DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

사회적 관계에 따른 소형주택 선호에 관한 연구 - 대학생을 중심으로-

A Study on the Preference of the Small House according to Social Relationship

  • 신화경 (상명대학교 소비자주거학과) ;
  • 조인숙 (상명대학교 소비자주거학과)
  • 투고 : 2014.03.31
  • 심사 : 2014.07.07
  • 발행 : 2014.08.25

초록

The purpose of the study was to find out the preference of small house as the social relations of university students. The data for the analysis were collected through questionnaire survey method from September 24 to October 12, 2012, and the sample consisted of 283 students of the university in Seoul. The social relationship has been surveyed using modified life-style indicators. The community spaces and equipment in the small house has been divided into 21 community spaces and 3 equipments. The characteristics of small house preference were consisted of the residential comments, residence time, resident partner, house size, considered factors of the residence and small house ownership. The finding of this study were as following: 1) The social relationship of respondents were typed as the type of relationship oriented (oriented family, oriented friends and neighbors) and type of non-relationship oriented. The social relationship of respondents were the type of relationship oriented. 2) The respondents are willing to live in small houses, to live with 1-2 people and after work. When living in small house, they consider public transport accessibility and ease of use amenities. But neighbor relationship is not considered. 3) They are preferred security office, administrative office, home storage, parks and green space.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. LG경제연구원 (2011). 2011 소비자 라이프스타일. 서울: LG경제연구원.
  2. 국토해양부 (2007). 미래주거환경 비전 및 전략 연구. 과천: 국토해양부.
  3. 서울시정개발연구원 (2008). 서울의 1인가구 증가와 도시정책수요 연구. 서울: 서울시정개발연구원.
  4. 지규현 외 4인 (2010). 1인가구 주택수요 증가의 도시 계획적 함의. 도시정보. 337, 3-15.
  5. Putnam (2009). 나 홀로 볼링. 정승현 역. 서울: 페이퍼로드.
  6. Berkman, L. F., Glass, T., Brissette, I., & Seeman, T. E. (2000). From Social Integration to Health: Durkheim in the New Millennium. Social Science & Medicine, 51(6), 843-857. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0277-9536(00)00065-4
  7. Cantor, N., & Anderson, C. A. (1999). Life Task Participation and Well-Being: The Importance of Taking Part in Daily Life. In D. Kahneman et al. (Ed.), Well-being: The Foundations of Hedonic Psychology, New York: Sage.
  8. Choi, E. (2000). Social networks, social support and mental health and physical health of the elderly. Journal of Society and Culture, 11, 185-203.
  9. Jun, J. (2010). The Study of Improvement Method Concerns Urban type Housing Issues. a Master's Thesis, Seoul National University of Technology, Seoul.
  10. Jung, Y. (2011). Analysis of Structure between Formative Factors of City Image by Structural Equation Model: Focused on Teheranno. a Master's Thesis, Hongik Univ, Seoul.
  11. John G. (1987). Life Between Buildings. Washington DC: Island Press.
  12. Kang, S. et al. (2011). A Study on 1-2 Person Household's Lifestyle and Needs of Small Houses. Journal of Korean Housing Association, 22(2), 121-129.
  13. Kim, B. and Suh, K. (2013). The Plan Ion Community Housing for Small-scale Single-households. Proceeding of Korean Housing Association, 25(2), 331-335.
  14. Lee, E. (2013). Social relationships and happiness in middle-aged housewives. a Master's Thesis, Seoul Univ. Seoul.
  15. Lee, E. et al. 3 (2013). An improvement on the sharing amenities of the Urbanistic Housing in recent days for 1-2 person households. Proceeding of Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea, 33(2), 47-49.
  16. Lee, G. (2012). And older adults in volunteer activities through the social networks impact on the subjective quality of life. a Master's Thesis, Korea Univ, Seoul.
  17. Lee, I. and Kim, M. (2009). A Study on the Characteristics of the Space Composition of Single-Resident-Oriented Urban Style Housing. Proceeding of Korean Insititute of Interior Design, 11(1), 59-63.
  18. Lee, J. and Seong, S. (2013). Development Characteristics and Supply Effect Evaluation of Urban-type Housing in Seoul. Journal of Korea Planners Association, 48(4), 305-317.
  19. Lee, S. et al. 2 (2013). Housing Consciousness and Oneperson Household type Preference of 20's-30's. Proceeding of Korean Housing Association, 25(2), 319-324.
  20. No, Y. and Kim, S. (2013). Study of Urban Residential Selection Factors. Proceeding of Korea Institute of Electronics and Telecommunications, 7(2), 86-89.
  21. Olsen, J. K. (1979). The effect of change in activity in voluntary associations on life satisfaction among people 60 and over who have been active through time. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Maryland, Maryland.
  22. Sul, D. and Woo, Y. (2012). 1-2 person households increased the efficiency of the housing policy. Journal of GIAPA, 12(4), 217-242.
  23. Sung, L. (2013). A Suggestion of 1-2 Person Household Unit Plan in Urban-Compact Housing for the Target Group Having New Lifestyle. Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea, 29(7), 119-126.
  24. Woo, S. and Nam, K. (2012). A Study on the Development Directions for the Urban-life-housing Reflecting Characteristics of Single-person Households. Proceeding of Korean Insititute of Interior Design, 14(3), 65-68.
  25. Yoo, H. and Sim, W. (2010). A Study on the Design Characteristic of the Housing for Urban Lifestyle. Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea, 26(5), 113-120.
  26. Yoon, C. (2009). A Study on the Complementary Measures for Constructing One Room Type Urban Living Homes. a Master's Thesis, Kookmin Univ, Seoul.
  27. 백승기(2013. 2. 27). 대학생, 새학기 중후군, MTN.
  28. 이규성(2013. 6. 27). 혼자 놀기에 빠진 대한민국, 아시아경제.
  29. 홍정수(2014. 3. 18). 화장실서 혼자 밥 먹는 대학생. 동아일보. p 3. A13.
  30. 통계청(2006). 사망원인통계.
  31. 통계청(2010). 장래가구추계.

피인용 문헌

  1. Analysis on the Rental Housing Service Preferences according to Social Relationship vol.27, pp.6, 2016, https://doi.org/10.6107/JKHA.2016.27.6.113