Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention

Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention (아시아태평양암예방학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Standard based Deposit Guideline for Distribution of Human Biological Materials in Cancer Patients

  • Seo, Hwa Jeong (Medical Informatics and health Technology (MIT), Department of Healthcare Management, College of Social Science, Gachon University) ;
  • Kim, Hye Hyeon (Seoul National University Biomedical Informatics (SNUBI), Seoul National University College of Medicine) ;
  • Im, Jeong Soo (Department of Preventive Medicine, Gachon University) ;
  • Kim, Ju Han (Seoul National University Biomedical Informatics (SNUBI), Seoul National University College of Medicine)
  • Published : 2014.07.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Background: Human biological materials from cancer patients are linked directly with public health issues in medical science research as foundational resources so securing "human biological material" is truly important in bio-industry. However, because South Korea's national R and D project lacks a proper managing system for establishing a national standard for the outputs of certain processes, high-value added human biological material produced by the national R and D project could be lost or neglected. As a result, it is necessary to develop a managing process, which can be started by establishing operating guidelines to handle the output of human biological materials. Materials and Methods: The current law and regulations related to submitting research outcome resources was reviewed, and the process of data 'acquisition' and data 'distribution' from the point of view of big data and health 2.0 was examined in order to arrive at a method for switching paradigms to better utilize human biological materials. Results: For the deposit of biological research resources, the original process was modified and a standard process with relative forms was developed. With deposit forms, research information, researchers, and deposit type are submitted. The checklist's 26 items are provided for publishing. This is a checklist of items that should be addressed in deposit reports. Lastly, XML-based deposit procedure forms were designed and developed to collect data in a structured form, to help researchers distribute their data in an electronic way. Conclusions: Through guidelines included with the plan for profit sharing between depositor and user it is possible to manage the material effectively and safely, so high-quality human biological material can be supplied and utilized by researchers from universities, industry and institutes. Furthermore, this will improve national competitiveness by leading to development in the national bio-science industry.

Keywords

References

  1. Data.go.kr. [cited at Jan. 6, 2014]. Available from: https://www.data.go.kr/
  2. Data.gov. [cited at Jan. 6, 2014]. Available from: http://www.data.gov/
  3. Denny JC, Ritchie MD, Basford MA, at el (2010). PheWAS: demonstrating the feasibility of a phenome-wide scan to discover gene-disease associations. Bioinformatics, 26, 1205-10. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btq126
  4. EuroBioBank. [cited at Jan. 6, 2014]. Available from: http://www.eurobiobank.org/
  5. ISBER (2012). Best practices for repositories: collection, storage, retrieval and distribution of biological materials for research. BIOPRESERVATION AND BIOBANKING. US: International Society of Biological and Environmental Repositories.
  6. KBN, Korea BioBank Network [Internet]. Osong, Korea; 2013 [cited at Jan. 6, 2014]. Available from: http://kbn.cdc.go.kr/
  7. Yoo KY, Shin HR, Chang SH, et al (2005). Genomic epidemiology cohorts in Korea: present and the future. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev, 6, 238-43.
  8. Yoo KY, Shin HR, Chang SH, et al (2002). Korean multi-center cancer cohort study including a biological materials bank (KMCC-I). Asian Pac J Cancer Prev, 3, 85-92.
  9. Lee JE, Kim JH, Hong EJ, et al (2012). National biobank of Korea: quality control programs of collected-human biospecimens. Osong Public Health Res Perspect, 3, 185-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phrp.2012.07.007
  10. Lee MJ (2011). Big data and the utilization of public data. Int Inf Secur, 2, 47-64.
  11. Hyun MK, Hwang JS, Kim JH, et al (2013). Survival outcomes after whole brain radiation therapy and/or stereotactic radiosurgery for cancer patients with metastatic brain tumors in Korea: a systematic review. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev, 14, 7401-7 https://doi.org/10.7314/APJCP.2013.14.12.7401
  12. Ministry of Science, ICT and Future Planning [partial amendment, Mar. 9, 2011] (2011). Act on development, management and utilization of biological resources.
  13. Ministry of Science, ICT and Future Planning [partial amendment, Mar. 9, 2011] (2011). Regulation on management of national research and development project, etc.
  14. NCI (2011). NCI Best practices for biospecimen resources [internet]. u.s.: national cancer institute. [cited at Jan. 6, 2014]. Available from: http://biospecimens.cancer.gov/bestpractices/2011-NCIBestPractices.pdf
  15. NIH (2013). Guidelines for human biospecimen storage and tracking within the nih intramural research program [internet]. u.s.: national institutes of health. [cited at Jan. 6, 2014]. Available from: http://sourcebook.od.nih.gov/oversight/BiospecimenGuidelines.pdf
  16. Ivan P, Kern T, Damijan M (2009). Comparison of paper-based and electronic data collection process in clinical trials: costs simulation study. Contemporary Clinical Trials, 30, 300-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cct.2009.03.008
  17. PCAST (2010). Designing a digial future: federally funded research and development in networking and information technology. US: President's Council of Advisors on Science and Technology.
  18. University of Essex (2009). Managing and sharing data, a best practice guide for researchers [Internet]. U.K. [cited at Jan. 6, 2014]. Available from: http://www.admin.ox.ac.uk/media/global/wwwadminoxacuk/localsites/researchdatamanagement/documents/managingsharing.pdf
  19. Watson RW, Kay EW, Smith D (2010). Integrating biobanks: addressing the practical and ethical issues to deliver a valuable tool for cancer research. Nat Rev Cancer, 10, 646-51. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrc2913
  20. Wolf SM, Brittney NC, Brian VN, et al (2012). Managing incidental findings and research results in genomic research involving biobanks and archived data sets. Genet Med, 14, 361-84. https://doi.org/10.1038/gim.2012.23
  21. Ministry of Health and Welfare [partial amendment, Aug. 4, 2011] (2011). Health and medical service technology promotion act.
  22. Swedish Biobank (2014). [cited at Jan. 6, 2014]. Available from: http://www.biobanks.se/
  23. UK BioBank (2014). [cited at Jan. 6, 2014]. Available from: http://www.ukbiobank.ac.uk/
  24. Hughes B, Joshi I, Wareham J (2008). Health 2.0 and medicine 2.0: tensions and controversies in the Field. J Med Int Res, 6, 23.