DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

IMPLEMENTATION OF DATA ASSIMILATION METHODOLOGY FOR PHYSICAL MODEL UNCERTAINTY EVALUATION USING POST-CHF EXPERIMENTAL DATA

  • Received : 2013.09.24
  • Accepted : 2014.04.24
  • Published : 2014.10.25

Abstract

The Best Estimate Plus Uncertainty (BEPU) method has been widely used to evaluate the uncertainty of a best-estimate thermal hydraulic system code against a figure of merit. This uncertainty is typically evaluated based on the physical model's uncertainties determined by expert judgment. This paper introduces the application of data assimilation methodology to determine the uncertainty bands of the physical models, e.g., the mean value and standard deviation of the parameters, based upon the statistical approach rather than expert judgment. Data assimilation suggests a mathematical methodology for the best estimate bias and the uncertainties of the physical models which optimize the system response following the calibration of model parameters and responses. The mathematical approaches include deterministic and probabilistic methods of data assimilation to solve both linear and nonlinear problems with the a posteriori distribution of parameters derived based on Bayes' theorem. The inverse problem was solved analytically to obtain the mean value and standard deviation of the parameters assuming Gaussian distributions for the parameters and responses, and a sampling method was utilized to illustrate the non-Gaussian a posteriori distributions of parameters. SPACE is used to demonstrate the data assimilation method by determining the bias and the uncertainty bands of the physical models employing Bennett's heated tube test data and Becker's post critical heat flux experimental data. Based on the results of the data assimilation process, the major sources of the modeling uncertainties were identified for further model development.

Keywords

References

  1. B. E. Boyack, I. Catton, R.B. Duffey, P. Griffith, K. R. Katsma, G. S. Lellouche, S. Levy, U. S. Rohatgi, G. E. Wilson and N. Zuber, "Quantifying Reactor Safety Margins, Parts 1-6," Nuclear Engineering and Design, 119, 1, 1990. https://doi.org/10.1016/0029-5493(90)90071-5
  2. Agnes de Crecy and Pascal Bazin "Quantification of the Uncertainties of the Physical Models of CATHARE 2," BE 2004, Washington DC, 2004.
  3. A. W. Bennett, G. F. Hewitt, H. A. Kearsey and R. K. F. Keeys, "Heat Transfer to Steam -Water Mixtures Flowing in Uniformly Heated Tubes in which the Critical Heat Flux has been Exceeded," AERE-R5373, 1976.
  4. D. C. Groeneveld, J. Q. Shan, A. Z. Vasic, L. K. H. Leung, A. Durmayaz, J. Yang, S.C. Cheng and A. Tanase, "The 2006 CHF look-up table," Nuclear Engineering and Design, 237, 1909-1922, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2007.02.014
  5. D. C. Groeneveld, L. K. H. Leung, Y. Guo, A. Vasic, M. El Nakla, S. W. Peng, J. Yang and S. C. Cheng, "Lookup Tables for Predicting CHF and Film Boiling Heat Transfer: Past, Present, and Future," Nuclear Technology, 152, 87-104, 2005.
  6. K. M. Becker, C. H. Ling, S. Hedberg and G. Strand, "An Experimental Investigation of Post Dryout Heat Transfer," Department of Nuclear Reactor Engineering, Royal Institute of Technology, KTH-NEL-33, 1983.
  7. "SPACE Code Manual," Thermal Hydraulic Safety Research Division, Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute, 2010.
  8. Thomas Bayes, "An Essay Towards Solving a Problem in the Doctrine of Chance," Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, 53, 370-418, 1763. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstl.1763.0053
  9. Matthew A. Jessee, "Cross-Section Adjustment Techniques for BWR Adaptive Simulation," Ph.D. Dissertation, North Carolina State University, 2008.
  10. A. Tarantola, Inverse Problem Theory and Methods for Model Parameter Estimation, Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Philadelphia, 2005.
  11. H. W. Engl and W. Grever, "Using the L-Curve for Determining Optimal Regularization Parameters," Numerische Mathematik, 69, 25, 1994. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002110050078
  12. J. W. Hines, B. R. Upadhyaya, J. M. Doster, R. M. Edwards, K. D. Lewis and P. J. Turinsky, "Advanced Instrumentation and Control Methods for Small and Medium Reactors with IRIS Demonstration," DE-FG07-07ID14895/UTNE/2009-1, 2009.
  13. Jaeseok Heo, "Optimization of Design for SMR via Data Assimilation and Uncertainty Quantification," Ph.D. Dissertation, North Carolina State University, 2011.
  14. Nicholas Metropolis, Arianna W. Rosenbluth, Marshall N. Rosenbluth, Augusta H. Teller and Edward Teller, "Equation of State Calculation by Fast Computing Machines," Journal of Chemical Physics, vol. 21, No.2, pp. 1087-1092, 1953. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1699114
  15. D. Higdon, M. Kennedy, J. C. Cavendish, J. A. Cafeo and R. D. Ryne, "Combining Field Data and Computer Simulation for Calibration and Prediction," SIAM J. Sci. Comput. Vol. 26, No. 2, pp. 448-466, 2004. https://doi.org/10.1137/S1064827503426693