DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

An Analysis of Factors Relating to Agricultural Machinery Farm-Work Accidents Using Logistic Regression

  • Kim, Byounggap (National Academy of Agricultural Science, Rural Development Administration) ;
  • Yum, Sunghyun (National Academy of Agricultural Science, Rural Development Administration) ;
  • Kim, Yu-Yong (National Academy of Agricultural Science, Rural Development Administration) ;
  • Yun, Namkyu (National Academy of Agricultural Science, Rural Development Administration) ;
  • Shin, Seung-Yeoub (National Academy of Agricultural Science, Rural Development Administration) ;
  • You, Seokcheol (National Academy of Agricultural Science, Rural Development Administration)
  • Received : 2014.08.01
  • Accepted : 2014.08.20
  • Published : 2014.09.01

Abstract

Purpose: In order to develop strategies to prevent farm-work accidents relating to agricultural machinery, influential factors were examined in this paper. The effects of these factors were quantified using logistic regression. Methods: Based on the results of a survey on farm-work accidents conducted by the National Academy of Agricultural Science, 21 tentative independent variables were selected. To apply these variables to regression, the presence of multicollinearity was examined by comparing correlation coefficients, checking the statistical significance of the coefficients in a simple linear regression model, and calculating the variance inflation factor. A logistic regression model and determination method of its goodness of fit was defined. Results: Among 21 independent variables, 13 variables were not collinear each other. The results of a logistic regression analysis using these variables showed that the model was significant and acceptable, with deviance of 714.053. Parameter estimation results showed that four variables (age, power tiller ownership, cognizance of the government's safety policy, and consciousness of safety) were significant. The logistic regression model predicted that the former two increased accident odds by 1.027 and 8.506 times, respectively, while the latter two decreased the odds by 0.243 and 0.545 times, respectively. Conclusions: Prevention strategies against factors causing an accident, such as the age of farmers and the use of a power tiller, are necessary. In addition, more efficient trainings to elevate the farmer's consciousness about safety must be provided.

Keywords

References

  1. Choi, S., Kim, M., Oh, C and K. Lee. 2013. Effects of weather and traffic conditions on truck accident severity on freeways. Journal of the Korean Society of Civil Engineering 33(3):1105-1113 (In Korean, with English abstract). https://doi.org/10.12652/Ksce.2013.33.3.1105
  2. Costello, T. M., Schulmanb, M. D and R. E. Mitchell. 2009. Risk factors for a farm vehicle public road crash. Accident Analysis and Prevention 41(1):42-47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2008.08.029
  3. Coury, H., Gil, J. C., Kumar, S and E. Jones. 1999. Farm related injuries and fatalities in Alberta. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics 23(5-6):539-547. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-8141(98)00021-3
  4. Gerberich, S. G., Gibson, R. W., French, L. R., Lee, T., Carr, W. P., Kochevar, L., Renier, C. M. and J. Shutske. 1998. Machinery-Related Injuries: Regional Rural Injury Study-I (RRIS-I). Accident Analysis and Prevention 30(6):793-804. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0001-4575(98)00032-3
  5. Ingram, M. W. E. 2003. Machinery evaluation in a casecontrol study of farm machinery injuries in the prairie region of Canada. MS thesis. Saskatoon, Canada: University of Saskatchewan, Department of Agricultural and Bioresource Engineering.
  6. Kim, B., Shin, S., Kim, Y., Yum, S and J. Kim. 2013. Forecasting Demand of Agricultural Tractor, Riding Type Rice Transplanter and Combine Harvester by Using an ARIMA Model. Journal of Biosystems Engineering 38(1):9-17. https://doi.org/10.5307/JBE.2013.38.1.009
  7. Kim, B., Kim, Y., Yun, N., Yum, S and S. Shin. 2014. A Survey on the Farm Accidents of Agricultural Machinery in South Korea. In: Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Machinery and Mechatronics for Agriculture and Biosystems Engineering, Yilan, Taiwan: CIAMJSAM-KSAM.
  8. Layde, P. M., Nordstrom, D. L., Stueland, D., Branda, L and K. A. Olson. 1995. Machine-related occupational injuries in farm residents. Annals of Epidemiology 5(6): 419-426. https://doi.org/10.1016/1047-2797(95)00056-9
  9. Narasimhan, G. R., Peng, Y., Crowe, T. G., Hagel, L., Dosman, J and W. Pickett. 2010. Operational safety practices as determinants of machinery-related injury on Saskatchewan farms. Accident Analysis & Prevention 42(4):1226-1231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2010.01.016
  10. O'Brien, R. M. 2007. A caution regarding rules of thumb for variance inflation factors. Quality and Quantity 41(5):673. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-006-9018-6
  11. Sohn, J. R., Park, J. H., Kim, S. P., Kim, S. J., Cho, S. H and N. S. Cho. 2007. Analysis of risk factors influencing the severity of agricultural machinery-related injuries. Journal of the Korean Society of Emergency Medicine 18(4):300-306(In Korean, with English abstract).
  12. Song, M. S., Lee, Y. J., Cho, S. S and B. C. Kim. 1993. Analysis of statistical data. 2nd ed. Seoul, Republic of Korea: Freedom Academy Pub. Co.
  13. Valent, F., Schiava, F., Savonitto, C., Gallo, T., Brusaferro, S and F. Barbone. 2002. Risk factors for fatal road traffic accidents in Udine, Italy. Accident Analysis and Prevention 34(1):71-84. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0001-4575(00)00104-4

Cited by

  1. Moderating Effect of Structural Complexity on the Relationship between Surgery Volume and in Hospital Mortality of Cancer Patients vol.24, pp.4, 2014, https://doi.org/10.4332/KJHPA.2014.24.4.380
  2. Effects of Structural Complexity and Technical Proficiency on the Treatment Outcome of the Clinical Departments in General Hospitals vol.41, pp.2, 2016, https://doi.org/10.21032/jhis.2016.41.2.184
  3. Acquisition of Grass Harvesting Characteristics Information and Improvement of the Accuracy of Topographical Surveys for the GIS by Sensor Fusion (I) - Analysis of Grass Harvesting Characteristics by Sensor Fusion - vol.40, pp.1, 2015, https://doi.org/10.5307/JBE.2015.40.1.028