DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Simulation of (R)- and (S)- Ketoprofen Separation in Simulated Moving Bed (SMB)

(R)-케토프로펜과 (S)- 케토프로펜 분리를 위한 유사 이동층 크로마토그래피의 전산모사

  • Lee, Il Song (Department of Chemical Engineering, Chungnam National Univerisity) ;
  • Lee, In Su (Department of Chemical Engineering, Chungnam National Univerisity) ;
  • Kim, In Ho (Department of Chemical Engineering, Chungnam National Univerisity)
  • 이일송 (충남대학교 공과대학 화학공학과) ;
  • 이인수 (충남대학교 공과대학 화학공학과) ;
  • 김인호 (충남대학교 공과대학 화학공학과)
  • Received : 2014.05.27
  • Accepted : 2014.07.14
  • Published : 2014.08.31

Abstract

A simulation study for finding purity changes of extract and raffinate as well as the best purity of (S)-ketoprofen in simulated moving bed (SMB) was performed with changing parameters of $m_2$ and $m_3$ from triangle theory. Aspen simulator allowed separation process simulation of (R)- and (S)-ketoprofen in SMB and compared 4-bed SMB and 8-bed SMB based on the same Henry constant and mass transfer coefficient. The 4-bed SMB consisted of 4 columns (200 mm of length, 10 mm of diameter) and the 8-bed SMB constructed by 8 columns (100 mm of length, 10 mm of diameter), and therefore total column length was made the same as 800 mm. Considering purities of both (R)-and (S)-ketoprofen, both 4-bed SMB and 8-bed SMB had the best purity when $m_2$ and $m_3$ were on 12.0 and 13.0 in the center of triangle. Taking only (S)-ketoprofen into account, 4-bed SMB as well as 8-bed SMB had the best purity when $m_2$ and $m_3$ were on 10.9 and 12.6 in the left outside triangle, and their purities were 93.3 % for 4-bed SMB and 96.9 % for 8-bed SMB.

Keywords

References

  1. Pirkle, W. H. and T. C. Pochapsky (1987) Advances in Chromatography. J. C. Giddings ed., pp. 91-107. Marcel Dekker, New York, USA.
  2. Heuer, C., P. Hugo, G. Mann, and A. Seidal-Morgenstern (1996) Scale up in preparative chromatography. J. Chromatogr. A. 752: 19-29. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9673(96)00496-7
  3. Nagawa, M. and F. Shoji (1992) Optical resolution by simulated moving bed adsorption technology. J.Chromatogr. A. 877: 113-117.
  4. Ching, C. B., B. G. Lim, E. J. D. Lee, and S. C. Ng (1993) Preparative resolution of praziquanted enantiomers by simulated countercurrent chromatography. J.Chromatogr. A. 634: 215-219. https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9673(93)83007-F
  5. Nicoud, R. M., G. Fuchs, P. Adam, M. Bailly, E. Kusters, F. D. Antia, R. Reuille, and E. Schmid (1993) Preparative scale enatioseparation of a chiral epoxide: comparision of liquid chromatography and simulated moving bed adsorption technology. Chirality 5: 257-271.
  6. Guiochon, G., S. Golshan-Shirazi, and A. Katti (1994) Fundamentals of Preparative and Nonlinear Chromatography. Academic Press, Massachusetts, USA.
  7. Stori, G, M. Mazzotti, M. Morbidelli, and S. Carra (1993) Robust design of binary countercurrent adsorption separation process. AIChE J. 39: 471-492. https://doi.org/10.1002/aic.690390310
  8. Juza, M. (1999) Development of an high-performance liquid chromatographic simulated moving bed separation from and industrial perspective. J. Chromatogr. A. 895: 35-49.
  9. Yoon, T. H., B. H. Chung, and I. H. Kim (2006) A novel design of simulated moving bed (SMB) chromatography for separation of ketoprofen enantiomer. Biotechnol. Bioprocess Eng. 4: 285-291. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02942345