Journal of the Korean earth science society (한국지구과학회지)

The Korean Earth Science Society (한국지구과학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Students' Alternative Conceptions of Plate Boundaries and Their Conception Revision According to Their Reasoning Patterns

  • Received : 2014.07.10
  • Accepted : 2014.09.17
  • Published : 2014.09.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study investigated students' alternative conceptions of plate boundaries and their conception revision according to the pattern of students' reasoning. Participants were twenty-two 10th grade high school students. All participants were asked to draw the three types of plate boundaries and to explain their drawings. Nine students participated in the reasoning activity. To this end, a semi-structured interview was conducted during which key questions were asked for the students to individually answer. The key questions used in the reasoning activity were created, by utilizing questions used in the previous studies. The findings revealed that the alternative conceptions of plate boundaries were classified into three levels based on established criteria. Students who attempted a variety of reasoning strategies such as causal reasoning, using an analogy, abductive reasoning, data reconstruction and concept combination, revised their alternative conception to a scientific conception after the reasoning activity. On the other hand, some students could not revise their alternative conceptions because they only conducted an incomplete reasoning strategy. The study also found that they were unable to use other reasoning strategies, either.

Keywords

References

  1. Barrow, L. and Haskins, S., 1996, Earthquake knowledge and experiences of introductory geology students. Journal of College Science Teaching, 26, 143-146.
  2. Blake, A., 2005, Do young children's ideas about the Earth's structure and processes reveal underlying patterns of descriptive and causal understanding in earth science? Research in Science and Technological Education, 23, 59-74. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635140500068450
  3. Chen, C.-T. and She, H.-C., 2014, The effectiveness of scientific inquiry with/without integration of scientific reasoning. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 12, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-012-9391-7
  4. Clark, S.K., Libarkin, J.C., Kortz, K.M., and Jordan, S.C., 2011, Alternative conceptions of plate tectonics held by nonscience undergraduates. Journal of geoscience education, 59, 251-262. https://doi.org/10.5408/1.3651696
  5. Engelhardt, W.V. and Zimmermann, J., 1982, Theory of earth science. Cambridge University, Cambridge, UK, 389 p.
  6. Gilbert, J.K., Boulter, C., and Rutherford, M., 1998, Models in explanations, part 1: Horses for courses. International Journal of Science Education, 20, 83-97. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069980200106
  7. Gobert, J.D., 2000, A typology of causal models for plate tectonics: Inferential power and barriers to understanding. International Journal of Science Education, 22, 937-977. https://doi.org/10.1080/095006900416857
  8. Gobert, J.D., 2005, The effects of different learning tasks on model-building in plate tectonics: Diagramming versus explaining. Journal of Geoscience Education, 53, 444-455. https://doi.org/10.5408/1089-9995-53.4.444
  9. Gobert, J.D. and Clement, J.J., 1999, Effects of studentgenerated diagrams versus student-generated summaries on conceptual understanding of causal and dynamic knowledge in plate tectonics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36, 39-53. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199901)36:1<39::AID-TEA4>3.0.CO;2-I
  10. Hegarty, M. and Just, M.A., 1993, Constructing mental models of machines from text and diagrams. Journal of Memory and Language, 32, 717-742. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1993.1036
  11. Jeong, S.-H., Choi, H.-D., and Yang, I.-H., 2011, An analysis of abductive reasoning on the inquiry of scientists and elementary school gifted children in science. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 31, 901-919. (in Korean)
  12. Jeong, K.-S. and Jeong, J.-W., 2007, Alternative conceptions of high school students about the crust and interior of the Earth. Journal of the Korean Earth Science Society, 28, 266-276. (in Korean) https://doi.org/10.5467/JKESS.2007.28.3.266
  13. Jeong, K.-J., Jeong, K.-S., and Moon, B.-C., 2007, Misconceptions of the freshmen at high school about plate tectonics. Journal of the Korean Earth Science Society, 28, 762-774. (in Korean) https://doi.org/10.5467/JKESS.2007.28.7.762
  14. Johnson, T.R. and Krems, J.F., 2001, Use of current explanations in multicausal abductive reasoning. Cognitive Science, 25, 903-939. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog2506_2
  15. Kim, C.-J., 2002, Inferences frequently used in earth science. Journal of the Korean Earth Science Society, 23, 188-193. (in Korean)
  16. Kintsch, W., 1988, The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension: A construction-integration model. Psychological Review, 95, 163-182. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.95.2.163
  17. Lee, M.-S., 2014, Conceptions of plate tectonics in high school student using visual representation. Unpublished M.S. thesis, Korea National University of Education, Chungbuk, Korea, 95 p. (in Korean)
  18. Lee, H.-Y., Cho, H.-J., and Park, M.-R., 2012, An analysis of 10th grade students' understanding of concepts about the plates' motions according to the level of spatial ability. Journal of the Korean Earth Science Society, 33, 360-375. (in Korean) https://doi.org/10.5467/JKESS.2012.33.4.360
  19. Lee, S.-K., Choi, C.-I., Lee, G.-H., Shin, M.-K., and Song, H.-J., 2013, Exploring scientific reasoning in elementary science classroom discourses. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 33, 181-192. (in Korean) https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2013.33.1.181
  20. Lee, G.-H. and Kwon, B.-D., 2010, Reasoning-based inquiry model embedded in Earth Science phenomena. Journal of the Korean Earth Science Society, 31, 185-202. (in Korean) https://doi.org/10.5467/JKESS.2010.31.2.185
  21. Libarkin, J.C., Anderson, S., Dahl, J., Beilfuss, M., and Boone, W., 2005, Qualitative analysis of college students' ideas about the Earth: Interviews and openended questionnaires. Journal of Geoscience Education, 53, 17-26. https://doi.org/10.5408/1089-9995-53.1.17
  22. Libarkin, J.C. and Matthew, H.S., 2012, Elementary children's retrodictive reasoning about Earth Science. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 5, 47-62.
  23. Lillo, J., 1994, An analysis of the annotated drawings of the internal structure of the Earth made by students aged 10-5 from primary and secondary schools in Spain. Teaching Earth Science, 19, 83-87.
  24. Maeng, S.-H., Park, M.-S., Lee, J.-A., and Kim, C.-J., 2007, A case study of middle school students` abductive inference during a geological field excursion. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 27, 818-831. (in Korean)
  25. Magnani, L., 2001, Abduction, reason, and science: Process of discovery and explanation. Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, NY, USA, 205 p.
  26. Nelson, B.D., Aron, R.H., and Francek, M.A., 1992, Clarification of selected misconceptions in physical geography. Journal of Geography, 91, 76-90. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221349208979083
  27. Norman, D.A., 1983, Some observations on mental models. In Gentner, D. and Stevens, A.L. (eds.), Mental models. Hillsdales, NJ, USA, 7-14.
  28. Oh, P.-S., 2006, Rule-inferring strategies for abductive reasoning in the process of solving an earthenvironmental problem, Journal of Korea Association for Research in Science Education, 26, 546-558. (in Korean)
  29. Oh, P.-S. and Kim, C.-J., 2005, A theoretical study on abduction as an inquiry method in Earth Science. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 25, 610-623. (in Korean)
  30. Oh, P.-S. and Oh, S.-J., 2011, A study on the processes of elaborating hypotheses in abductive inquiry of preservice elementary school teachers. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 31, 128-142. (in Korean)
  31. Park, S.-K., 2009, An analysis of high school students' mental models on the plate boundaries. Journal of the Korean Earth Science Society, 30, 111-126. (in Korean) https://doi.org/10.5467/JKESS.2009.30.1.111
  32. Park, S.-K., 2011, An analysis of the mental models of middle school students with different learning style on plate tectonics. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 31, 734-744. (in Korean)
  33. Peirce, C.S., 1955, Abduction and induction. In Buchler, J. (ed.), Philosophical writings of Peirce. Dover Publisher, NY, USA, 136-150.
  34. Peng, Y. and Reggia, J.A., 1990, Abductive inference models for diagnostic problem-solving. Springer, NY, USA, 268 p.
  35. Ross, K.E.K. and Shuell, T.J., 1993, Children's beliefs about earthquakes. Science Education, 77, 191-205. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730770207
  36. Samarapungavan, A., Vosniadou, S., and Brewer, W.F., 1996, Mental models of the Earth, Sun, and Moon: Indian children's cosmologies. Cognitive Development, 11, 491-521. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0885-2014(96)90015-5
  37. Sibley, D., 2005, Visual abilities and misconceptions about plate tectonics. Journal of Geoscience Education, 53, 471-477. https://doi.org/10.5408/Sibley_v53p471
  38. Smith, G.A. and Bermea, S.B., 2012, Using students' sketches to recognize alternative conceptions about Plate Tectonics persisting from prior instruction. Journal of Geoscience Education, 60, 350-359. https://doi.org/10.5408/11-251.1
  39. Sutopo, S. and Waldrip, B., 2013, Impact of a representational approach on students' reasoning and conceptual understanding in learning mechanics. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 12, 741-765.
  40. Thagard, P., 1989, Explanatory coherence. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 12, 435-502. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00057046
  41. Trend, R., 2000, Conceptions of geological time among primary teacher trainees, with reference to their engagement with geoscience, history, and science. International Journal of Science Education, 22, 539-55. https://doi.org/10.1080/095006900289778
  42. Vosniadou, S., 1994, Capturing and modeling the process of conceptual change. Learning and Instruction, 4, 45-69. https://doi.org/10.1016/0959-4752(94)90018-3
  43. Vosniadou, S., 1999, Conceptual change research; state of the art and future direction. In Schnotz, W., Vosniadou, S., and Carretero, M. (eds.), New perspectives on conceptual change. Pergamon, NY, USA, 3-13.
  44. Vosniadou S., Skopeliti, I., and Ikospentaki, K., 2005, Reconsidering the role of artifacts in reasoning: Children's understanding of the globe as a model of the Earth. Learning and Instruction, 15, 333-351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2005.07.004