한국응급구조학회지 (The Korean Journal of Emergency Medical Services)

  • 제18권2호
  • /
  • Pages.7-20
  • /
  • 2014
  • /
  • 1738-1606(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2384-2091(eISSN)
한국응급구조학회 (The Korea Society of Emergency Medical Services)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

응급구조학과 학생 대상 한국판 시뮬레이션 경험 만족도 도구의 타당도 검증

Validation of a Korean version of the satisfaction with simulation experience scale for paramedic students

  • 권혜지 (을지대학교 응급구조학과) ;
  • 유순규 (을지대학교 응급구조학과)
  • Kwon, Hye-Ji (Department of Emergency Medical Service, Eulji University) ;
  • Yoou, Soon-Kyu (Department of Emergency Medical Service, Eulji University)
  • 투고 : 2014.02.19
  • 심사 : 2014.08.18
  • 발행 : 2014.08.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Purpose: This study aims to assess the reliability and validity of a Korean version of the satisfaction with simulation experience (SSE) scale for low-, medium-, and high-fidelity simulations among paramedic students. Methods: Exploratory factor analysis with varimax rotation was used to determine construct validity. Cronbach's alpha was calculated to assess internal consistency reliability. Results: Cronbach's alpha for the overall scale was .841. Exploratory factor analysis yielded a three-factor structure composed of clinical learning, clinical reasoning and debriefing and reflection. Each of the subscales had high internal consistency, with Cronbach's alphas of .852, .790 and .913, respectively. With respect to year, freshmen scored the highest on the SSE scale. With respect to type of simulation, the medium-fidelity group reported the highest satisfaction. Generally, the students were satisfied with debriefing and reflection. Conclusion: The Korean version of the SSE scale was shown to be a reliable and valid instrument for assessing satisfaction with simulation learning in paramedic students.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Kwon HR. Study on reality of field practice and improvements by students of Dep. of emergency medical technology. Korean J Emerg Med Ser 2002;6(6):15-26.
  2. Koh BY, Kwak MC, Sin HN. A study on the performance activities in emergency medical technology students field training. Korean J Emerg Med Ser 1999;3(3):55-64.
  3. Baek ML. A phenomenological study of paramedic student's experience on simulation. Korean J Emerg Med Ser 2012;16(3):63-75.
  4. Park JH, Jung E, Ko JK, Yoo HB. Delivery training for undergraduate medical students using birth simulator. Korean J Obstet Gynecol 2008;51(9):950-6.
  5. Miller GE. The assessment of clinical skills/competence/performance. Acad Med 1990;65(9):63-7. https://doi.org/10.1097/00001888-199002000-00001
  6. Park HK, Lee JK, Hwang HS, Lee JU, Choi YY, KIM H, et al. The agreement of checklist recordings between faculties and standardized patients in an objective structured clinical examination(OSCE). Korean J Med Educ 2003;15(2):143-50.
  7. Vu NV, Barrows HS, Marcy ML, Verhulst SJ, Colliver JA, Travis T. Six years of comprehensive, clinical, performance-based assessment using standardized patients at the Southern Illiois University School of Medicine. Acad Med 1992;67(1):42-50. https://doi.org/10.1097/00001888-199201000-00009
  8. Gardner R, Raemer DB. Simulation in obstetrics and gynecology. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 2008;35(1):97-127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ogc.2007.12.008
  9. Korean Emergency Medical Technician Association. Ministry of Health and Welfare submission report. 2013.
  10. Prion S. A practical framework for evaluating the impact of clinical simulation experiences in prelicensure nursing education( Electronic version). Clinical Simulation in Nursing 2008;4(3):e69-e78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2008.08.002
  11. Bruce SA, Scherer YK, Curran CC, Urschel DM, Erdley S, Ball LS. A collaborative exercise between graduate and undergraduate nursing a computer assisted simulator in a mock cardiac arrest. Nurs Educ Perspect 2009;30(1):22-7.
  12. Levett Jones T, McCoy M, Lapkin S, Noble D, Hoffman K, Dempsey J, et. al. The development and psychometric testing of the satisfaction experience scale. Nurs Educ Today 2011;31(7):705-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2011.01.004
  13. Roh YS. Validation of Korean version of the satisfaction with simulation experience scale. The Journal of the Korean Society for Simulation in Healthcare 2012;1(1):6-11.
  14. Lee HS. SPSS 20.0 manual. 1st ed. Seoul:Jyphyunjae, 2013. 377-407.
  15. Lee YH. Factor analysis. 1st ed. Seoul:Suckjung, 2002;117-33.
  16. Jeffries PR. Simulation in Nursing education. New York: National League for Nursing,2007.
  17. Pi HY. Effects and adequacy of simulationbased training in department of emergency medical technician ACLS lecture. Journal of Healthcare Simulation 2013;2(1):20-8.
  18. Issenberg SB, Mcgaghie WC, Petrusa ER, Lee Gordon D, Scalese RJ. Features and uses of high-fidelity medical simulations that lead to effective learning: a BEME systematic review. Med Teach 2005;27(1):10-28. https://doi.org/10.1080/01421590500046924

피인용 문헌

  1. Effects of a Simulation-based Stroke Care Education on Nursing Performance Ability and Satisfaction in Nursing Students vol.16, pp.1, 2015, https://doi.org/10.5762/KAIS.2015.16.1.408