DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Investigation for analysis methods of water intake and perception on the tap water : the survey result on the seoul tap water, arisu

수돗물 음용 및 인식 분석방법에 대한 고찰 : 서울 수돗물 아리수에 대한 설문 결과

  • Huh, Jun-Rim (Institute of Environmental Issues, Ewha Womans University) ;
  • Bhnag, Kon Joon (School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Kumoh National nI stitute of Technology)
  • 허정림 (이대환경문제연구소) ;
  • 방건준 (금오공과대학교 토목환경공학부)
  • Received : 2014.07.01
  • Accepted : 2014.08.11
  • Published : 2014.08.15

Abstract

The tap water plays a critical role in our daily life by providing clean water for drinking as well as for residential use. Its importance, however, is often hidden and criticized in mass media because drinking the unprocessed tap water as a primary source of drinking water is very low comparing to other countries. This is because survey tool in Korea is often different from those in other countries so their results on the tap water cannot be directly compared without analysis on survey questionnaire. Therefore, we examplified cases showing the difference of questions of each country and discussed the reason why results of tap water intake should not be compared without analysis on the questions. Also, distrust on Arisu without rational reason is known as the first reason of distrust on the tap water. However, it was not the ultimate reason of distrust on the tap water. To verify, we designed survey questions in a tricky way that the same question was asked twice with different choices in the survey questionnaire. Most of the people who distrust Arisu without rational reason at the first question were selected different choices and significantly reduced in the second question. This proved that the ratio of distrust on the tap water is not actually the right reason and that by providing more choices, people's distrust on the tap water without rational reason can turn into more specific reasons.

Keywords

References

  1. Choi, S.I. (2006). Participation of Residents for Improvement of Water quality and Confidence. Journal of Korean Society of Water and Wastewater. 20(2), 167-174.
  2. Doria, M.F. (2006) Bottled water versus tap water: understanding consumers' preferences. Journal of Water and Health. 4, pp. 271-276
  3. Doria, M.F., N. Pidgeion, and P.R. Hunter (2009). Perceptions of drinking water quality and risk and its effect on behaviour: A crossnational study. Science of the Total Environment, 407, 5455-5464. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2009.06.031
  4. Huh, J.R. Choi, G.H., Park, S.S. (2010) A Survey of Seoul Citizens' Usage and Awareness of Tap Water. Journal of Korean Environmental Education, 24, 4, 78-93.
  5. Huh, J.R. (2012). Study on the tap water drinking promotion with analysis of current status in Seoul citizen and middle, high school students. Ph.D dissertation, Ewha Womans University.
  6. Jang, J.Y., Yoon, J.Y., Cho, S.N., Kim, S.Y., (2011) The Main Factors Influencing on the Perceptions of Tap Water among Seoul Citizens. Korean Society of Water and Wastewater, 15(5), 365-378.
  7. Kim, J.A. (2003) World Ranking #8 of Korean Water and Water Source. Dong-a Ilbo, Mar. 7th, 2003.
  8. Kim, S.T. (2005) A Study on the Media coverage of Public Issue: Focusing on Drinking-Water Issues. Korean Journal of Communication & Information, 39, 40-68.
  9. Mustel Group (2011). Metro VAncouver Drinking Water Research.
  10. Park, D.H., Kim, S.M. (2007) A Consumers' Behavior Analysis of Municipal Water. Procedings of Fall Conference of Korean Society of Water Quality, 2007, 347-350.
  11. Tap Water Public Information Union (2011) An Abstract of 2011 Tap Water Satisfaction Survey Report of 2011. Ministry of Environment.
  12. U.S. EPA (2003). Analysis and findings of the gallup organization's drinking water customer satisfaction survey. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, pp. 4.
  13. World Research (2005). Whole Nation's Public Opinion Report on Solution for Tap Water Distrust by Survey. Ministry of Environment.
  14. Yoon, T.I. (2005) Seoul Citizens' Perception on the Tap Water. Symposium of Korean society for Journalism and Communication Studies, 2005, 55-95.