콘크리트학회논문집 (Journal of the Korea Concrete Institute)

  • 제26권4호
  • /
  • Pages.545-553
  • /
  • 2014
  • /
  • 1229-5515(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2234-2842(eISSN)
한국콘크리트학회 (Korea Concrete Institute)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

변형기여분에 따른 프리캐스트 보-기둥 접합부의 분류방안

Classification Schemes of Precast Beam-Column Connections According to Contribution of Deformation Components

  • 최현기 (경남대학교 소방방재공학과) ;
  • 최창식 (한양대학교 건축공학과)
  • Choi, Hyun-Ki (Dept. of Fire and Disaster Prevention Engineering, Kyungnam University) ;
  • Choi, Chang-Sik (Dept. of Architectural Engineering, Hanyang University)
  • 투고 : 2014.04.24
  • 심사 : 2014.06.20
  • 발행 : 2014.08.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

이 연구는 PC 보-기둥 접합부의 일반적인 거동의 접합 상세에 따른 통합적 평가 방안을 제안하였다. 이 연구는 접합부의 파괴 패턴과 이에 연관된 접합부 상세의 특징을 정량적으로 표현하기 위해 접합부와 각 요소들이 보유한 변형기여분을 사용할 것을 제안하였다. 이에 따라 PC 접합부는 '일체식 접합부'와 '연결식 접합부'로 크게 분류되었다. 접합부의 분류를 위한 기준 사항의 제안 및 검증을 위해 네 개의 보-기둥 실험체의 실험을 수행하였다. 실험은 일반적인 보-기둥 접합부의 실험 방법과 같은 방법으로 진행되었다. 가력은 접합부 상부 기둥의 끝단에서 수행되었으며, 보 양단은 힌지로 고정되었다. 변형기여분의 평가를 위해 총 34개의 LVDT가 주요 변형이 발생할 것으로 예상되는 곳에 설치되었다. 실험 결과 세 개의 실험체에서 나타난 각 요소들의 변형기여분은 수치적으로 다른 특성을 가지고 있는 것을 확인할 수 있었다. 실험 결과를 기반으로 접합부의 변형 정도와 다른 요소들의 변형 정도에 의거하여, 접합부의 변형이 적고 보의 휨 변형이 크게 나타나는 강한 접합부와 접합부의 변형이 용인되는 연성 접합부로 일체식 접합부를 분류할 수 있었다.

This study suggested an integrated classification method for generalized characteristics of PC beam-column connection according to connection details. Quantifying the failure mode of PC-beam column connection and characteristics of corresponding details, this study suggested to use deformation contribution of each element of beam-column assemblage. According to the expected failure mode of beam-column connection assemblage, PC beam-column connection can be classified into 'equivalent monolithic system' and 'jointed system'. In this study, four test specimens were tested for verification of detailed classification method of PC beam-column connections. Test was carried out with typical beam-column connection test method. Load was applied at the top of test specimen and end of beams were restrained by hinge. In order to verify the deformation contribution of each test specimen, 34-LVDTs were mounted on test specimen. According to test results, deformation contribution of each test specimen have different characteristics. Deformation characteristics of joint and other components which are quantified by test results, equivalent monolithic system can be classified into two categories. Strong connection have extremely small deformation contribution of joint and much larger deformation contribution was shown in flexural behavior of beam. The other type of beam-column connection is ductile connection which allows the larger deformation in joint area compared with strong connection.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Choi, H. K., Choi, Y. C., and Choi, C. S., "Development and Testing of Precast Concrete Beam-to-Column Connections," Journal of Engineering Structures, Vol. 53, No. 11, 2013, pp. 1820-1835. (doi: http://dx.doi.org /10.1016/j.engstruct.2013.07.021)
  2. Seo, S. Y., Lee, L. H., Jin, S. O., and Choi, Y. C., "Evaluation on the Deformation Capacity of RC Frame Structure with Strong Column-Weak Beam," Journal of KSMI, Vol. 7, No. 26, 2003, pp. 225-233.
  3. Paulay, T. and Priestley, M. J. N., "Seismic Design of Reinforced Concrete and Masonry Buildings," A Wiley Interscience Publication, 1992, pp. 250-269.
  4. Federal Emergency Management Agency, NEHRP Recommended Provisions for Seismic Regulations for New Buildings and Other Structures, 1994 Edition, FEMA Publication No. 222; and Commentary, FEMA Publication No. 223, 1995, pp. 183-195.
  5. Federal Emergency Management Agency, NEHRP Recommended Provisions for Seismic Regulations for New Buildings and Other Structures, 1997 Edition, FEMA Publication No. 302 and Commentary, FEMA Publication No. 303, 1998, pp. 179-197.
  6. ACI Committee 374, "Guide for Testing Reinforced Concrete Structural Elements under Slowly Applied Simulated Seismic Loads (ACI 374.2R-13), American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, Mich, 2013, pp.1-18.
  7. NZS 3101, "The Design of Concrete Structures," Part 1 and Part 2, New Zealand Standard, 2006, pp. 18.1-18.9.
  8. Fib Task Group 7.3, "Seismic Design of Precast Concrete Building Structures," Fib Bulletin 27, 2003, pp. 64-128.
  9. Nakaki, S. D., Stanton, J. F., and Sritharan, S., "An Overview of the PRESSS Five-Story Precast Test Building," Journal of PCI, Vol. 44, No. 2, 1999, pp. 26-39.
  10. Priestley, M. J. N., "Overview of PRESSS Research Program," PCI Journal, Vol. 36, No. 4, 1991, pp. 50-57. https://doi.org/10.15554/pcij.07011991.50.57
  11. ACI-ASCE Committee 352, "Recommendations for Design of Beam-Column Connections in Monolithic Reinforced Concrete Structures (ACI 352R-02)," American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, Mich., 2002, pp. 1-37.
  12. Englekirk, R. E., "Development and Testing of a Ductile Connector for Assembling Precast Concrete Beams and Columns," Journal of PCI, March-April 1995, pp. 36-51.
  13. Cheok, G. and Lew, H. S., "Performance of 1/3-Scale Model Precast Concrete Beam-Column Connections Subjected to Cyclic Inelastic Loads-Report No. 2," NISTIR 4589, NIST, June 1991, pp. 1-40.
  14. Cheok, G. and Stone, W., "Performance of 1/3-Scale Model Precast Concrete Beam-Column Connections Subjected to Cyclic Inelastic Loads-Report No. 3," NISTIR 5246, NIST, August 1993, pp. 1-43.
  15. Kim, S. H., Moon, J. H., and Lee, L. H., "An Experimental Study of the Structural Behavior on the Precast Concrete Beam-Column Interior Joint with Splice Type Reinforcin Bars," Journal of AIK, Vol. 20, No. 10, 2004, pp. 53-61.
  16. ACI 318M-11. Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete Andcommentary, Michigan(USA): American Concrete Institute(ACI), Committe 318, Vol. 318, 2011, pp. 299-334.