보건교육건강증진학회지 (Korean Journal of Health Education and Promotion)

  • 제31권3호
  • /
  • Pages.83-95
  • /
  • 2014
  • /
  • 1229-4128(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2635-5302(eISSN)
한국보건교육건강증진학회 (Korean Society for Health Education and Promotion)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

국민건강증진기금 운영과 개선방향에 대한 전문가의 인식

Experts View and Recommendation for Management and Operation of National Health Promotion Fund

  • Kim, Hye-Ryun (Korean Institute of Health and Social Affairs) ;
  • Yeo, Jiyoung (Korean Institute of Health and Social Affairs)
  • 투고 : 2014.07.30
  • 심사 : 2014.09.16
  • 발행 : 2014.09.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Objectives: This study was to examine the experts perception on the operation of the national health promotion fund and related policies, and to obtain the perspective on the improving governance of the fund. Methods: Experts opinion survey was recruited 120 experts who were public health officials, and members of board in academic societies related to health promotion and health policy, and 60 experts participated in the survey. Results: Most health care experts agreed that the current allocation of health promotion fund was not optimal with its lack of allocation on promoting healthy lifestyle and R&D for health promotion, while the majority of the fund was being spent on supporting national health insurance. Thus, establishing governance system and control tower for the fund was viewed as critical. Also the status of deliberation committee should be raised to higher position where it can hold practical authority to plan and evaluate fund spending. Conclusions: The priority of health promotion fund spending should be more on improving health such as modifying life-style and spreading healthy habits, rather than on disease management or subsidizing health insurance. It is recommended that change from to environment in health promotion policy regime is required to establish effective governance system for the fund operation.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Bae, S.S. (2013), Status and policy tasks of health promotion program in community, 50th symposium in Korean Academy of health policy and management
  2. Canada Advisory Committee on Population Health and Health Security (2005). The Integrated Pan-Canadian Healthy Living Strategy. The Secretariat for the Intersectoral Healthy Living Network in partnership with the F/P/T Healthy Living Task Group and the F/P/T Advisory Committee on Population Health and Health Security(ACPHHS).
  3. Choi, E..J., Chea, H. R., Park, J.Y., Jackle Green & Katrin Engelhardt (2011), Health promotion policy development in accordance with the program shift from curative measures to preventive measures, Korean Institute of Health and Social Affairs
  4. Earl, R, B (2012), The Practice of Social Research 13th, Cengage Learning
  5. HealthWay (2012), Annual report 2012, Healthway
  6. Jeong (2008), The Review of the Health Promotion Foundation and Implication for Korea, Korean Journal of health education and promotion
  7. Keleher, H & murphy, B (2004). Understanding Health: A Determinants Approach, Oxford University Press, USA
  8. Kim (2008), Model and policy of health promotion, 1st health promotion policy forum
  9. Kim (2012), Advance plan of health promotion program, 48th symposium in Korean Academy of health policy and management
  10. Lee K.S (2003), A study on efficient management and development strategies of health promotion fund, yonsei university
  11. Lee, J.Y., Jeong, A.S. & Kim, H..J. (2007), The future direction of health promotion fund, Korean Journal of health education and promotion
  12. Lee & Oh (2011), Effective management way and finance of Health Promotion Fund, Ministry of Health and Welfare
  13. Lee, S.Y., Lee, J. Y., Joe, S. Y., Lee, S. H., Oh, Y. I. & Jang, J.Y. (2012), Strengthening the Health promotion service delivery system in Korea, Korean Institute of Health and Social Affairs
  14. Ministry of Health and Welfare (2013), Budget and fund operation plan in Ministry of Health and Welfare, Ministry of Health and Welfare
  15. Ministry of Strategy and Finance (2013), Evaluation of fund operation 2013, Ministry of Strategy and Finance
  16. NABO (2013), Analysis of budget in government department, National Assembly Budget Office
  17. National Prevention Council (2011). http://www.surgeongeneral.gov/initiatives/prevention/2011-annua l-status-report-nphpphc.pdf (access on June, 2014)
  18. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (2011), OECD Reviews of health system Switzerland 2011, OECD
  19. SEATCA (2011), Lessons Learned in Establishing a Health Promotion Fund, Southeast Asia Tobacco Control Alliance
  20. Thaihealth (2012), Ten-year review of Thaihealth Promotion Foundation
  21. Tchoe, B. H. (2007), Governance and management system of Health investment, Korean Institute of Health and Social Affairs
  22. VicHealth (2013), Vichealth annual report 2012, VicHealth