DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Characteristics and Limitations of Bedside Teaching Instructional Models

침상 옆 교육의 교수설계모형의 특징과 한계

  • Kim, Young Jon (Department of Family Medicine, Wonkwang University Hospital) ;
  • Lim, Cheol Il (Department of Education, Seoul National University College of Education)
  • 김영전 (원광대학교병원 가정의학과) ;
  • 임철일 (서울대학교 사범대학 교육학과)
  • Received : 2013.09.23
  • Accepted : 2013.10.16
  • Published : 2014.02.28

Abstract

As a preliminary approach to developing a bedside teaching program, this study analyzed the instructional models that have been suggested for bedside teaching. The objects of analysis were four models: the 'Cox model,' which is composed of an experience cycle and an explanation cycle; the 'best teaching practice model' by Janicik and Fletcher; the 'twelve tips to improve bedside teaching' by Ramani; and the SNNAPS model for outpatient education by Wolpaw, Wolpaw, and Papp. This study was conducted in three steps. First, we identified the major components of each model and analyzed their characteristics and limitations. Second, we compared each model in terms of four aspects: the learner, learning interaction, learning context, and organization management. Third, on the basis of prior analysis, the possibilities and potential problems of the models were explored. Based on this review of the existing instructional design models, we proposed an additional four key elements for designing a bedside teaching program: multi-layered learners, various learning environments and contexts, time management by using media, and self-directed design.

Keywords

References

  1. Cox, K. (1993). Planning bedside teaching: 1. overview. Med J Aust, 158(4), 280-282.
  2. Crumlish, C. M., Yialamas, M. A., & McMahon, G. T. (2009). Quantification of bedside teaching by an academic hospitalist group. J Hosp Med, 4(5), 304-307. https://doi.org/10.1002/jhm.540
  3. Janicik, R. W., & Fletcher, K. E. (2003). Teaching at the bedside: a new model. Med Teach, 25(2), 127-130. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159031000092490
  4. Jung, S. S., & Kim, S. Y. (2011). Experience of bedside teaching during clerkship in pulmonary medicine for improving clinical performance. Korean J Med Educ, 23(1), 41-47. https://doi.org/10.3946/kjme.2011.23.1.41
  5. K Ahmed, M. E. (2002). What is happening to bedside clinical teaching? Med Educ, 36(12), 1185-1188. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2923.2002.01372.x
  6. LaCombe, M. A. (1997). On bedside teaching. Ann Intern Med, 126(3), 217-220. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-126-3-199702010-00007
  7. Lim, C. I. (2012). Theory and models for instructional design (2nd ed.). Seoul: Kyoyookbook.
  8. Miller, M., Johnson, B., Greene, H.L., Baier, M., & Nowlin, S. (1992). An observational study of attending rounds. J Gen Intern Med, 7(6), 646-648. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02599208
  9. Nair, B. R., Coughlan, J. L., & Hensley, M. J. (1997). Student and patient perspectives on bedside teaching. Med Educ, 31(5), 341-346. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2923.1997.00673.x
  10. Neher, J. O., Gordon, K. C., Meyer, B., & Stevens, N. (1992). A five-step "microskills" model of clinical teaching. J Am Board Fam Pract, 5(4), 419-424.
  11. Ramani, S. (2003). Twelve tips to improve bedside teaching. Med Teach, 25(2), 112-115. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159031000092463
  12. Shankel, S. W., & Mazzaferri, E. L. (1986). Teaching the resident in internal medicine. Present practices and suggestions for the future. JAMA, 256(6), 725-729. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1986.03380060051024
  13. Thibault, G. E. (1997). Bedside rounds revisited. N Engl J Med, 336(16), 1174-1175. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199704173361610
  14. Williams, K. N., Ramani, S., Fraser, B., & Orlander, J. D. (2008). Improving bedside teaching: findings from a focus group study of learners. Acad Med, 83(3), 257-264. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181637f3e
  15. Wolpaw, T. M., Wolpaw, D. R., & Papp, K. K. (2003). SNAPPS: a learner-centered model for outpatient education. Acad Med, 78(9), 893-898. https://doi.org/10.1097/00001888-200309000-00010
  16. Yang, E., Suh, D. J., Lee, Y., Lee, S., Kim, S., Lee, E., … Ahn, D. (2007). Status of clerkship education and its evaluation in Korean medical schools. Korean J Med Educ, 19(2), 111-121. https://doi.org/10.3946/kjme.2007.19.2.111

Cited by

  1. Bedside Education Will Be More Important than Now in the Age of Artificial Intelligence vol.18, pp.2, 2016, https://doi.org/10.17496/kmer.2016.18.2.58