The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics

The Korean Academy of Prosthodonitics (대한치과보철학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

In vitro evaluation of the fracture resistance and microleakage of porcelain laminate veneers bonded to teeth with composite fillings after cyclic loading

  • Sadighpour, Leyla (Dental Research Center, Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Tehran University of Medical Sciences) ;
  • Geramipanah, Farideh (Dental Implant Research Center, Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Tehran University of Medical Sciences) ;
  • Allahyari, Somayeh (Dental Research Center, Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Tehran University of Medical Sciences) ;
  • Sichani, Babak Fallahi (Research Institute for Nuclear Medicine, Shariati Hospital, Tehran university of Medical Sciences) ;
  • Fard, Mohamd Javad Kharazi (Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences)
  • Received : 2013.12.05
  • Accepted : 2014.06.05
  • Published : 2014.08.29
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

PURPOSE. There is insufficient data regarding the durability of porcelain laminate veneers bonded to existing composite fillings. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the fracture resistance and microleakage of porcelain laminate veneers bonded to teeth with existing composite fillings. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Thirty maxillary central incisors were divided into three groups (for each group, n=10): intact teeth (NP), teeth with class III composite fillings (C3) and teeth with class IV cavities (C4). Porcelain laminate veneers were made using IPS-Empress ceramic and bonded with Panavia F2 resin cement. The microleakage of all of the specimens was tested before and after cyclic loading ($1{\times}10^6$ cycles, 1.2 Hz). The fracture resistance values (N) were measured using a universal testing machine, and the mode of failure was also examined. The statistical analyses were performed using one-way ANOVA and Tukey post hoc tests (${\alpha}=.05$). RESULTS. There was a significant difference in the mean microleakage of group C4 compared with group NT (P=.013). There was no significant difference in the fracture loads among the groups. CONCLUSION. The microleakage and failure loads of porcelain laminate veneers bonded to intact teeth and teeth with standard class III composite fillings were not significantly different.

Keywords

References

  1. Calamia JR, Calamia CS. Porcelain laminate veneers: reasons for 25 years of success. Dent Clin North Am 2007;51:399-417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cden.2007.03.008
  2. Peumans M, Van Meerbeek B, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. Porcelain veneers: a review of the literature. J Dent 2000;28: 163-77. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-5712(99)00066-4
  3. Peumans M, De Munck J, Fieuws S, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G, Van Meerbeek B. A prospective ten-year clinical trial of porcelain veneers. J Adhes Dent 2004;6:65-76.
  4. Beier US, Kapferer I, Burtscher D, Dumfahrt H. Clinical performance of porcelain laminate veneers for up to 20 years. Int J Prosthodont 2012;25:79-85.
  5. Burke FJ. Survival rates for porcelain laminate veneers with special reference to the effect of preparation in dentin: a literature review. J Esthet Restor Dent 2012;24:257-65. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8240.2012.00517.x
  6. Gresnigt MM, Ozcan M, Kalk W, Galhano G. Effect of static and cyclic loading on ceramic laminate veneers adhered to teeth with and without aged composite restorations. J Adhes Dent 2011;13:569-77.
  7. Guess PC, Stappert CF. Midterm results of a 5-year prospective clinical investigation of extended ceramic veneers. Dent Mater 2008;24:804-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2007.09.009
  8. Chun YH, Raffelt C, Pfeiffer H, Bizhang M, Saul G, Blunck U, Roulet JF. Restoring strength of incisors with veneers and full ceramic crowns. J Adhes Dent 2010;12:45-54.
  9. Dennison JB, Sarrett DC. Prediction and diagnosis of clinical outcomes affecting restoration margins. J Oral Rehabil 2012; 39:301-18. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.2011.02267.x
  10. Magne P, Kwon KR, Belser UC, Hodges JS, Douglas WH. Crack propensity of porcelain laminate veneers: A simulated operatory evaluation. J Prosthet Dent 1999;81:327-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(99)70277-5
  11. Kuper NK, Opdam NJ, Bronkhorst EM, Ruben JL, Huysmans MC. Hydrodynamic flow through loading and in vitro secondary caries development. J Dent Res 2013;92:383-7. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034513481040
  12. Gresnigt MM, Kalk W, Ozcan M. Clinical longevity of ceramic laminate veneers bonded to teeth with and without existing composite restorations up to 40 months. Clin Oral Investig 2013;17:823-32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-012-0790-5
  13. Summitt JB. Fundamentals of operative dentistry: A contemporary approach. 3rd ed., Chicago; Quintessence Pub.; 2006. p. 472.
  14. Behr M, Rosentritt M, Latzel D, Kreisler T. Comparison of three types of fiber-reinforced composite molar crowns on their fracture resistance and marginal adaptation. J Dent 2001;29:187-96. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-5712(01)00007-0
  15. Stappert CF, Ozden U, Gerds T, Strub JR. Longevity and failure load of ceramic veneers with different preparation designs after exposure to masticatory simulation. J Prosthet Dent 2005;94:132-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2005.05.023
  16. Ozturk E, Bolay S, Hickel R, Ilie N. Shear bond strength of porcelain laminate veneers to enamel, dentine and enameldentine complex bonded with different adhesive luting systems. J Dent 2013;41:97-105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2012.04.005
  17. Bayne SC. Dental restorations for oral rehabilitation - testing of laboratory properties versus clinical performance for clinical decision making. J Oral Rehabil 2007;34:921-32. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.2007.01812.x
  18. Rueggeberg FA. Substrate for adhesion testing to tooth structure - review of the literature. Dent Mater 1991;7:2-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/0109-5641(91)90017-S
  19. Ozcan M, Mese A. Fracture strength of indirect resin composite laminates to teeth with existing restorations: an evaluation of conditioning protocols. J Adhes Dent 2009;11:391-7.
  20. Turkaslan S, Tezvergil-Mutluay A, Bagis B, Shinya A, Vallittu PK, Lassila LV. Effect of intermediate fiber layer on the fracture load and failure mode of maxillary incisors restored with laminate veneers. Dent Mater J 2008;27:61-8. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.27.61
  21. Sarac YS, Basoglu T, Ceylan GK, Sarac D, Yapici O. Effect of denture base surface pretreatment on microleakage of a silicone-based resilient liner. J Prosthet Dent 2004;92:283-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2004.06.004
  22. Sarac D, Sarac YS, Basoglu T, Yapici O, Yuzbasioglu E. The evaluation of microleakage and bond strength of a siliconebased resilient liner following denture base surface pretreatment. J Prosthet Dent 2006;95:143-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2005.11.012
  23. Geramipanah F, Rezaei SM, Sichani SF, Sichani BF, Sadighpour L. Microleakage of different post systems and a custom adapted fiber post. J Dent (Tehran) 2013;10:94-102.
  24. Magne P, Douglas WH. Cumulative effects of successive restorative procedures on anterior crown flexure: intact versus veneered incisors. Quintessence Int 2000;31:5-18.
  25. Fradeani M, Redemagni M, Corrado M. Porcelain laminate veneers: 6- to 12-year clinical evaluation-a retrospective study. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2005;25:9-17.
  26. Friedman MJ. Porcelain veneer restorations: a clinician's opinion about a disturbing trend. J Esthet Restor Dent 2001;13: 318-27. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8240.2001.tb01014.x
  27. Kasaz AC, Pena CE, de Alexandre RS, Viotti RG, Santana VB, Arrais CA, Giannini M, Reis AF. Effects of a peripheral enamel margin on the long-term bond strength and nanoleakage of composite/dentin interfaces produced by self-adhesive and conventional resin cements. J Adhes Dent 2012;14: 251-63.

Cited by

  1. Fracture Resistance of Ceramic Laminate Veneers Bonded to Teeth with Class V Composite Fillings after Cyclic Loading vol.2018, pp.1687-8736, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/1456745
  2. Fracture Resistance of Composite Veneers with Different Preparation Designs vol.20, pp.2, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1515/bjdm-2016-0016
  3. 라미네이트 치아형성 디자인에 관한 문헌고찰 vol.32, pp.3, 2014, https://doi.org/10.14368/jdras.2016.32.3.149
  4. Evaluation of fracture resistance of Cerasmart and lithium disilicate ceramic veneers with different incisal preparation designs: an in vitro study vol.8, pp.None, 2019, https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.20103.1
  5. Influence of Ceramic and Substrate Types on the Microleakage of Aged Porcelain Laminate Veneers vol.13, pp.None, 2014, https://doi.org/10.2147/ccide.s280280
  6. Evaluation of the Sealing Ability of Direct versus Direct-Indirect Veneer Techniques: An In Vitro Study vol.2021, pp.None, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/1118728