DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Design of a Moving-magnet Electromagnetic Actuator for Fast Steering Mirror through Finite Element Simulation Method

  • Long, Yongjun (The State Key Laboratory of Mechanical System and Vibration, School of Mechanical Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University) ;
  • Mo, Jinqiu (The State Key Laboratory of Mechanical System and Vibration, School of Mechanical Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University) ;
  • Wei, Xiaohui (The State Key Laboratory of Mechanical System and Vibration, School of Mechanical Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University) ;
  • Wang, Chunlei (The State Key Laboratory of Mechanical System and Vibration, School of Mechanical Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University) ;
  • Wang, Shigang (The State Key Laboratory of Mechanical System and Vibration, School of Mechanical Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University)
  • Received : 2014.06.03
  • Accepted : 2014.07.24
  • Published : 2014.09.30

Abstract

This paper develops a moving-magnet electromagnetic actuator for fast steering mirror (FSM). The actuator achieves a reasonable compromise between voice coil actuator and piezoelectric actuator. The stroke of the actuator is between the strokes of a piezoelectric actuator and a voice coil actuator, and its force output is a linear function of air gap and excitation current within our FSM travel range. Additionally, the actuator is more reliable than voice coil actuator as the electrical connection in the actuator is static. Analytically modeling the actuator is difficult and time-consuming. Alternatively, numerous finite element simulations are carried out for the actuator analysis and design. According to the design results, a real prototype of the actuator is fabricated. An experimental test system is then built. Using the test system, the force output of the fabricated actuator is evaluated. The test results validate the actuator analysis and design.

Keywords

References

  1. G. C. Loney, Proc. SPIE 1454, 198 (1991).
  2. M. Hafe, T. C. Sidler, R. P. Salathé, G. L. M. Jansen, and J. C. Compter, Mechatronics 10, 741 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0957-4158(99)00093-8
  3. K. Aoki, Y. Yanagita, H. Kuroda, and K. Shiratama, Proc. SPIE 5160, 495 (2004).
  4. X. Wu, S. Chen, B. Shi, W. Chen, and X. Xiong, Opt. Eng. 50, 023002 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1117/1.3544587
  5. Y. Lu, D. Fan, and Z. Zhang, Optik 124, 2443 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijleo.2012.08.023
  6. H. Marth and M. Donat, Proc. SPIE 1543, 248 (1991).
  7. C. T. Wood, G. C. Homer, and W. W. Clark, Proc. SPIE 3674, 196 (1999).
  8. S. Woody, and S. Smith, Mechatronics 16, 389 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechatronics.2006.03.006
  9. S. Bing, R. Weibin, G. Bin, R. Changhai, and S. Lining, Smart Mater. Struct. 17, 025032 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1088/0964-1726/17/2/025032
  10. S. Bing, C. Liguo, R. Weibin, R. Changhai, and X. Min, Smart Mater. Struct. 18, 035009 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1088/0964-1726/18/3/035009
  11. P. Bandera, Proc. 8th European Space Mechanisms and Tribology Symposium ESA, SP-438 (1999).
  12. D. J. Kluk, M. T. Boulet, and D. L. Trumper, Mechatronics 22, 257 (2009).
  13. X. Lu, Ph.D. Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, America (2005).
  14. D. Wu, X. Xie, and S. Zhou, IEEE Trans. Magn. 46, 1007 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1109/TMAG.2009.2036606