Journal of Digital Convergence (디지털융복합연구)

The Society of Digital Policy and Management (한국디지털정책학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Product Risk Assessment based on Scenario for Safety Management

제품안전관리를 위한 시나리오 기반의 리스크 평가기법 연구

  • Suh, Jungdae (School of Business Administration, Gachon University)
  • 서정대 (가천대학교 경영대학 경영학과)
  • Received : 2014.06.03
  • Accepted : 2014.08.20
  • Published : 2014.08.28
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

In this study, a risk assessment method based on scenario for the product safety management in Korea has been developed and proposed. To this end, Korea's related regulations for product safety management should be analyzed first, and the risk assessment method necessary for the enforcement of the regulations is presented by itemizing the method into the case of general injury and toxic substances. The features of the method presented in this study are as follows: (i) It is a method based on the injury scenario which can occur during the use of product. (ii) It assesses a risk based on the probability of the scenario and the severity of injury. (iii) In the case of toxic substances, it assesses a risk considering the hazard of the toxic substances on the human body and the severity of injury. To determine the probability of the injury scenario, this study has decomposed the scenario into several configuration factors and estimates each factor's probability to calculate the whole scenario's probability. The results of risk assessment through the method of this study are presented and it is shown that the method can be applied to the product classification for the product safety management.

본 연구에서는 한국의 제품 안전관리를 위한 시나리오 기반의 리스크 평가기법을 개발, 제시한다. 이를 위해 먼저 한국의 제품 안전관리를 위한 관련 규제정책을 살펴보고, 이 법의 시행을 위해 필요한 제품 리스크 평가기법을 일반상해의 경우와 유해물질의 경우로 구분하여 제시한다. 본 연구에서 제시되는 리스크 평가기법의 특징은 다음과 같다. (i) 제품의 사용 시 발생할 수 있는 부상 시나리오에 기반을 둔 방법이다. (ii) 시나리오 발생 확률과 인체에 미치는 부상 심각도를 바탕으로 리스크를 평가한다. (iii) 유해물질 함유 제품의 경우 유해물질의 인체에의 위해성 여부를 확인한 후 부상 심각도를 고려해서 리스크를 평가한다. 부상 시나리오의 확률을 결정하기 위하여 본 연구에서는 시나리오를 몇 가지 구성 요인으로 분해하고 이들 각각의 요인 확률을 추정하여 전체 시나리오의 확률을 결정한다. 본 연구에서 제시된 기법을 통하여 리스크 평가를 수행한 결과를 제시하고 이를 제품 안전관리를 위한 품목 분류에 활용할 수 있음을 보인다.

Keywords

References

  1. Korea Agency for Technology and Standards, Quality Management and Industrial Product Safety Control Act, 2013.
  2. European Commission, Risk Assessment Guidelines for Consumer Products, Official Journal of the European Union, 2010.
  3. Product Safety Enforcement Forum of Europe, Best Practice Techniques in Market Surveillance, The EMARS book, 2011.
  4. Risk Assessment Handbook, Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry, Japan, 2011.
  5. P. Morfee, The New Zealand Electrical Products Risk Engine, International Conference on Risk Assessment and Management, Swiss, Nov. 2009.
  6. JSC EEE, ASEAN EEE Risk Assessment Guidelines, APEC-RISK Assessment Tool Workshop, Singapore, May 2012.
  7. X. Liu, W. Tang, H. Luo, Research on progress of risk assessment on consumer product safety at home and abroad, 9th International Conference on Reliability, Maintainability and Safety (ICRMS), China, pp. 599-605, Jun. 2011.
  8. M. C. Embarek, E. A. Hadjadj, Study of Methodologies for Risk Assessment in Operational System Safety, Journal of Failure Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 10, pp. 540-544, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11668-010-9397-9
  9. F. H. Duijne, D. Aken, E. G. Schouten, Considerations in developing complete and quantified methods for risk assessment, Safety Science, Vol. 46, pp. 245-254, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2007.05.003
  10. B. W. Main, Risk Assessment: A review of the fundamental principles, Professional Safety, Vol. 49, No. 12, pp. 37-47, 2004.
  11. S. McRoberts, Risk management of product safety, IEEE Symposium on Product Safety Engineering, UK, pp. 65-71, Oct. 2005.
  12. J. M. Burns, Product safety guidelines for prototype and limited use commercial devices, IEEE Symposium on Product Compliance Engineering (PSES), Oct. 2011, USA, pp. 1-13, 2011.
  13. D. E. Nordgard, A framework for risk-informed decision support in electricity distribution companies utilizing input from quantitative risk assessment, Electrical Power and Energy Systems, Vol. 43, pp. 255-261, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijepes.2012.05.018
  14. K. S. Park, I. H. Cho, U. H. Kim, A Study on the Risk Analysis Techniques for Products: Development of HuBRA (Human Behavior Risk Analysis), Journal of the KIIS, Vol. 18, No. 3, pp. 141-148, 2003.
  15. J. G. Kim, C. S. Kim, A Study on the Risk Analysis System, Conference of the Korea Safety Management & Science, pp. 237-244, 2004.
  16. D. H. Lee, Y. G. Na, M. S. Kim, A Study on a Product Safety Management Program Based on Risk Management Standards, IE Interfaces, Vol. 16, No. 1, pp. 94-102, 2003.
  17. D. J. Shin, S. N. Byun, A study of the product hazard analysis using AHP method, Proceedings of the KIIE, pp. 876-880, 2004.
  18. C. J. Lim, B. K. Koh, Petri-nets based Product Safety Analysis, Journal of the Society of Korea Industrial and Systems Engineering, Vol. 29, No. 3, pp. 1-6, 2006.
  19. Y. H. Lee, Principle and Systemof Risk Evaluation for Product Safety, Ergonomics Society of Korea Conference, 2002.
  20. Korean Agency for Technology and Standards, Research Report on Policy Measures supporting Company's Risk Management, 2011.
  21. Korean Agency for Technology and Standards, Research Report on Risk Assessment Model for Product Safety Management, 2012.
  22. Korean Agency for Technology and Standards, Research Report on Product Risk Case Analysis and Safety Measures, 2012.
  23. Product Safety Information Center, http://www.safetykorea.kr.
  24. Korea Products Safety Association, http://www. ksafety.kr.
  25. European Commission, http://webgate.ec.europa.eu /sanco/heidi/index.php/IDB.
  26. EuroSafe, http://www.eurosafe.eu.com..
  27. J. P. Rushton, C. D. Ankney, Brain size and cognitive ability: Correlations with age, sex, social class, arid race, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, Vol. 3, No. 1, pp. 21-36, 1996. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03210739
  28. E. A. Elsayed, Reliability Engineering, Wiley, 1996.
  29. EPA, Guidelines for Exposure Assessment, EPA/600/Z-92/001, May 1992.
  30. EPA, Guidance for Conduction Health Risk Assessment of Chemical Mixtures, EPA/630/R-00/002, Aug. 2000.
  31. TOXNET(Toxicology Data Network), United States National Library of Medicine, http://toxnet. nlm.nih.gov/cgi-bin/sis/htmlgen?iter.