대한소아치과학회지 (Journal of the korean academy of Pediatric Dentistry)

  • 제41권3호
  • /
  • Pages.207-217
  • /
  • 2014
  • /
  • 1226-8496(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2288-3819(eISSN)
대한소아치과학회 (Korean Academy of Pediatric Dentistry)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

익산시 청소년의 부정교합과 치아우식 유병률 사이의 연관성

Relationship between the Malocclusion and Caries Prevalence of Adolescents in Iksan

  • 신가영 (원광대학교 치과대학 소아치과학교실) ;
  • 라지영 (원광대학교 치과대학 소아치과학교실) ;
  • 안소연 (원광대학교 치과대학 소아치과학교실) ;
  • 송지현 (원광대학교 치과대학 소아치과학교실) ;
  • 이광희 (원광대학교 치과대학 소아치과학교실)
  • Shin, Gayoung (Department of Pediatric Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Wonkwang University) ;
  • Ra, Jiyoung (Department of Pediatric Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Wonkwang University) ;
  • An, Soyoun (Department of Pediatric Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Wonkwang University) ;
  • Song, Jihyun (Department of Pediatric Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Wonkwang University) ;
  • Lee, Kwanghee (Department of Pediatric Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Wonkwang University)
  • 투고 : 2014.04.18
  • 심사 : 2014.07.11
  • 발행 : 2014.08.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본 연구는 제2대구치까지 구강 내에 맹출하여 비교적 안정된 교합을 이루기 시작한 영구치열기 청소년의 부정교합과 치아우식 유병률 사이의 연관성을 알아보고자 하였다. 전라북도 익산시 소재의 2개 중학교 학생 385명을 대상으로 시행한 구강검진을 통해 치아심미지수와 우식경험영구치지수를 조사하였다. 조사 대상 청소년의 치아심미지수는 평균 12.42점, 우식경험영구치지수는 평균 2.89개로 나타났다. 교정치료가 매우 필요하다고 판단되는 치아심미지수 36점 이상은 4명(1.03%)이었으며, 남학생이 여학생에 비해 상악 중절치의 정중이개와 하악 전치부 수평피개를 나타내는 비율이 유의하게 높았다(p < 0.05). 치아심미지수를 구성하는 10개 항목 중 7개 항목(결손치아 수, 전치부 악궁 총생도, 상악 전치부 최대 변위량, 하악 전치부 최대 변위량, 하악 전치부 수평피개량, 전치부 개방교합, 제1대구치의 전후방 관계)에서 각 항목의 정상 범주에 속하는 집단에 비해 정상 범주에서 벗어난 집단의 우식경험영구치 지수가 유의하게 높았다(p < 0.05). 명백한 부정교합의 존재가 인정되는 치아심미지수 26점을 기준으로, 26점 미만에 비해 26점 이상인 집단의 우식경험영구치지수가 높았으며(p < 0.01), 치아심미지수와 우식경험영구치지수 사이에 유의한 선형 상관관계가 나타났다(r = 0.584, p < 0.01). 이상의 결과로부터 청소년의 부정교합과 치아우식증 유병률 사이에 유의한 양의 상관관계가 존재함을 알 수 있었으며, 치아우식증과 높은 상관성을 보이는 특정 형태의 부정교합을 확인할 수 있었다.

The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the relationship between the malocclusion and dental caries in adolescents with permanent dentition. The subjects of the study were 385 adolescents aged 12 to 15 years. Dental Aesthetic Index (DAI) and DMFT index were recorded as clinical indicators of malocclusion and dental caries. The mean Dental Aesthetic Index (DAI) score of the subjects was 12.42 and the mean DMFT index of the subjects was 2.89. Four students (1.04%) were included in the group of orthodontic treatment mandatory, which signifies the handicapping malocclusion. Moreover, the result of gender-specific analysis of the DAI components observed that the prevalence of midline diastema and mandibular overjet were significantly higher among boys (p < 0.05). In 7 components (missing teeth, incisal segment crowding, maxillary anterior irregularity, mandibular anterior irregularity, mandibular overjet, anterior openbite, antero-posterior molar relationship) among the 10 DAI components, abnormal groups showed significantly higher DMFT index than normal groups (p < 0.05). The subjects in the group of definite to handicapping malocclusion (DAI ${\geq}$ 26) showed significantly higher DMFT index than the subjects in the group of minor or no malocclusion (p < 0.01). In addition, the DAI score had significant positive linear correlation with the DMFT index (r = 0.584, p < 0.01). Consequently, the current findings suggested a positive relationship between the malocclusion and caries prevalence. And several specific types of malocclusion were supposed to be significantly correlated with dental caries.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Vallejos-Sanchez AA, Medina-Solis CE, Perez- Olivares S, et al. : Caries increment in the permanent dentition of Mexican children in relation to prior caries experience on permanent and primary dentitions. J Dent, 34:709-715, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2006.01.003
  2. 2012 Annual report of health examination among elementary, middle, and high school students in Korea. Available from URL: https://schoolhealth.kedi.re.kr/Home/Home/SHDataFileDownload.php?GbnCd=SHData&lstnum1=1652&file_seq=1 (assesed on Febuary 17, 2014)
  3. Korean National Oral Health Survey. Available from URL: http://www.prism.go.kr/homepage/researchCommon/downloadResearchAttachFile.do?work_key=001&file_type=CPR&seq_no=001&pdf_conv_yn=N&research_id=1351000-201200095 (assessed on Febuary 25, 2014)
  4. Construction of the oral health service system for whole life. Available from URL: http://koix.kisti.re. kr/root_resolution.jsp?koi=KISTI2.1015/RPT.TRKO201000000624 (assessed on Febuary 25, 2014)
  5. Kim MK, Han DH, Bae KH : The association between socio-economic status and deciduous dental caries among 3-6 year old children in Pusan. J Korean Acad Dent Health, 30:447-452, 2006.
  6. Kwon BM, Bae IH, Kim S, et al. : Dental caries status of 14-16 year old adolescents in Yangsan area. J Korean Acad Pediatr Dent, 41:8-16, 2014. https://doi.org/10.5933/JKAPD.2014.41.1.8
  7. Lee SK : The ratio of tooth surfaces attacked by caries at 12 to 13-year-old students in several cities of Chollabukdo, Korea. J Korean Acad Dent Health, 26:295-302, 2002.
  8. Kim SS, Jang JH : Dental health types in middle school students and their Effects on dental caries: focusing on O middle school students in Suwon. J Korean Soc School Health, 13:283-293, 2000.
  9. Jang JH : The Relationship of Psychosocial Factors, Dietary Habits and DMFT Index in Adolescents. Korean J Health Educ Promot, 26:23-33, 2009.
  10. Jang JH, Kim SH : The relationship of health risk behavior, depression and dental caries experience in 12-year-old adolescents. J Korean Acad Dent Health, 31:593-601, 2007.
  11. Jenny J, Cons NC : DAI: The Dental Aesthetic Index, 1st ed., College of Dentistry, University of Iowa, 76-83, 1986.
  12. Jenny J, Cons NC, Kohout FJ, Jakobsen J : Predicting handicapping malocclusion using the Dental Aesthetic Index (DAI). Int Dent J, 43:128-132, 1993.
  13. Oral health surveys; basic methods, 4th ed. Available from URL: http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/41905/1/9241544937.pdf (assessed on Febuary 25, 2014)
  14. Korean Acad Pediatr Dent : Dentistry for the child and adolesent, 4th ed., Shin-hung international, Seoul, 142-146, 2007.
  15. Jung HK, Kuk SH, Kim JK, Kim DK : The improvement of Dental Aesthetic Index (DAI) on orthodontic patient in Korea. J Korean Acad Dent Health, 21:363-378, 1997.
  16. Angle EH : Classification of malocclusion. Dent Cosmos, 41:248-264, 1988.
  17. Sohn BW, Hwang CJ, Hwang HS : Modality of malocclusion according to regional difference using HLD, TPI, and HMAR. Korean J Orthod, 23:17-35, 1993.
  18. Draker HL : Handicapping labio-lingual deviation : A proposed index for public health purpose. Am J Orthod, 46:295-305, 1960. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(60)90197-4
  19. Grainger RM : The orthodontic treatment priority index. Available from URL: http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/series/sr_02/sr02_025acc.pdf (assessed on March 5, 2014)
  20. Salzmann JA : Handicapping Malocclusion Assessment to establish treatment priority. Am J Orthod, 54:749-765, 1968. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(68)90065-1
  21. Brook PH, Shaw WC : The development of an index of orthodontic treatment priority. Eur J Orthod, 16:395-399, 1989.
  22. Jenny J, Cons NC : Comparing and contrasting two orthodontic indices, the Index of Orthodontic Treatment Need and the Dental Aesthetic Index. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 110:410-416, 1996. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-5406(96)70044-6
  23. Cho CH, Kang DO, Choi SL, Chang KW : Dental Aesthetic Index (DAI) of 12-year-old Korean adolescent. J Korean Acad Dent Health, 18:103-118, 1994.
  24. Kim YS, Lee CH, Kim SG, Chang KW : Dental Aesthetic Index (DAI) of adolescent in Chollabukdo-Province, Korea. J Korean Acad Dent Health, 26: 303-312, 2002.
  25. Son YJ, Hyun HK, Jang KT, et al. : The changes in practice patterns for the last 8 years (2001-2008) in the department of pediatric dentistry, Seoul National University Dental Hospital. J Korean Acad Pediatr Dent, 37:97-101, 2010.
  26. Kiyak HA : Does orthodontic treatment affect patients' quality of life? J Dent Educ, 72:886-894, 2008.
  27. Borzabadi-farhani A, Eslamipour F, Asgari I : Association between orthodontic treatment need and caries experience. Acta Odontol Scand, 69:2-11, 2011. https://doi.org/10.3109/00016357.2010.516732
  28. Gabris K, Marton S, Madlena M : Prevalence of malocclusions in Hungarian adolescents. Eur J Orthod, 28:467-470, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjl027
  29. Nobile CG, Pavia M, Fortunato L, Angelillo IF : Prevalence and factors related to malocclusion and orthodontic treatment need in children and adolescents in Italy. Eur J Public Health, 17:637-641, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckm016
  30. Helm S, Petersen PE : Causal relation between malocclusion and caries. Acta Odontol Scand, 47:212-221, 1989.
  31. Palin-Palokas T, Ruokokoski-Pirkkanen S : Occlusal features and caries experience. Proc Finn Dent Soc, 86:77-82, 1990.
  32. Thomson WM : Orthodontic treatment outcomes in the long term: findings from a longitudinal study of New Zealanders. Angle Orthod, 72:449-455, 2002.
  33. Baskaradoss JK, Geevarghese A, Rogerm C, Thaliath A : Prevalence of malocclusion and its relationship with caries among school children aged 11- 15 years in southern India. Korean J Orthod, 43:35-41, 2013. https://doi.org/10.4041/kjod.2013.43.1.35
  34. Stahl F, Grabowski R : Malocclusion and caries prevalence: is there a connection in the primary and mixed dentitions? Clin Oral Invest, 8:86-90, 2004.
  35. Hafez HS, Shaarawy SM, Alsakit AA, Mostafa YA : Dental crowding as a caries risk factor:a systematic review. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 142:443-450, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2012.04.018
  36. Proschel P : An extensive classification of chewing patterns in the frontal plane. Cranio, 5:56-63, 1987.
  37. Proschel P, Hofmann M, Spitzer W : Reaction of mastication to occlusal changes induced by correction of mandibular prognathism; J Prosth Dent, 64:211-218, 1990. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(90)90181-B
  38. Sung KH, Sung JH : A comparative study on chewing movement in normal occlusion and skeketal class III malocclulsion. Korean J Orthod, 27:801-813, 1997.
  39. Proffit WR, Fields HW, Sarver DM : Contemporary Orthodontics, 5th ed., Mosby, 133-145, 2012.
  40. Holmes A : The prevalence of orthodontic treatment need. British J Orthod, 19:177-182, 1992. https://doi.org/10.1179/bjo.19.3.177
  41. Kim SS, Kim DK, Hwang CJ, Park CY : The effects of related factors and perception of malocclusion on orthodontic treatment timing. J Korean Dent Assoc, 38:452-465, 2000.
  42. Thilander B, Pena L, Mayorga C, et al. : Prevalence of malocclusion and orthodontic treatment need in children and adolescents in Bogota, Colombia. An epidemiological study related to different stages of dental development. Eur J Orthod, 23:153-167, 2001. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/23.2.153