September 2009 Kurchatov, Kazakhstan.
  7. Ovchinnikov A.V., Erusaev A.P., Pavlov V.M., Golobokov Y.N., Mezentsev A.A., Tazhibaeva I.L. and Shapovalov G.V.. "Software structure of KTM tokamak data acquisition subsystems". [in Russian], Devices and Systems: Control, Monitoring and Diagnostics, no. 1, pp. 33-36 (2010).
  8. V.M. Pavlov, Y. N. Golobokov, A.V. Lysionok. "The Software for Runtime Control of the Experimental Physical Device". Problems of Atomic Science and Technology, Ser. Thermonuclear Fusion, 2011, issue 3, pp. 81-87.