참고문헌
- Gomez, P., Ratcliff, R., & Perea, M. (2008). The overlap model: A model of letter position coding. Psychological Review, 115, 577-601. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0012667
- Davis, C. J., & Bowers, J. S. (2004). What do letter migration errors reveal about letter position coding in visual word recognition? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 30, 923-941. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.30.5.923
- Davis, C. J., & Bowers, J. S. (2006). Contrasting five different theories of letter position coding: Evidence from orthographic similarity effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32, 535-557. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.32.3.535
- Frankish, C., & Turner, E. (2007). SIHGT and SUNOD: The role of orthography and phonology in the perception of transposed letter anagrams. Journal of Memory and Language, 56, 189-211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2006.11.002
- Grainger, J., & van Heuven, W. J. B. (2003). Modeling letter position coding in printed word perception. In P. Bonin (Ed.), Mental lexicon: "Some words to talk about words" (pp.1-23). New York: Nova Science.
- Grainger, J., & Whitney, C. (2004). Does the huamn mnid raed wrods as a wlohe?, Trends In Cognitive Sciences, 8, 58-59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2003.11.006
- Perea, M. & Carreiras, M. (1998). Effects of syllable frequency and syllable neighborhood frequency in visual word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 24, 134-144 https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.24.1.134
- Perea, M., & Carreiras, M. (2006a). Do transposed-letter effects occur across lexeme boundaries? Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13, 418-422. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193863
- Perea, M., & Carreiras, M. (2006b). Do transposed-letter similarity effects occur at a syllable level? Experimental Psychology, 53, 308-315 https://doi.org/10.1027/1618-3169.53.4.308
- Perea, M., & Lupker, S. J. (2004). Can CANISO activate CASINO? Transposed-letter similarity effects with non-adjacent letter positions. Journal of Memory and Language, 51, 231-246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2004.05.005
- Guerrera, C., & Forster, K. I. (2007). Masked form priming with extreme transposition, Language and Cognitive Processes, 23, 117-142.
- Christianson, K., Johnson, R. L., & Rayner, K. (2005). Letter transpositions within and across morphemes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 31, 1327-1339. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.31.6.1327
- Schoonbaert, S., & Grainger, J. (2004). Letter position coding in printed word perception: Effects of repeated and transposed letters. Language & Cognitive Processes, 19, 333-367. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960344000198
- Lee, C. H., & Taft, M. (2009). Are onsets and codas important in processing letter position? A comparison of TL effects in English and Korean. Journal of Memory and Language, 60, 530-542. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2009.01.002
- Lee, C. H., & Taft, M. (2011). Subsyllabic structure reflected in letter confusability effects in Korean word recognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 18, 129-134 https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-010-0028-y
- Velan, H., & Frost, R. (2007). Cambridge University versus Hebrew University: Impact of letter transposition on reading English and Hebrew. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14, 913-918. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03194121
- Velan, H., & Frost, R. (2011). Words with and without internal structure: What determine the nature of orthographic and morphological processing? Cognition, 118, 9141-156.
- Kinoshita, S., & Norris, D., (2010). Letter oreder is not coded by open bigrams. Journal of Memory and Language, 69, 135-150.
- Davis, C. J. (2010). The spatial coding model of visual word identification. Psychological Review, 117, 713-758. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019738
- Davis, C. J. (2010). SOLAR versus SERIOL revisited. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology 22 (5), 695-724. https://doi.org/10.1080/09541440903155682
- Whitney, C. (2008). Comparison of the SERIOL and SOLAR theories of letter-position encoding. Brain & Language, 107, 170-178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2007.08.002
- Treiman, R. (1986). The division between onsets and rimes in English syllables. Journal of Memory and Language, 25, 476-491. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-596X(86)90039-2
- Treiman, R., & Chafetz, J. (1987). Are there onset- and rime-like units in printed words. In M. Coltheart (Ed.), Attention and Performance, XII. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Limited.
- Fowler, C,A., Treiman, R., & Gross, J. (1993). The Structure of English Syllables and Polysyllables. Journal of Momory and Language, 32, 115-140. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1993.1007
- Treiman, R., Goswami, U., & Bruck. M. (1990). Not all nonwords are alike: Implications for reading development and theory. Memory & Cognition, 18, 559-567. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03197098
- Bowey, J. A. (1990). Orthographic onsets and rimes are functional units of reading. Memory and Cognition, 18, 419-427. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03197130
- Perea, M., & Acha, J. (2009). Space information is important for reading. Vision Research, 49, 1994-2000 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2009.05.009
- Perea, M., & Carreiras, M. (2008). Do orthotactics and phonology constrain the transposed-letter effect? Language and Cognitive Processes, 23, 69-92 https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960701578146
- Perea, M., & Perez, E. (2009). Beyond alphabetic orthographies: The role of form and phonology in transposition effects in Katakana. Language and Cognitive Processes, 24, 67-88. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960802053924
- Frankish, C., Turner, E. (2007). SIHGT and SUNOD: The role of orthography and phonology in the perception of transposed letter anagrams. Journal of Memory and Language, 56, 189-211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2006.11.002
- Grainger, J., Kiyonaga, K., & Holcomb, P. J. (2006). The Time Course of Orthographic and Phonological Code Activation. Psychological Science, 17, 1021-1026. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01821.x
- Berent, C. A., & Perfetti, C. A. (1995). A Rose is a REEZ: The two-cycles model of phonology assembly in reading English. Psychological Review, 107, 146-184.
- Lupker, S. J., Perea, M., & Davis, C. J. (2008). Transposed-letter effects: Consonants, vowels and letter frequency. Language and Cognitive Processes, 23, 93-116. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960701579714
- Feldman, L. B., & Soltano, E. G. (1999). Morphological priming: The role of prime duration, semantic transparency, and affix position. Brain and Language, 68, 33-39. https://doi.org/10.1006/brln.1999.2077
- Rastle, K., & Davis, M. H. (2003). Reading morphologically complex words: Some thoughts from masked priming. In Kinoshita, S. & Lupker, S. J. (Eds), Masked priming: The state of the art (pp. 279-305). New York: Psychology Press.
- Rastle, K., Davis, M., H., & New, B. (2004). The broth in my brother's brouthel: Morphological-orthographic segmentation in visual word recognition. Psychological Bulletin & Review, 11, 1090-1098. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196742
- Dunabeitia, J. A., Perea, M., & Carreiras, M. (2007). Do transposed-letter similarity effects occur at a morpheme level? Evidence for morpho-orthographic decomposition. Cognition, 105, 691-703. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2006.12.001
- Beyersmann, E., Mccormick, S. F., & Rastle, K. (in press). Letter transpositions within morphems and across morphem boundaries. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology.
- Kwon, Y., Lee, C. H., Jeon, M. & Lee, Y. (under review). The role of phonological information in letter transposition effects: An event-related potential investigation.
- Frost, R. (2012). Towards a universal model of reading. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 35, 263-279 https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X11001841
- Plaut, D. C., McClelland, J. L., Seidenberg, M. S., & Patterson, K. (1996). Understanding normal and impaired word reading: Computational principles in quasi-regular domains. Psychological Review, 103, 56-115. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.103.1.56
- Kim, K., Lee, Y., & Lee, C. (2012). Consideration of the linguistic characteristics of letters makes the universal model of reading more universal. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 35, 291-291. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X12000076
- Taft, M., & Krebs-Lazendic, L. (2013). The role of orthographic syllable structure in assigning letters to their position in visual word recognition. Journal of Memory & Language, 68, 85-97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2012.10.004
- Simpson, G., & Kang, H. (2004). Syllable processing in alphabetic Korean. Reading and Writing, 17, 137-151. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:READ.0000013808.65933.a1