Journal of the Korean Institute of Gas (한국가스학회지)

The Korean Institute of GAS (한국가스학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on Facility Criteria of Small Petrol Stations based on Quantitative Risk Assessment

정량적 위험성 평가에 기반한 간이 주유취급소 시설기준에 대한 연구

  • Park, Wooin (Dept. of Fire Safety and Management, Mokwon University) ;
  • Ku, Jae-Hyun (Dept. of Fire Safety and Management, Mokwon University) ;
  • Song, Yong-Sun (Dept. of Fire Safety and Management, Mokwon University)
  • 박우인 (목원대학교 소방안전관리학과) ;
  • 구재현 (목원대학교 소방안전관리학과) ;
  • 송용선 (목원대학교 소방안전관리학과)
  • Received : 2014.05.11
  • Accepted : 2014.06.23
  • Published : 2014.06.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Small petrol stations have great potential for a wide distribution in metropolitan area in which the land value possesses primary installation cost of the facility. The objective of the present study is to propose appropriate facility regulations of small petrol stations in Korea that can be popularly installed in the future in terms of securing safety in addition to serviceability. The hazard analysis and damage prediction from the possible fire and explosion accidents were performed using a software, PHAST v.6.5. As essential components of the facility regulations proposed in this study, the regulations about the refueling lot, maximum capacity of underground tank, location of fixed refueling facilities, height of firewall for small petrol stations were subsequently compared with those for regular-sized petrol stations.

높은 지가로 인해 초기 설치투자비가 많이 필요한 수도권의 경우 간이 주유취급소는 광범위하게 보급할 수 있는 큰 잠재력을 가지고 있다. 본 연구에서는 향후 국내에 설치 보급될 수 있는 간이 주유취급소에 대하여 편의성 및 안전성을 갖는 합리적인 시설기준을 제시하고자 하였다. 이를 위해 현실적으로 간이 주유취급소에서 발생할 수 있는 상황을 고려한 누출 시나리오를 선정하고, 피해예측 프로그램인 PHAST v.6.5를 이용하여 화재 및 폭발 사고의 피해범위를 산출하고, 그 피해영향을 해석하였다. 위험성 평가결과를 바탕으로, 간이 주유취급소의 주유공지, 전용탱크 상한용량, 고정주유설비 설치위치 및 방화벽 높이에 대한 기준을 현행 위험물안전관리법상의 일반 주유취급소와 비교하여 제안하였다.

Keywords

References

  1. Ordinance of the Ministry of Public Administration and Security, Enforcement Regulations of Safety Control of Dangerous Substances Act, http://www.law.go.kr/lsInfoP.do?lsiSeq=138038&efYd=20130323#0000, Korea, (2013)
  2. Understanding Fire Protection III, (hazardous facilities), Fire Press, Korea, (2012)
  3. Lee, C. W., Cha, S. C., Hwang, J. H., and Park, G. Y., Fire Engineering and Fire Protection Applications, 1, SIDAEGOSI, Korea, (2010)
  4. Accident statistics by type of dangerous substance (2011-2012), Korea Dangerous Material Inventory Management System, www.nema.kr/hazmat
  5. European Industrial Gases Association Aisbl, "Determination of Safety Distances", IGC Doc, 75/07/E, Belgium, (2007)
  6. Lee, K. J., Quantitative Simulation-based Safety Analysis of Energy-filling Facilities for Improved Sustainability, M.S. Thesis, Myongji University, (2005)
  7. Bjerketvedt, D., Bakke, J. R., and Wingerden, K. V., "Gas Explosion Handbook", Journal of Hazardous Materials, 52, 1-150, (1997) https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3894(97)81620-2
  8. Guidelines for Chemical Process Quantitative Risk Analysis, Center for Chemical Process Safety of the American Institute of Chemical Engineering, 2nd Ed., New york, (2000)
  9. World Bank, Techniques for Assessing Industrial Hazards, World Bank Technical Paper, 55, Washington, D.C., (1998)
  10. Dan, S., Lee, C. J., Shin, D., and Yoon, E. S., "Quantitative Risk Analysis of Fire and Explosion on the Top-Side LNG-Liquefaction Process of LNG-FPSO", Journal of Process Safety Environmental Protection, Accepted 23 April, (2014)