DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Applicability Analysis of Water Provisioning Services Quantification Models of Forest Ecosystem

산림생태계 수자원 공급서비스 계량화 모형의 국내적용성 분석

  • Choi, Hyun-Ah (Department of Environmental Science and Ecological Engineering, Korea University) ;
  • Lee, Woo-Kyun (Department of Environmental Science and Ecological Engineering, Korea University) ;
  • Song, Cholho (Department of Environmental Science and Ecological Engineering, Korea University) ;
  • Lee, Jong Yeol (Department of Environmental Science and Ecological Engineering, Korea University) ;
  • Jeon, Seong Woo (Korea Environment Institute) ;
  • Kim, Joon Sun (Department of Forest Management, Kangwon National University)
  • 최현아 (고려대학교 환경생태공학과) ;
  • 이우균 (고려대학교 환경생태공학과) ;
  • 송철호 (고려대학교 환경생태공학과) ;
  • 이종열 (고려대학교 환경생태공학과) ;
  • 전성우 (한국환경정책.평가연구원) ;
  • 김준순 (강원대학교 산림경영학과)
  • Received : 2014.02.25
  • Accepted : 2014.06.30
  • Published : 2014.08.30

Abstract

Forest ecosystems generate variety of important goods and services for human well-being. As a growing concern of climate change and water shortage, it is necessary to quantify, model and map water balance in forest. In this study, we have analyzed 11 overseas forest water supply models (AIM, ATEAM, CENTURY, (E)SWAT, GUMBO, InVEST, PLM, SAVANNA, WaSSI, WaterGAP, WBM) and compared their scale, input and out data, availability of the models and analyzed the applicability of the models to Korea. As a result, InVEST and WaterGAP model appeared to be applicable for quantifying water provisioning services in Korea. A systematic approach for applying to evaluate water balance in forest was suggested based on our quantification approach.

Keywords

References

  1. Ahn SE. 2013. Definition and Classification of Ecosystem Services for Decision Making. Journal of Environmental Policy, 12(2): 3-16. (in Korean)
  2. AIM Project Team. 1996. An Estimation of a Negotiable Safe Emissions Corridor based on the AIM Model - Preliminary Study -. AIM Interim Paper, IP-03.
  3. Alcamo, J. and Henrichs, T. 2002 Critical regions: a model-based estimation of world water resources sensitive to global changes. Aquatic Sci. 64: 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00027-002-8050-4
  4. Arnold, J. G. Srinivasan, R. Muttiah, R. S. and J. R. Williams. 1998. Large-area hydrologic modeling and assessment: Part I. Model development. J. American Water Resour. Assoc. 34(1): 73-89. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-1688.1998.tb05961.x
  5. ATEAM Project Team. 2004. Advanced Terrestrial Ecosystem Analysis and Modelling: Final Report, Section 5 and 6 and Annex 1 to 6. http://www.pik-potsdam.de/ateam/ateam_final_report_sections_5_to_6.pdf (Accessed: 2010.10.29.)
  6. Averyt, K..Fisher, J..Huber-Lee, A..Lewis, A..Macknick, J..Madden, N..Rogers, J. and Tellinghuisen, S. 2011. Freshwater use by U.S. power plants: Electricity's thirst for a precious resource, A report of the Energy and Water in a Warming World initiative. Cambridge, MA, Union of Concerned Scientists, Available at: http://www.ucsusa.org/clean_energy/our-energy-choices/energy-and-water-use/freshwater-use-by-us-power-plants.html.
  7. Boumans, R..Costanza, R..Farley, J..Wilson, M. A..Portela, R..Rotmans, J..Villa, F. and M. Grasso. 2002. Modeling the Dynamics of the Integrated Earth System and the Value of Global Ecosystem Services Using the GUMBO Model. Ecological Economics 41: 529-560. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(02)00098-8
  8. Combalicer, E. A..Lee SH.Ahn S.Kim DY and Im, S. 2008. Modeling Water Balance for the Small-Forested Watershed in Korea. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 12(5): 339-348. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-008-0339-y
  9. Costanza, R..D'Arge, R..de Groot, R. S..Farber, S..Grasso, M..Hannon, B..Limburg, K..Naeem, S..O'Neill, R. V..Paruelo, J..Raskin, R. G..Sutton, P. and van den Belt, M. 1997. The value of world's ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature, 387: 253-260. https://doi.org/10.1038/387253a0
  10. Coughenour, M. B. 1992. Spatial modelling and landscape characterization of an African pastoral ecosystem: a prototype model and its potential use for monitoring drought. In: D. H. McKenzie, D. E. Hyatt, and V. J. McDonald (EDS.). Ecological Indicators, Vol. 1. New York, NY: Elsevier Applied Science, 787-810.
  11. Daily, G. C. 1997. Nature's Services Societal Dependence On Natural Ecosystems. Island Press, Washington DC.
  12. de Groot, R. S..Wilson, M. A. and Boumans, R. M. 2002. A typology for the classification, description and valuation of ecosystem functions, goods and services, Ecological economics, 41(3): 393-408. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(02)00089-7
  13. Doll, P. 2002. Impact of climate change and variability on irrigation requirements: A global perspective. Climatic Change, 54(3): 269-293. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016124032231
  14. Egoh, B..Drakou, E..Dunbar, M. B..Maes, J. and Willeman, L. 2012. Indicators for mapping ecosystem services: a review. EUR 25456 EN.
  15. Han JY.Kim SH and Kim, NW. 2003 The Resolution of the Digital Terrain Index for the Prediction of Soil Moisture. Journal of Korea Water Resources Association, 36(2): 251-261. (in Korean) https://doi.org/10.3741/JKWRA.2003.36.2.251
  16. Heo SG.Kim KS.Sagong M.Ahn JH and Lim JJ. 2005. Evaluation of SWAT Applicability to Simulate Soil Erosion at Highland Agricultural Lands. Journal of Korean Society of Rural Planning, 11(4): 67-74. (in Korean)
  17. Hong SY.Minasny, B..Zhang YS..Kim YH and Jung KH. 2010. Digital soil mapping using legacy soil data in Korea. International Union of Soil Sciences (IUSS). c/o Institut fur Bodenforschung, Universitat fur Bodenkultur, pp. 5-8.
  18. IEEP, Alterra, Ecologic, PBL, and UNEP-WCMC. 2009. Scenarios and models for exploring future trends of biodiversity and ecosystem services changes. Final report to the European Commission, DG Environment on Contract ENV.G.1/ETU/2008/0090r. Institute for European Environmental Policy, Alterra Wageningen UR, Ecologic, Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency, United Nations Environment Programme World Conservation Monitoring Centre.
  19. Jang CH.Kim HJ and Kim NW. 2003. Estimate Yongdam-dem Basin of Long-range Runoff Using AVSWAT 2000. Proceeding of Korea Water Resources Association 2003, 46-49. (in Korean)
  20. Jang JS. 2003. Introduction of Hydrologic Models and Parameters. Journal of Korean National Committee on Irrigation and Drainage, 10(1): 95-102. (in Korean)
  21. Jung YH.Choi HT.Yoo JY and Kim, KH. 2009. A Study on Water Environment Change of Watershed in Forest Practice Area. Korea Forest Research Institute. (in Korean)
  22. Kim CG and Kim NW. 2004. Assessment of Forest Vegetation Effect on Water Balance in a Watershed. Journal of Korea Water Resources Association, 37(9): 737-744. (in Korean) https://doi.org/10.3741/JKWRA.2004.37.9.737
  23. Kim CY.Kim SH.Jeong SW and Kim W. 2004. Development of Soil Moisture Monitoring System for Effective Soil Moisture Measurement for Hillslope Using Flow Distribution Algorithm and TDR. Journal of Korea Water Resources Association, 37(1): 31-41. (in Korean) https://doi.org/10.3741/JKWRA.2004.37.1.031
  24. Kim GH.Jeong YH.Jeong CG.Jeon JH and Yu JY. 2003. The Impacts of Forest Type on Peak Flows in Long-term Hydrological Data at Three Small Forested Catchments. Journal of Korean Forestry Society, 92(5): 462-469. (in Korean)
  25. Kim HJ. 2001. Development of two-parametric hyperbolic model for daily streamflow simulation. Ph.D. thesis, Seoul National University, pp. 1-3. (in Korean)
  26. Kim JC.Jeong JH.Kim SH.Shim WB.Ryu JH.Kim JS.Seo SA and Yoo BO. 2009. The 4th Forest Resource Monitoring Survey in Korea. Korea Forest Research Institute. (in Korean)
  27. Kim JH.Kim JJ.Jun JH.Son YM.Kim KH. Yoon HJ.Park CY and Lee SW. 2007. A Study on the Estimation and the Evaluation Methods of Public Function of Forest. Korea Forest Research Institute. (in Korean)
  28. Kim JH.Kim KD.Kim RH.Park CR.Youn HJ.Lee SW.Choi HT and Kim JJ. 2010. A Study on the Estimation and the Evaluation Methods of Public Function of Forest. Korea Forest Research Institute. (in Korean)
  29. Kim, K. H..Kim, S. H..Kim, H. S. and W. Kim. 2005. Establishment and Operation of a Soil Moisture Monitoring System Considering Temporal and Spatial Features of Representation. Journal of Korea Water Resources Association, 38(1): 73-82. https://doi.org/10.3741/JKWRA.2005.38.1.073
  30. Kim KH.Jeong YH.Jeong CG.Jun JH and Yoo JY. 2004. Effects of Thinning and Pruning on Canopy Storage Capacity, Net Rainfall and Interception Loss in Pinus koraiensis and Abies holophylla Plots. Journal of Korean Forestry Society, 93(7): 453-463. (in Korean)
  31. Kim NW.Jung IM and Woon YS. 2006. An Integrated Surface Water-Groundwater Modeling by Using Fully Combined SWAT-MODFLOW Model. Journal of the Korean Society of Civil Engineers, 26(5B): 481-488. (in Korean)
  32. Kim S. 1997. Development of a monthly Runoff Model, Korea Institute of Civil Engineering and Building Technology. (in Korean)
  33. Kim SA.Lee WK.Son Y.Cho Y and Lee MS. 2009. Applicability of Climate Change Impact Assessment Models to Korean Forest. Journal of Korean Forestry Society, 98(1): 33-48. (in Korean)
  34. Koo MH.Lee DK and Jung TY. 2013. A Study on the Contexts of Ecosystem Services in the Policymaking Process. Journal of the Korea Society of Environmental Restoration Technology, 15(5): 85-102. (in Korean) https://doi.org/10.13087/kosert.2012.15.5.085
  35. Lee AR.Yi K.Son Y.Kim RH.Kim CS.Park GS.Lee KH and Yi MJ. 2010. Approaches for Developing a Korean Model Through Analysis of Overseas Forest Soil Carbon Models. Journal of Korean Forestry Society, 99(6): 791-801. (in Korean)
  36. Lee H.Chae YR.Kim YG.Cho GW.Lee Y.Kim YJ and Bae HJ. 2011. Economic Analysis of Climate Change in Korea. Ministry of Environment. (in Korean)
  37. Lee MK. 2007. Opportunity Cost for Increasing Watershed Conservation Function of Forest - A Case Study of Sueo Dam Catchment Area in Mt. Baekun Jeollanamdo -. MA thesis, Seoul National University. (in Korean)
  38. Lockaby, G..Nagy, C..Vose, J. M..Ford, C. R..Sun, G..McNulty, S..Caldwell, P..Cohen, E. and Moore Myers, J. A.: Water and Forests, in Wear D. N., and Greis J. G. 2011. The Southern Forest Futures Project: Technical Report, USDA Forest Service, Southern Research Station, Asheville, NC., General Technical Report. Available at: http://www.srs.fs.usda.gov/futures/
  39. MA (Millennium Ecosystem Assessment). 2005. Ecosystems and Human Well-being. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. Island Press. Washington DC.
  40. Metzger, M. J., Leemans, R., Schroter, D., Cramer, W. and ATEAM Consortium. 2004. The ATEAM vulnerability mapping tool. Quantitative Approaches in Systems Analysis No. 27. Office C.T. de Wit Graduate School for Production Ecology & Resource Conservation (PE&RC), Wageningen, The Netherlands, CD-ROM Publication.
  41. Neitsch, S. L..Arnold, J. G..Kiniry, J. R..Srinivasan, R. and J. R. Williams. 2004. Soil and Water Assessment Tool Input / Output File Documentation. Ver. 2005. Temple, Tex.: USDA-ARS Grassland Soil and Water Research Laboratory.
  42. Ojima, D. S..Parton, W. J..Schimel, D. S..Scurlock, J. M. and Kittel, T. G. 1993. Modelling the effects of climatic and CO2 changes on grassland storage of soil-c Terrestrial Biospheric Carbon Fluxes. Springer Netherlands, 643-657.
  43. Park JC. 2009. A Study on the Application of the National GIS and Environmental Observation Data for Assessment of Regional Water Balance: A Case of the Catchment of Guryang Stream. Journal of the Korean Geographical Society, 44(4): 557-576. (in Korean)
  44. Park JY.Lee MS.Lee YJ and Kim SJ. 2008. The Analysis of Future Land Use Change Impact on Hydrology and Water Quality Using SWAT Model. Journal of the Korean Society of Civil Engineers, 28(2B): 187-197. (in Korean)
  45. Park SW. 1995. Applied Hydrology. Hyangmoon Publishing Co. (in Korean)
  46. Parton, W. J..Schimel, D. S..Cole, C. V. and Ojima, D. S. 1987. Analysis of factors controlling soil organic levels of grasslands in the Great Plains. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 51: 1173-1179. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1987.03615995005100050015x
  47. Smart, S. M..Pearce-Higgins, J. P..Wright, L. J..Comber, A. J..Howard, D. C..Maskell, L. C. and Jones, M. L. M. 2012. Exploring the Future: Phase 1 - scoping current and future use of spatial Decision Support Tools (sDST) for integrated planning for land-use, biodiversity and ecosystem services across England. Defra, London.
  48. Sun, G..McNulty, S. G..Moore Myers, J. A. and Cohen, E. C. 2008. Impacts of Multiple Stresses on Water Demand and Supply across the Southeastern United States. Journal of American Water Resources Association, 44(6): 1441-1457. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-1688.2008.00250.x
  49. TEEB. 2010. The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity: Ecological and Economic Foundations, Editor: Kumar P. Earthscan, London and Washington.
  50. Tucker, G. and Braat, L. C. 2009. Scenarios and models for exploring future trends of biodiversity and ecosystem services changes, Institute for European Environmental Policy (IEEP).
  51. UK NEA (National Ecosystem Assessment). 2011, The UK National Ecosystem Assessment Technical Report, UNEP-WCMC, Cambridge.
  52. Vandewalle, M..Sykes, M. T..Harrison, P. A..Luck, G. W..Berry, P..Bugter, R..Dawson, T. P..Feld, C. K..Harrington, R..Haslett, J. R..Hering, D..Jones, K. B..Jongman, R..Lavorel, S..Martins da Silva, P..Moora, M..Paterson, J..Rounsevell, M. D. A..Sandin, L..Settele, J..Sousa, J. P. and Zobel, M. 2009. Review paper on concepts of dynamic ecosystems and their services. The RUBICODE Project Funded under the European Commission Sixth Framework Programme (Contract Number: 036890).
  53. Villa, F..Voinov, A..Fitz, C. and Costanza, R. 2004. Calibration of Large Spatial Models: A multistage, multiobjective optimization technique. Landscape Simulation Modeling Dynamic Systems, Springer New York, 77-116.
  54. Vorosmarty, C. J., andFederer, C. A. and Schloss, A. 1989. Potential evaporation functions compared on U.S. watersheds: Implications for global-scale water balance and terrestrial ecosystem modeling. Journal of Hydrology, 207: 147-69.
  55. Woo BM.Kim JS.Lee HH and Choi HT. 1998. The purpose of this study was to develop the Rainfall-Runoff Model for a long and short term runoff analysis in small forested mountain watersheds. Journal of Korean Forestry Society, 87(1): 11-19. (in Korean)