Archives of Plastic Surgery

Korean Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons (대한성형외과학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Aesthetic Design of Skin-Sparing Mastectomy Incisions for Immediate Autologous Tissue Breast Reconstruction in Asian Women

  • Tan, Bien-Keem (Department of Plastic Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, Singapore General Hospital) ;
  • Chim, Harvey (Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Miami) ;
  • Ng, Zhi Yang (Department of Plastic Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, Singapore General Hospital) ;
  • Ong, Kong Wee (Department of Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Centre)
  • Received : 2014.05.06
  • Accepted : 2014.07.01
  • Published : 2014.07.15
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Background The advent of skin-sparing mastectomy has allowed for the reconstruction of the breast and nipple with improved cosmesis. However, the nipple-areolar complex (NAC) in Asian patients is more pigmented and scars easily. Therefore, commonly described incisions tend to result in poor aesthetic outcomes in Asian patients with breast cancer. Methods We describe an algorithmic approach to skin-sparing mastectomy incisions in Asian patients on the basis of the location of the biopsy scar and the tumor site and size. Four incision types are described: peri-areolar, a peri-areolar incision with a second distant skin paddle, "racquet handle," and peri-areolar with adjacent skin excision. Results 281 immediate breast reconstructions were performed between May 2001 and February 2012 after skin-sparing mastectomy. The mastectomy incisions used included the peri-areolar design (n=124, 44%), peri-areolar design with a second distant skin paddle (n=39, 14%), "racquet handle" (n=21, 7.5%), and peri-areolar design with adjacent skin excision (n=42, 14%). The traditional elliptical incision and other variants where the NAC outline was not preserved were performed in the remaining 55 patients. The average follow-up was 44.7 months during which there was 1 case of total flap loss and 7 cases of partial flap necrosis; all remaining flaps survived. 24% of the patients (68/281) underwent subsequent nipple reconstruction. Conclusions Our algorithm avoids breast incisions that are randomly placed or excessively long and prevents the unnecessary sacrifice of normal breast skin. This allows skin-sparing mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction to be performed with a consistently achievable aesthetic result in Asian women without neglecting oncological safety.

Keywords

References

  1. Toth BA, Lappert P. Modified skin incisions for mastectomy: the need for plastic surgical input in preoperative planning. Plast Reconstr Surg 1991;87:1048-53. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-199106000-00006
  2. Elliott LF, Eskenazi L, Beegle PH Jr, et al. Immediate TRAM flap breast reconstruction: 128 consecutive cases. Plast Reconstr Surg 1993;92:217-27. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-199308000-00004
  3. Grotting JC, Urist MM, Maddox WA, et al. Conventional TRAM flap versus free microsurgical TRAM flap for immediate breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 1989;83:828-41. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-198905000-00009
  4. Carlson GW. Skin sparing mastectomy: anatomic and technical considerations. Am Surg 1996;62:151-5.
  5. Bensimon RH, Bergmeyer JM. Improved aesthetics in breast reconstruction: modified mastectomy incision and immediate autologous tissue reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg 1995;34:229-33. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000637-199503000-00002
  6. Hidalgo DA. Aesthetic refinement in breast reconstruction: complete skin-sparing mastectomy with autogenous tissue transfer. Plast Reconstr Surg 1998;102:63-70. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-199807000-00009
  7. Chagpar AB. Skin-sparing and nipple-sparing mastectomy: preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative considerations. Am Surg 2004;70:425-32.
  8. Hammond DC, Capraro PA, Ozolins EB, et al. Use of a skin-sparing reduction pattern to create a combination skin-muscle flap pocket in immediate breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2002;110:206-11. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-200207000-00035
  9. Stradling BL, Ahn M, Angelats J, et al. Skin-sparing mastectomy with sentinel lymph node dissection: less is more. Arch Surg 2001;136:1069-75. https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.136.9.1069
  10. Carlson GW. Technical advances in skin sparing mastectomy. Int J Surg Oncol 2011;2011:396901.
  11. Slavin SA, Schnitt SJ, Duda RB, et al. Skin-sparing mastectomy and immediate reconstruction: oncologic risks and aesthetic results in patients with early-stage breast cancer. Plast Reconstr Surg 1998;102:49-62. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-199807000-00008
  12. Losken A, Mackay GJ, Bostwick J 3rd. Nipple reconstruction using the C-V flap technique: a long-term evaluation. Plast Reconstr Surg 2001;108:361-9. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-200108000-00013
  13. Zenn MR, Garofalo JA. Unilateral nipple reconstruction with nipple sharing: time for a second look. Plast Reconstr Surg 2009;123:1648-53. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181a3f2f9
  14. Kroll SS, Ames F, Singletary SE, et al. The oncologic risks of skin preservation at mastectomy when combined with immediate reconstruction of the breast. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1991;172:17-20.
  15. Missana MC, Laurent I, Germain M, et al. Long-term oncological results after 400 skin-sparing mastectomies. J Visc Surg 2013;150:313-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jviscsurg.2013.09.011
  16. Romics L Jr, Chew BK, Weiler-Mithoff E, et al. Ten-year follow-up of skin-sparing mastectomy followed by immediate breast reconstruction. Br J Surg 2012;99:799-806. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.8704
  17. Seifert O, Mrowietz U. Keloid scarring: bench and bedside. Arch Dermatol Res 2009;301:259-72. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00403-009-0952-8
  18. Teo SY, Chuwa E, Latha S, et al. Young breast cancer in a specialised breast unit in singapore: clinical, radiological and pathological factors. Ann Acad Med Singapore 2014;43:79-85.
  19. Komorowska-Timek E, Gurtner GC. Intraoperative perfusion mapping with laser-assisted indocyanine green imaging can predict and prevent complications in immediate breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2010;125:1065-73. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181d17f80
  20. Moyer HR, Losken A. Predicting mastectomy skin flap necrosis with indocyanine green angiography: the gray area defined. Plast Reconstr Surg 2012;129:1043-8. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e31824a2b02
  21. Serletti JM. Breast reconstruction with the TRAM flap: pedicled and free. J Surg Oncol 2006;94:532-7. https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.20492
  22. Benelli LC. Periareolar Benelli mastopexy and reduction: the "round block". In: Spear SL, editor. Surgery of the breast: principles and art. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven; 1998. p.685-96.
  23. Kinoshita S, Kyoda S, Hirano A, et al. Clinical comparison of four types of skin incisions for skin-sparing mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction. Surg Today 2013 Sep 17 [Epub]. http://dx.doi.orgl/10.1007/s00595-013-0722-2.

Cited by

  1. Surgical Management for Early-Stage Bilateral Breast Cancer Patients in China vol.10, pp.4, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0122692
  2. Current Status of Breast Reconstruction in Southern China: A 15 Year, Single Institutional Experience of 20,551 Breast Cancer Patients vol.94, pp.34, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1097/md.0000000000001399
  3. Nipple-Areola Complex Necrosis after Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy with Immediate Autologous Breast Reconstruction vol.42, pp.5, 2014, https://doi.org/10.5999/aps.2015.42.5.601
  4. A Technique of Endoscopic Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy for Breast Cancer vol.21, pp.2, 2014, https://doi.org/10.4293/jsls.2017.00028
  5. Immediate breast reconstruction following nipple-sparing mastectomy in an Asian population: Aesthetic outcomes and mitigating nipple-areolar complex necrosis vol.45, pp.3, 2018, https://doi.org/10.5999/aps.2017.01067
  6. Retrospective observational study of breast reconstruction with extended latissimus dorsi flap following skin-sparing mastectomy vol.97, pp.31, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1097/md.0000000000010936