The Mathematical Education (한국수학교육학회지시리즈A:수학교육)

Korean Society of Mathematical Education (한국수학교육학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A study on the application of robotic programming to promote logical and critical thinking in mathematics education

논리·비판적 사고 신장을 위한 로봇 프로그래밍의 수학교육 적용 방안

  • Received : 2014.04.30
  • Accepted : 2014.08.12
  • Published : 2014.08.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Logic lays the foundation of Mathematics and the development of Mathematics is dependent on critical thinking. So it is important that school mathematics helps students develop their logical and critical thinking ability for both mathematics learning and problem solving in general. MINDSTORMS, a LEGO based programming activity kit, is an effective teaching and learning tool that can be used to enhance logical and critical thinking in students. This study focused on measuring the growth of students' ability to think logically and critically when they used MINDSTORMS activities to learn programming. In addition, we investigated how the students' logical and critical thinking changed from the MINDSTORMS learning experience. The study confirmed that the programming activities using MINDSTORMS help to enhance logical and critical thinking in students. The students attitude about logical and critical thinking became more positive and the activities helped to engage students to think logically and critically. This type of programming activities should be valuable in mathematics education and it should be included in a general mathematics curriculum.

Keywords

References

  1. 강문봉 (2009). 컴퓨터를 활용한 수학적 사고력 신장 방안, 과학교육논총 22(1), 37-54. (Kang, M. B. (2009). How to use the computer in order to develop the mathematical thinking. The Bulletin of Science Education 22(1), 37-54.)
  2. 고영해, 안재호, 박남제 (2011). LOGO 교육용 프로그래밍 언어를 이용한 프랙탈 기하이론 기반의 초등학교 컴퓨터교육 지도 방안, 한국정보기술학회논문지 9(8), 151-163. (Ko, Y. H., An, J. H., & Park, N. J. (2011). Elementary school computer education with the focus on case study bases on fractal geometry theory using LOGO programming language. Journal of Korean Institute of Information Technology 9(8), 151-163.)
  3. 교육인적자원부 (2007). 수학과 교육과정. 교육과학기술부 고시 제 2007-79호 [별책 8]. (Ministry of Education and Science Technology. (2007). Mathematics curriculum: MEST announcement 2007-79 [Separate Volume 8] . Seoul: MEST.)
  4. 교육과학기술부 (2011). 수학과 교육과정. 교육과학기술부 고시 제 2011-351호 [별책 8]. (Ministry of Education and Science Technology. (2011). Mathematics curriculum: MEST announcement 2011-351 [Separate Volume 8] . Seoul: MEST.)
  5. 김광수 (2007). 논리와 비판적 사고. 서울: 철학과 현실사. (Kim, K. S. (2007). Logic and critical thinking. Seoul: Philosophy and Reality Corp.)
  6. 김명숙, 박정, 김영정, 민찬홍, 오희숙 (2002). 사고력 검사 개발 연구(II). -비판적 사고력 검사 제작편-. 한국교육과정평가원 연구보고 RRE 2002-3. (Kim, M. A., Park, J., Kim, Y. J., Min, C. H., & Oh, H. S. (2002). A study for developing critical thinking test(II): Construction of the test. Korea Institute for Curriculum and Evaluation Research Report RRE 2002-3.)
  7. 김영국 (2012). 수학적 지식의 특성요소에 대한 수학교육전공 대학생의 인식 상황, 수학교육 51(2), 161-171. (Kim, Y. K. (2012). On mathematics education major students' conception of characteristics of mathematical knowledge. The Mathematical Education 51(2), 161-171.) https://doi.org/10.7468/mathedu.2012.51.2.161
  8. 김준섭(1993). 철학개론. 서울: 박영사. (Kim, J. S. (1993). An introduction to philosophy. Seoul: Pakyoungsa.)
  9. 김진숙, 황규호, 이원춘 (2013). 국가 교육과정의 연계성강화 방안. 한국교육과정평가원 연구보고 ORM 2013-35. (Kim, J. S., Hwang, G. H., & Li, Y. C. (2013). A study on methods of strengthening the sequence and integrity of National Curricula. Korea Institute for Curriculum and Evaluation Research Report ORM 2013-35.)
  10. 김철 (2013). 로봇 교육 관련 국내 연구동향 및 교육효과분석, 한국정보교육학회 논문지 16(2), 233-243. (Kim, C. (2013). An analysis of domestic research trend and educational effects in relation to robot education. Journal of the Korean Association of information Education 16(2), 223-243.)
  11. 김태희, 강문설 (2010). 레고 마인드스톰 로봇을 이용한 프로그래밍 입문 교육의 효과 측정, 한국인터넷정보학회지 11(4), 159-173. (Kim, T. H., & Kang, M. S. (2010). Measuring the effectiveness of teaching introductory programming using LEGO Mindstorms robots. Journal of Korean Society for Internet Information 11(4), 159-173.)
  12. 김화경 (2006). '컴퓨터와 수학교육' 학습-지도 환경에 관한 연구, 수학교육학연구 16(4), 367-386. (Kim, H. K. (2006). A Study on Learning and Teaching Environments for Computers and Mathematics Education. The Journal of Educational Research in Mathematics 16(4), 367-386.)
  13. 김화경, 송민호 (2007). Logo와 DGS의 매개 모델과 오류 사례, 수학교육학연구 17(2), 111-125. (Kim, H. K., & Song, M. H. (2007). A mediation model between Logo and DGS. The Journal of Educational Research in Mathematics 17(2), 111-125.)
  14. 남이준, 배상용, 서성원, 전현석, 조용만 (2009). ROBOLAB으로 즐기는 LEGO MINDSTORMS NXT. 서울: 이지테크. (Nam, Y. J., Bae, S. Y., Seo, S. W., Jeon, H. S., & Cho, Y. M. (2009). LEGO MINDSTORMS NXT Enjoying by ROBOLAB. Seoul: EasyTech.)
  15. 류희찬, 장인옥 (2010). LOGO를 이용한 프로젝트 학습에서 나타난 초등 수학영재 학생들의 전략적 사고. 수학교육학연구 20(4), 459-476. (Lew, H. C., & Jang, I. O. (2010). The strategic thinking of mathematically gifted elementary students in LOGO project learning. The Journal of Educational Research in Mathematics 20(4), 459-476.)
  16. 문외식 (2007). 교육용 로봇을 이용한 프로그래밍 학습모형 - 재량활동 및 특기적성 시간에 레고 마인드스톰의 Labview 언어 중심으로. 정보교육학회논문지 11(2), 191-208. (Moon, Y. S. (2007). A programming language learning model using educational robot. The Journal of the Korean Association of Information Education 11(2), 191-208.)
  17. 박선화, 문광호 (2009). 학교 교육 경쟁력 강화를 위한 수학과 교육과정 실행 방안 탐색 세미나. 한국교육과정평가원 연구자료 ORM 2009-25-1. (Park, S. H., & Moon, K. H. (2009). School education mathematics curriculum for the execution of measures of strengthening navigation seminar. Korea Institute for Curriculum and Evaluation Research Report ORM 2009-25-1.)
  18. 신이섭 외 (2011). 2009 개정 교육과정에 따른 수학과 교육과정 연구. 한국과학창의재단 정책연구 2011-11. (Shin, Y. S. et al. (2009). Research report on the mathematics curriculum according to the 2009 revised curriculum. Korean Foundation for the Advancement of Science and Creativity Research Report 2011-11.)
  19. 여훈근 (1999). 현대논리학. 서울: 민영사. (Yeo, H. K. (1999). Modern logic. Seoul: Minyoungsa.)
  20. 유인환, 김태완 (2006). MINDSTORMS을 이용한 프로그래밍 학습이 창의력에 미치는 효과. 컴퓨터교육학회 논문지 9(1), 1-11. (Yoo, I. H., & Kim, T. W. (2006). The effects of MINDSTORMS programming instruction on the creativity. The Journal of Korean Association of Computer Education 9(1), 1-11.)
  21. 조수남 (2012). 수학교육의 의의 및 교육 방식에 관한 역사적 고찰 - 케임브리지대학과 UCL의 사례를 중심으로. 한국수학교육학회지 시리즈 A 수학교육 51(2), 115-129. (Cho, S. N. (2012). Historical study on the values and methods of mathematics education: On the cases of Cambridge University and University College, London. The Mathematical Eucation 51(2), 115-129.) https://doi.org/10.7468/mathedu.2012.51.2.115
  22. 한상기 (2007). 비판적 사고와 논리. 파주: 서광사. (Han, S. K. (2007). Critical thinking and logic. Paju:Seogwangsa.)
  23. 홍기천, 심재국 (2013). 교육용 로봇을 활용한 초등학교 과학교과의 STEAM 교육 수업 방안. 한국정보교육학회지 17(1), 83-91. (Hong, K. C., & Shim, J. K. (2013). A study of STEAM education for elementary science subject with robots. Journal of the Korean Association of Information Education 17(1). 83-91.)
  24. 황선욱 외 32명 (2011). 창의 중심의 미래형 수학과 교과내용 개선 및 교육과정 개정 시안 연구. 한국과학창의재단 2011-4. (Hwang, S. W. et al. (2011). Research report on a draft proposal related to the creativity-centered futuristic mathematics curriculum content improvement and revision of the curriculum in the center of the window. Korean Foundation for the Advancement of Science and Creativity Research 2011-4.)
  25. 황혜정, 나귀수, 최승현, 박경미, 임재훈, 서동엽 (2008). 수학교육학신론. 서울:문음사. (Hwang, H. J., Na, G. S., Choi, S. H., Park, K. M., Lim, J. H., & Seo, D. Y. (2008). New theories of mathematics education. Seoul: Moonumsa.)
  26. Ackermann, E. (2001). Piaget's Constructivism, Papert's Constructionism: What's the difference? CONSTRUCTIVISM: USES AND PERSPECTIVES IN EDUCATION, VOLUMES 1 & 2. Conference proceedings, Geneva Research Center in Education.
  27. Alimisis, D. (2013). Educational robotics: Open questions and new challenges. Themes in Science & Technology Education 6(1), 63-71.
  28. Cho, H. H., Song, M. H., Lee, J. Y., & Kim, H. K. (2011). On the design of Logo-based educational microworld environment. Research in Mathematical Education 15(1), 15-30.
  29. Cho, H. H., Shin, D. J., & Ann, S. W. (2012). Development of covariational reasoning in a LOGO-based JavaMAL microworld. Research in Mathematical Education 16(1), 1-13.
  30. Erdogan, N., Coru, M. S., & Capraro, R. M.(2013), Defining innovation literacy: Do robotics programs help students develop innovation literacy skills? International Online Journal of Education Sciences, 5(1), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1080/09751122.2013.11890055
  31. Eves, H. (1990). Foundations and Fundamental Concepts of Mathematics. 3rd. ed. Boston:PWS-Kent. (허민, 오혜영 역 (1997). 수학의 기초와 기본 개념. 서울: 경문사.)
  32. Freudenthal, H. (1983). Mathematics as an educational task. Dorderecht: D. Reidel Publishing Company.
  33. Glennon, V. J. (1980). Neuropsychology and the instructional psychology of mathematics. The 7th Annual Conf. Research Council for diagnostic and prescriptive mathematics.
  34. Katz, V. J. (2004). The history of mathematics: Brief Version. Pearson Education Inc.
  35. Kereen, T. M. (2009). Constructionism. http://etec.ctlt.ubc.ca/510wiki/Constructionism 검색일 2013. 8. 29.
  36. Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: experience as the source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  37. Lee, J. Y., Cho, H. H., Song, M. H., & Kim, H. K. (2011). Representation systems of building blocks in Logo-based microworld. Research in Mathematical Education 15(1), 1-14.
  38. Lithner, J. (2008). A research framework for creative and imitative reasoning. ESM 67(3), 255-276.
  39. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics(2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
  40. Papert, S. (1980). MINDSTORM: Children, computer, and powerful ideas. New York: Basic Books.
  41. Peng, A. (2007). A case study of developing students' ability to design algorithm in LOGO environment, Research in Mathematical Education 11(1), 65-74.
  42. Ricca, B., Lulis, E., & Bade, D. (2006). Lego Mindstorms and the Growth of Critical Thinking. Intelligent Tutoring Systems Workshop on Teaching With Robots, Agents, and NLP.
  43. Whitman, L. & Witherspoon, T. (2003). Using LEGOs to interest high school students and improve K12 STEM education. 33rd ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference.
  44. Williams, K., Igel, I., & Islander, M. (2012). Enriching K-12 Science and Mathematics Education Using LEGOs. Advances in Engineering Education.
  45. Wikipedia(2014). http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Logic
  46. Yousuf, M., Chaveznava, R., & Hernandez, V. (2006). Robotics projects to enhance student participation, motivation and learning. Current Developments in Technology-Assisted Education.

Cited by

  1. The Effect of Activities using Hands-on Robots on Logic-Mathematical Knowledge and Creative Problem-Solving Ability of Young Children vol.12, pp.3, 2017, https://doi.org/10.7746/jkros.2017.12.3.287
  2. 수학교육에서 계산적 사고(Computational Thinking)의 의미 및 연구 동향 탐색 vol.58, pp.4, 2014, https://doi.org/10.7468/mathedu.2019.58.4.483
  3. Development and Application of a 3D Coding Environment for Mathematics Learning vol.30, pp.2, 2014, https://doi.org/10.29275/jerm.2020.05.30.2.199