DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Collaboration Management Strategies and Product Development Performance

여러 공급업체와 공동개발에서의 협업전략과 제품개발 성과

  • 홍윤숙 (울산대학교 경영대학 경영학부)
  • Received : 2014.07.18
  • Accepted : 2014.08.29
  • Published : 2014.09.30

Abstract

In collaborative product development with multiple suppliers, buyers must manage the suppliers' activities. This empirical research investigates the performance impacts of three strategies that buyers use to manage suppliers who design interdependent components. These strategies are: Instructionism (giving clear instructions to suppliers), Teaming (forming an interactive development team with suppliers), and Delegation (transferring component development responsibilities to suppliers). Data were collected through a cross-industry web-based survey of buying firms in manufacturing industries whose products require multiple, interdependent components. A path analysis utilizing 318 survey responses indicates that Instructionism has a positive effect on design quality, and Teaming has a positive effect on design quality and component innovation. The use of Delegation is not related to any of the performance indicators. The practical implication of this research for product development managers is that both Instructionism and Teaming can be effective strategies. For the purpose of assuring design quality, a buyer should give clear instructions in detailed specifications or work closely with suppliers in development teams. If competitive priority is product innovativeness, however, the buyer should work closely with its suppliers during component development processes using a Teaming strategy.

Keywords

References

  1. Adler, P.S., "Interdepartmental interdependence and coordination : the case of the design/ manufacturing interface," Organization Science, Vol.6(1995), pp.147-167. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.6.2.147
  2. Ahmadi, R., T.A. Roemer, and R.H. Wang, "Structuring product development processes," European Journal of Operational Research, Vol.130(2001), pp.539-558. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(99)00412-9
  3. Allen, T.J., "Communications, technology transfer, and the role of technical gatekeeper," R&D Management, Vol.1(1971), pp.14-21.
  4. Ancona, D.G. and D.F. Caldwell, "Beyond boundary spanning : managing external dependence in product development teams," Journal of High Technology Management Research, Vol.1(1990), pp.119-135. https://doi.org/10.1016/1047-8310(90)90001-K
  5. Argote, L., "Input uncertainty and organizational coordination in hospital emergency units," Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol.27(1982), pp.420-434.. https://doi.org/10.2307/2392320
  6. Armstrong, J. and T. Overton, "Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys," Journal of Marketing Research, Vol.14(1977), pp.396-402. https://doi.org/10.2307/3150783
  7. Brown, S.L. and K.M. Eisenhardt, "Product development : past research, present findings, and future directions," Academy of Management Review, Vol.20(1995), pp.343-378.
  8. Carbone, J., "Outsourcing moves up the electronics food chain," Purchasing, 2002, pp. 36-44, October 24.
  9. Chen, J., R.R. Reilly, and G.S. Lynn, "The impacts of speed-to-market on new product success : the moderating effects on uncertainty," IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, Vol.52(2005), pp.199-212. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2005.844926
  10. Cho, G. and S.-G. So, "A quantitative model for supplier-buyer's profit sharing and pricing policies based on supply chain partnerships," Journal of the Korean Operations Research and Management Science Society, Vol.31(2006), pp.73-81.
  11. Choe, J.-M., "The relationships among Ecommerce, BSC, inter-organizational information flow and supply-chain performance," Korean Management Science Review, Vol. 30(2013), pp.149-165. https://doi.org/10.7737/KMSR.2013.30.1.149
  12. Choi, T. and Y. Hong, "Unveiling the structure of supply networks : case studies in Honda, Acura, and Daimler Chrysler," Journal of Operations Management, Vol.20(2002), pp.469-493. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-6963(02)00025-6
  13. Clark, K., "Project scope and project performance : the effects of parts strategy and supplier involvement on product development," Management Science, Vol.35(1989), pp.1247-1263. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.35.10.1247
  14. Clark, K.B. and T. Fujimoto, Product Development Performance, Harvard Business School Press, 1991.
  15. Curran, P.J., S.G. West, and J. Finch, "The robustness of test statistics to non-normality and specification error in confirmatory factor analysis," Psychological Methods, Vol.1(1996), pp.16-29. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.1.1.16
  16. Daft, R.L. and R. Lengel, "Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design," Management Science, Vol. 32(1986), pp.554-571. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.32.5.554
  17. Dillman, D.A., Mail and Internet Surveys : The Tailored Design Method, 2nd ed. New York, NY : John Wiley and Sons, 2000.
  18. Fine, C.H., Clockspeed : Winning Industry Control in the Age of Temporary Advantage : Perseus Books, 1998.
  19. Fiol, C.M. and M.A. Lyles, "Organizational learning," Academy of Management Review, Vol.10(1985), pp.803-813.
  20. Fujimoto, T., The Evolution of a Manufacturing System at Toyota, New York : Oxford University Press, 1999.
  21. Galbraith, J.R., Organization Design. Reading, Massachusetts : Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, 1977.
  22. Garvin, D.A., "What does "product quality" really mean?," Sloan Management Review, Vol.26(1984), pp.25-43.
  23. Gittell, J.H., "Coordinating mechanisms in care provider groups : relational coordination as a mediator and input uncertainty as a moderator of performance effects," Management Science, Vol.48(2002), pp.1408-1426. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.48.11.1408.268
  24. Grant, D., "Toyota recall : as firms go global, so do their glitches," in The Christian Science Monitor, ed, 2010.
  25. Hair, J.F., R.E. Anderson, R.L. Tatham, and W.C. Black, Multivariate Data Analysis, 5th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ : Prentice-Hall,1998.
  26. Hartley, J.L., J.R. Meredith, D. McCutcheon, and R.R. Kamath, "Suppliers' contributions to product development : an exploratory study," IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, Vol.44(1997), pp.258-267. https://doi.org/10.1109/17.618077
  27. Hartley, J.L., B.J. Zirger, and R.R. Kamath, "Managing the buyer-supplier interface for on-time performance in product development," Journal of Operations Management, Vol.15(1997), pp.57-70. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-6963(96)00089-7
  28. Hoegl, M., K. Weinkauf, and H.G. Gemuenden, "Interteam coordination, project commitment, and teamwork in multiteam R&D projects : a longitudinal study," Organization Science, Vol.15(2004), p.38. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1030.0053
  29. Hong, Y. and J.L. Hartley, "Managing the supplier-supplier interface in product development : the moderating role of technological newness," Journal of Supply Chain Management, Vol.47(2011), pp.43-62. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-493X.2011.03234.x
  30. Hong, Y., J.N. Pearson, and A.S. Carr, "A typology of coordination strategy in multiorganizational product development," International Journal of Operations and Production Management, Vol.29(2009), pp.1000-1024. https://doi.org/10.1108/01443570910993465
  31. Huber, G.P., "Organizational learning : the contributing processes and the literatures," Organization Science, Vol.2(1991), pp.88-115. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2.1.88
  32. Kamath, R.R. and J.K. Liker, "A second look at Japanese product development," Harvard Business Review, Vol.72(1994), pp.154-170.
  33. Kannan, V.R. and K.C. Tan, "Supplier selection and assessment : their impact on business performance," Journal of Supply Chain Management, Vol.38(2002), p.11. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-493X.2002.tb00139.x
  34. Keller, R.T., "Technology-information processing fit and the performance of R&D project groups : a test of contingency theory," Academy of Management Journal, Vol.37 (1994), pp.167-179. https://doi.org/10.2307/256775
  35. Koufteros, X., T.C.E. Cheng, and K.-H. Lai, ""Black-box" and "gray-box" supplier integration in product development : antecedents, consequences and the moderating role of firm size," Journal of Operations Management, Vol.25(2007), pp.847-870. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2006.10.009
  36. Koufteros, X., M.A. Vonderembse, and W. Doll, "Concurrent engineering and its consequences," Journal of Operations Mangement, Vol.19(2001), pp.97-115. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-6963(00)00048-6
  37. Larson, E. and D. Gobeli, "Significance of project management structure on development success," IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, Vol.36(1989), pp.119-125. https://doi.org/10.1109/17.18828
  38. Laseter, T.M. and K. Ramdas, "Product types and supplier roles in product development : an exploratory analysis," IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, Vol.49 (2002), pp.107-118. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2002.1010879
  39. Lee, S.-Y., "A study on the effects of collaborative supply management on buyer and supplier performance : from a view of capabilities transfer throughout the supply chain," Journal of the Korean Operations Research and Management Science Society, Vol.34 (2009), pp.85-103.
  40. Liker, J.K. and T.Y. Choi, "Building deep supplier relationships," Harvard Business Review, Vol.82(2004), p.104.
  41. Liker, J.K., D.K. Sobek II, A.C. Ward, and J.J. Cristiano, "Involving suppliers in product development in the United States and Japan : evidence for set-based concurrent engineering," IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, Vol.43(1996), pp. 165-178. https://doi.org/10.1109/17.509982
  42. Lunsford, J.L., "Boeing moves to solve 787 delays," in The Wall Street Journal, ed, 2008, p.A3.
  43. Lunsford, J.L., "Boeing, in embarrassing setback, says 787 Dreamliner will be delayed," in Wall Street Journal, ed, 2007.
  44. Mabert, V., J. Muth, and R. Schmenner, "Collapsing new product development times : six case studies," Journal of Product Innovation Management, Vol.9(1992), pp.200-212. https://doi.org/10.1016/0737-6782(92)90030-G
  45. McCarthy, I.P., C. Tsinopoulos, P. Allen, and C. Rose-Anderssen, "New product development as a complex adaptive system of decisions," Journal of Product Innovation Management, Vol.23(2006), pp.437-456. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5885.2006.00215.x
  46. Mikkola, J.H., "Modularity, component outsourcing, and inter-firm learning," R&D Management, Vol.33(2003), pp.439-454. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9310.00309
  47. Mintzberg, H., The Structuring of Organizations. Englewood Cliffs, N.J. : Prentice- Hall, Inc., 1979.
  48. Monczka, R.M., R.B. Handfield, T.V. Scannell, G.L. Ragatz, and D.J. Frayer, New Product Development : Strategies for Supplier Integration, Milwaukee, Wisconsin : ASQ Quality Press, 2000.
  49. Nellore, R. and K. Soderquist, "Portfolio approaches to procurement : analyzing the missing link to specifications," Long Range Planning, Vol.33(2000), pp.245-267. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0024-6301(00)00027-3
  50. Nunnally, J.C., Psychometric Theory, 2nd ed. New York : McGraw-Hill, 1978.
  51. O'Leary-Kelly, S.W. and R.J. Vokurka, "The empirical assessment of construct validity," Journal of Operations Management, Vol.16 (1989), pp.387-408.
  52. O'Neal, C., "Concurrent engineering with early supplier involvement : a cross-functional challenge," International Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management, Vol.29 (1993), pp.3-9.
  53. Parker, D.B., G.A. Zsidisin, and G.L. Ragatz, "Timing and extent of supplier integration in new product adoption : an integrative model," Journal of Supply Chain Management, Vol.44(2008), pp.71-83. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-493X.2008.00046.x
  54. Persaud, A., U. Kumar, and V. Kumar, "Coordination structures and innovative performance in global R&D labs," Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, Vol.19(2002), pp.57-75.
  55. Petersen, K., R.B. Handfield, and G.L. Ragatz, "A model of supplier integration into new product development," The Journal of Product Innovation Management, Vol.20(2003), pp.284-299. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-5885.00028
  56. Petersen, K.J., R.B. Handfield, and G.L. Ragatz, "Supplier integration into new product development : coordinating product, process and supply chain design," Journal of Operations Management, Vol.23(2005), pp.371-388. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2004.07.009
  57. Pich, M.T., C.H. Loch, and A. DeMeyer, "On uncertainty, ambiguity, and complexity in project management," Management Science, Vol.48(2002), pp.1008-1023. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.48.8.1008.163
  58. Podsakoff, P.M. and D.W. Organ, "Self-reports in organizational research : problems and prospects," Journal of Management Information Systems, Vol.12(1986), pp.531-544.
  59. Prencipe, A., A. Davies, and M. Hobday, The Business of Systems Integration. New York : Oxford University Press, 2003.
  60. Primo, M. and S. Amundson, "An exploratory study of the effects of supplier relationships on new product development outcomes," Journal of Operations Management, Vol.20(2002), pp.33-52. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-6963(01)00080-8
  61. Ragatz, G.L., R.B. Handfield, and T.V. Scannell, "Success factors for integrating suppliers into new product development," Journal of Product Innovation Management, Vol.14(1997), pp.190-202. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0737-6782(97)00007-6
  62. Raykov, T., "Coefficeient alpha and composite reliability with interrelated nonhomogeneous items," Applied Psychological Measurement, Vol.22(1998), pp.375-385. https://doi.org/10.1177/014662169802200407
  63. Ro, Y.K., J.K. Liker, and S.K. Fixson, "Evolving models of supplier involvement in design : the deterioration of the Japanese model in US auto," IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, Vol.55(2008), pp.359-377. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2008.919733
  64. Ro, Y.K., J.K. Liker, and S.K. Fixson, "Modularity as a strategy for supply chain coordination : the case of U.S. auto," IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, Vol. 54(2007), pp.172-189. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2006.889075
  65. Sanchez, R. and J.T. Mahoney, "Modularity, flexibility, and knowledge management in product and organization design," Strategic Management Journal, Vol.17(1996), pp.63-76. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250171107
  66. Seo, C. and C. Kim, "The effect of trust bet ween buyer-supplier relationship on collaboration and supply chain performance : networks industry in Korea," Korean Management Science Review, Vol.25(2008), pp. 11-27.
  67. Simon, H.A., "Applying information technology to organization design," Public Administration Review, Vol.33(1973), pp.268-278. https://doi.org/10.2307/974804
  68. Song, M. and M. Montoya-Weiss, "Critical development activities for really new versus incremental products," Journal of Product Innovation Management, Vol.15(1998), pp.124-135. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0737-6782(97)00077-5
  69. Song, M. and M. Swink, "Marketing-manufacturing integration across stages of new product development : effects on the success of high- and low-innovativeness products," IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, Vol.56(2009), pp.31-44. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2008.2009790
  70. Stackpole, B., "Boeing's brave new world of product development," Design News, Vol. 62(2007), pp.91-94.
  71. Tatikonda, M.V. and M.M. Montoya-Weiss, "Integrating operations and marketing perspectives of product innovation," Management Science, Vol.47(2001), pp.151-172. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.47.1.151.10669
  72. Terwiesch, C., C.H. Loch, and A. DeMeyer, "Exchanging preliminary information in concurrent engineering : alternative coordination strategies," Organization Science, Vol. 13(2002), pp.402-419. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.13.4.402.2948
  73. Thompson, J.D., Organizations in Action. New York : McGraw-Hill, 1967.
  74. Tushman, M. and R. Katz, "External communication and project performance : an investigation into the role of gatekeepers," Management Science, Vol.26(1980), pp.1071-1085. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.26.11.1071
  75. Van de Ven, A.J., "Central problems in the management of innovation," Management Science, Vol.32(1986), pp.590-607. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.32.5.590
  76. Van de Ven, A.J., "Central problems in the management of innovation," Management Science, Vol.32(1986), pp.590-607. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.32.5.590
  77. Van den Bulte, C. and R.K. Moenaert, "The effects of R&D team co-location on communication patterns among R&D, marketing, and manufacturing," Management Science, Vol.44(1998), pp.1-17. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.44.1.1
  78. Von Hippel, E., " "Sticky information" and the locus of problem solving : Implications for innovation," Management Science, Vol. 40(1994), pp.429-439. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.40.4.429
  79. Wasti, S.N. and J.K. Liker, "Risky business or competitive power? Supplier involement in Japanese product design," The Journal of Product Innovation Management, Vol.14(1997), p.337. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0737-6782(97)00024-6
  80. West, S.G., J.F. Finch, and P.J. Curran, "Structural equation models with nonnormal variables : problems and remedies," in Structural Equation Modeling : Concepts, Issues and Applications, R.H. Hoyle, Ed., ed, (1995), pp.56-75.
  81. Wu, Z., T.Y. Choi, and M.J. Rungtusanatham, "Supplier-supplier relationship in buyersupplier- supplier triads : implications for supplier performance," Journal of Operations Management, Vol.28(2010), pp.115-123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2009.09.002
  82. Yoo, S.H., "Buyer-supplier collaboration and benefit-sharing strategy in a supply chain," Journal of the Korean Operations Research and Management Science Society, Vol.36 (2011), pp.69-84.