Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics

The Korean Academy of Conservative Dentistry (대한치과보존학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Comparative analysis of physicochemical properties of root perforation sealer materials

  • Received : 2014.03.07
  • Accepted : 2014.05.11
  • Published : 2014.08.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Objectives: This study evaluated the solubility, dimensional alteration, pH, electrical conductivity, and radiopacity of root perforation sealer materials. Materials and Methods: For the pH test, the samples were immersed in distilled water for different periods of time. Then, the samples were retained in plastic recipients, and the electrical conductivity of the solution was measured. The solubility, dimensional alteration, and radiopacity properties were evaluated according to Specification No. 57 of the American National Standards Institute/American Dental Association (ANSI/ADA). Statistical analyses were carried out using analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey's test at a significance level of 5%. When the sample distribution was not normal, a nonparametric ANOVA was performed with a Kruskal-Wallis test (${\alpha}$ = 0.05). Results: The results showed that white structural Portland cement (PC) had the highest solubility, while mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA)-based cements, ProRoot MTA (Dentsply-Tulsa Dental) and MTA BIO ($\hat{A}$ngelus Ind. Prod.), had the lowest values. MTA BIO showed the lowest dimensional alteration values and white PC presented the highest values. No differences among the tested materials were observed in the the pH and electrical conductivity analyses. Only the MTA-based cements met the ANSI/ADA recommendations regarding radiopacity, overcoming the three steps of the aluminum step wedge. Conclusions: On the basis of these results, we concluded that the values of solubility and dimensional alteration of the materials were in accordance with the ANSI/ADA specifications. PCs did not fulfill the ANSI/ADA requirements regarding radiopacity. No differences were observed among the materials with respect to the pH and electrical conductivity analyses.

Keywords

References

  1. Krupp C, Bargholz C, Brusehaber M, Hulsmann M. Treatment outcome after repair of root perforations with mineral trioxide aggregate: a retrospective evaluation of 90 teeth. J Endod 2013;39:1364-1368. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2013.06.030
  2. Park DS, Sohn SJ, Oh TS, Yoo HM, Park CJ, Yim SH, Lee YK, Kye SB. An electrochemical study of the sealing ability of three retrofilling materials. J Korean Acad Conserv Dent 2004;29:365-369. https://doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2004.29.4.365
  3. Darvell BW, Wu RC. "MTA"-an Hydraulic Silicate Cement: review update and setting reaction. Dent Mater 2011; 27:407-422. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2011.02.001
  4. Malhotra N, Agarwal A, Mala K. Mineral trioxide aggregate: a review of physical properties. Compend Contin Educ Dent 2013;34:e25-32.
  5. Borges AH, Pedro FL, Miranda CE, Semenoff-Segundo A, Pecora JD, Filho AM. Comparative study of physicochemical properties of MTA-based and Portland cements. Acta Odontol Latinoam 2010;23:175-181.
  6. Parirokh M, Torabinejad M. Mineral trioxide aggregate: a comprehensive literature review-Part III: Clinical applications, drawbacks, and mechanism of action. J Endod 2010;36:400-413. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2009.09.009
  7. Camilleri J. Hydration mechanisms of mineral trioxide aggregate. Int Endod J 2007;40:462-470. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2007.01248.x
  8. Lee JH, Shon WJ, Lee W, Baek SH. The effect of several root-end filling materials on MG63 osteoblast-like cells. J Korean Acad Conserv Dent 2010;35:222-228. https://doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2010.35.3.222
  9. Saxena P, Gupta SK, Newaskar V. Biocompatibility of root-end filling materials: recent update. Restor Dent Endod 2013;38:119-127. https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2013.38.3.119
  10. Song M, Yoon TS, Kim SY, Kim E. Cytotoxicity of newly developed pozzolan cement and other root-end filling materials on human periodontal ligament cell. Restor Dent Endod 2014;39:39-44. https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2014.39.1.39
  11. Cavenago BC, Pereira TC, Duarte MA, Ordinola-Zapata R, Marciano MA, Bramante CM, Bernardineli N. Influence of powder-to-water ratio on radiopacity, setting time, pH, calcium ion release and a micro-CT volumetric solubility of white mineral trioxide aggregate. Int Endod J 2014;47:120-126. https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.12120
  12. Silva Neto JD, Brito RH, Schnaider TB, Gragnani A, Engelman M, Ferreira LM. Root perforations treatment using mineral trioxide aggregate and Portland cements. Acta Cir Bras 2010;25:479-484. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-86502010000600004
  13. Silva Neto JD, Schnaider TB, Gragnani A, Paiva AP, Novo NF, Ferreira LM. Portland cement with additives in the repair of furcation perforations in dogs. Acta Cir Bras 2012;27:809-814. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-86502012001100011
  14. Camilleri J, Montesin FE, Di Silvio L, Pitt Ford TR. The chemical constitution and biocompatibility of accelerated Portland cement for endodontic use. Int Endod J 2005;38:834-842. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2005.01028.x
  15. Torabinejad M, Watson TF, Pitt Ford TR. Sealing ability of a mineral trioxide aggregate when used as a root end filling material. J Endod 1993;19:591-595. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(06)80271-2
  16. Chang SW. Chemical characteristics of mineral trioxide aggregate and its hydration reaction. Restor Dent Endod 2012;37:188-193. https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2012.37.4.188
  17. Estrela C, Bammann LL, Estrela CR, Silva RS, Pecora JD. Antimicrobial and chemical study of MTA, Portland cement, calcium hydroxide paste, Sealapex and Dycal. Braz Dent J 2000;11:3-9.
  18. Camilleri J, Pitt Ford TR. Mineral trioxide aggregate: a review of the constituents and biological properties of the material. Int Endod J 2006;39:747-754. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2006.01135.x
  19. ABCP. Basic guide of Portland cement utilization. 7th ed. Sao Paulo: Brazilian Association of Portland Cement; 2002. p28.
  20. Garboczi EJ, Bullard JW. Shape analysis of a reference cement. Cem Concr Res 2004;34:1933-1937. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2004.01.006
  21. Borges AH, Pedro FL, Semanoff-Segundo A, Miranda CE, Pecora JD, Cruz Filho AM. Radiopacity evaluation of Portland and MTA-based cements by digital radiographic system. J Appl Oral Sci 2011;19:228-232. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1678-77572011000300009
  22. Dammaschke T, Gerth HU, Zuchner H, Schafer E. Chemical and physical surface and bulk material characterization of white ProRoot MTA and two Portland cements. Dent Mater 2005;21:731-738. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2005.01.019
  23. ANSI/ADA. Specification No. 57. Endodontic sealing materials. Chicago: American Dental Association Publishing; 2000.
  24. Carvalho-Junior JR, Correr-Sobrinho L, Correr AB, Sinhoreti MA, Consani S, Sousa-Neto MD. Solubility and dimensional change after setting of root canal sealers: a proposal for smaller dimensions of test samples. J Endod 2007;33:1110-1116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2007.06.004
  25. Tanomaru-Filho M, da Silva GF, Duarte MA, Goncalves M, Tanomaru JM. Radiopacity evaluation of root-end filling materials by digitization of images. J Appl Oral Sci 2008;16:376-379. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1678-77572008000600004
  26. Islam I, Chng HK, Yap AU. Comparison of the physical and mechanical properties of MTA and portland cement. J Endod 2006;32:193-197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2005.10.043
  27. Hwang YC, Lee SH, Hwang IN, Kang IC, Kim MS, Kim SH, Son HH, Oh WM. Chemical composition, radiopacity, and biocompatibility of Portland cement with bismuth oxide. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2009;107:e96-102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2008.11.015
  28. Kogan P, He J, Glickman GN, Watanabe I. The effects of various additives on setting properties of MTA. J Endod 2006;32:569-572. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2005.08.006
  29. Duarte MA, Alves de Aguiar K, Zeferino MA, Vivan RR, Ordinola-Zapata R, Tanomaru-Filho M, Weckwerth PH, Kuga MC. Evaluation of the propylene glycol association on some physical and chemical properties of mineral trioxide aggregate. Int Endod J 2012;45:565-570. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2012.02012.x
  30. Fridland M, Rosado R. Mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) solubility and porosity with different water-to-powder ratios. J Endod 2003;29:814-817. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004770-200312000-00007
  31. de Martins GR, Carvalho CA, Valera MC, de Oliveira LD, Buso L, Carvalho AS. Sealing ability of castor oil polymer as a root-end filling material. J Appl Oral Sci 2009;17:220-223. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1678-77572009000300017
  32. Danesh G, Dammaschke T, Gerth HU, Zandbiglari T, Schäfer E. A comparative study of selected properties of ProRoot mineral trioxide aggregate and two Portland cements. Int Endod J 2006;39:213-219. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2006.01076.x
  33. Bortoluzzi EA, Broon NJ, Bramante CM, Felippe WT, Tanomaru Filho M, Esberard RM. The influence of calcium chloride on the setting time, solubility, disintegration, and pH of mineral trioxide aggregate and white Portland cement with a radiopacifier. J Endod 2009;35:550-554. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2008.12.018
  34. Fridland M, Rosado R. MTA solubility: a long term study. J Endod 2005;31:376-379. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.DON.0000140566.97319.3e
  35. Wiltbank KB, Schwartz SA, Schindler WG. Effect of selected accelerants on the physical properties of mineral trioxide aggregate and Portland cement. J Endod 2007;33:1235-1238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2007.06.016
  36. Duarte MA, Demarchi AC, Yamashita JC, Kuga MC, Fraga Sde C. pH and calcium ion release of 2 root-end filling materials. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2003;95:345-347. https://doi.org/10.1067/moe.2003.12
  37. Estrela C, Sousa-Neto MD, Guedes OA, Alencar AH, Duarte MA, Pecora JD. Characterization of calcium oxide in root perforation sealer materials. Braz Dent J 2012;23:539-546. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-64402012000500012
  38. Santos AD, Moraes JC, Araujo EB, Yukimitu K, Valerio Filho WV. Physico-chemical properties of MTA and a novel experimental cement. Int Endod J 2005;38:443-447. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2005.00963.x
  39. Goncalves JL, Viapiana R, Miranda CE, Borges AH, Cruz Filho AM. Evaluation of physico-chemical properties of Portland cements and MTA. Braz Oral Res 2010;24:277-283. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1806-83242010000300004
  40. Hungaro Duarte MA, de Oliveira El Kadre GD, Vivan RR, Guerreiro Tanomaru JM, Tanomaru Filho M, de Moraes IG. Radiopacity of portland cement associated with different radiopacifying agents. J Endod 2009;35:737-740. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2009.02.006

Cited by

  1. Portland cement versus MTA as a root-end filling material. A pilot study vol.30, pp.2, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-865020150020000011
  2. The use of a biocompatible cement in endodontic surgery. A randomized clinical trial 1 vol.31, pp.6, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-865020160060000010
  3. Evaluation of Sealing Effect and Working Time of Root Canal Filling MTA Materials vol.43, pp.2, 2016, https://doi.org/10.5933/JKAPD.2016.43.2.129
  4. Effects of the addition of nanoparticulate calcium carbonate on setting time, dimensional change, compressive strength, solubility and pH of MTA vol.50, pp.1, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.12594
  5. A micro-computed tomographic study using a novel test model to assess the filling ability and volumetric changes of bioceramic root repair materials vol.46, pp.1, 2021, https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2021.46.e2