Journal of the Korean Institute of Gas (한국가스학회지)

The Korean Institute of GAS (한국가스학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Analysis on Dynamic Ductile Fracture of Transportation Pipeline for Carbon Dioxide Capture and Storage System

CO2 배관의 연속연성파괴 분석

  • 정효태 (강릉원주대학교 신소재금속공학과) ;
  • 최병학 (강릉원주대학교 신소재금속공학과) ;
  • 김우식 (한국가스공사 연구개발원) ;
  • 백종현 (한국가스공사 연구개발원)
  • Received : 2014.04.21
  • Accepted : 2014.06.05
  • Published : 2014.06.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Dynamic ductile fracture (DDF) has been studied in the transportation pipeline for the carbon dioxide capture and storage(CCS) system. DDF behavior of CCS transportation pipeline has been analyzed using Battelle Two Curve Method (BTCM) and compared with the DDF behavior of natural gas pipeline. The operating safety criteria against the DDF has been investigated based on the sensitivity analyses of the pipe thickness and the operating temperature for the $CO_2$ pipeline. The DDF criteria can be applied to confirm the operating safety of the $CO_2$ pipeline. If the commercial natural gas pipeline were used at room temperature as a $CO_2$ pipeline, the thickness of pipe should be at least 7mm and the pressure should be less than 54bar for the $CO_2$ pipeline system.

이산화탄소 포집 및 저장 시스템(CCS, Carbon dioxide Capture and Storage system)의 수송배관에 대한 연속연성파괴(DDF, Dynamic Ductile Fracture)를 연구하기 위하여 Battlle Two Curve법(BTCM)으로 CCS수송배관의 연속연성파괴거동을 해석하여 천연가스 수송배관의 연속연성파괴거동과 비교하였다. 또한, $CO_2$배관에서의 배관두께 및 사용온도에 따른 연속연성파괴 민감도를 분석함으로써 연속연성파괴에 대한 사용기준을 해석하였다. 우리나라 기후조건에 따른 $CO_2$배관두께와 수송압력 사용기준을 분석하였으며, 상온의 경우에는 기존의 천연가스용 배관을 $CO_2$배관으로 사용하기 위해서는 배관두께가 7mm이상이어야 하고 수송압력은 54bar이하이어야 함을 해석하였다.

Keywords

References

  1. T.Harmelen, A.Horssen, M. Jozwicka, "air pollution impacts from carbon capture and storage (ccs)", EEA Technical report, 14 (2011)
  2. S.T. McCoy, E.S. Rubin, "An engineering-economic model of pipeline transport of $CO_2$ with application to carbon capture and storage", Greenhouse Gas Control, 2, 2 (2008)
  3. W.A. Maxey, "Fracture Initiaion, Propagation and Arrest", Paper J Proceedings of Houston, Texas, AGA(1974)
  4. W.A. maxey, F.F. Kiefner, and R.J. Eiber, "Ductile Fracture Arrest in Gas Pipelines", NG-18 Report 100, Texas, AGA(1976)
  5. G. Wilkowski, D. Rudland, H Xu, and N. Sandercon, "Effect of Grade on Ductile Fracnture Arrest Criteria for Gas Pipelines", Proc. Of International Pipeline Conference (2006)
  6. G.D. Fearnehough and D.G. Jones, "Toughness specification for shear fracture arrest in pipelines", International conference on analytical and experimental fracture mechanics (1980)
  7. G.H. Vogt et al, "EPRG Report on toughness for crack arrest in gas pipelins", 3R International, 22, 98 (1983)
  8. F. Bonomo, "A survey and tentative revision of the ductile fracture arrest criterion in pipelines for gas transmission", International conference on analytical and experimental fracture mechanics, Rome (1980)
  9. P.E. O'donoghue, M.F. Kanninen, C.P. Leung, G. Demofonti, S. Venzi, "The development and validation of a dynamic fracture propagation model for gas transmission pipelines", Int. J. Pres. Ves. & Piping, 70, 11 (1997) https://doi.org/10.1016/S0308-0161(96)00012-9