The Journal of Korean Academy of Prosthodontics (대한치과보철학회지)

The Korean Academy of Prosthodonitics (대한치과보철학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effect of the marginal position of prosthesis on stress distribution of teeth with abfraction lesion using finite element analysis

보철물 변연의 위치가 abfraction된 치아의 응력 분포에 미치는 영향에 대한 유한요소법적 분석

  • Kim, Myeong-Hyeon (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Kyungpook National University) ;
  • Lee, Cheong-Hee (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Kyungpook National University)
  • 김명현 (경북대학교 치의학전문대학원 치과보철학교실) ;
  • 이청희 (경북대학교 치의학전문대학원 치과보철학교실)
  • Received : 2014.05.16
  • Accepted : 2014.06.30
  • Published : 2014.07.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate the stress concentration and distribution whether restoring the cavity or not while restoring with metal ceramic crown on tooth with abfraction lesion using finite element analysis. Materials and methods: Maxillary first premolar was selected and made a total of 10 finite element model. Model 1 was natural tooth; Model 2 was tooth with metal ceramic crown restoration which margin was positioned above 2 mm from CEJ; Model 3 was tooth with metal ceramic crown restoration which margin was positioned on CEJ; Model 4 was natural tooth which has abfraction lesion; Model 5 and 6 had abfraction lesion and the other condition was same as model 2 and 3, respectively; Model 7 was natural tooth which had abfraction lesion restored with composite resin; Model 8 and 9 was tooth with metal ceramic crown after restoring on abfraction lesion with composite resin; Model 10 was restored tooth on abfraction lesion with composite resin and metal ceramic crown restoration which margin is positioned on lower border of abfraction lesion. Load A and Load B was also designed. Von Mises value was evaluated on each point. Results: Under load A or load B, on tooth with abfraction lesion, stress was concentrated on the apex of lesion. Under load A or load B, on tooth that abfraction lesion was restored with composite resin, the stress value was reduced on the apex. Conclusion: In case of abfraction lesion was restored with composite resin, the stress was concentrated on the apical border of restored cavity regardless of marginal position. It was favorable to place crown margin on the enamel for restoring with metal ceramic crown.

목적: 이 연구의 목적은 abfraction병소가 있는 금속도재관수복 치아를 수복하거나 하지 않을 때 나타나는 응력집중과 분포를 유한요소분석으로 평가하는 것이다. 재료 및 방법: 상악 제1 소구치를 선정하여 총 10개의 유한요소모델을 만들었다. 모델 1은 자연치; 모델 2는 협측과구개측 백악법랑경계 상방 2 mm에 변연이 위치한 금속도재관; 모델 3은 협측과구개측 백악법랑경계에 변연이 위치한 금속도재관; 모델 4는 abfraction병소를 가진 자연치; 모델 5와 6은 다른 조건은 각각 모델 2와 3과 동일하면서 abfraction병소를 가진 치아; 모델 7은 abfraction병소를 가지고 composite resin으로 수복된 자연치;모델 8과 9는 각각 모델 5와 6과 동일한 모델에 abfraction병소를 composite resin으로 수복한 후 금속도재관 장착한 치아; 모델 10은 composite resin으로 abfraction lesion을 수복하고 금속도재관의변연을 abfraction병소보다 하방에 위치시킨 치아였다. 위치를 서로 달리한 하중 load A와 load B를 가하여, 각 기준점에서의 von Mises stress값들을 측정하여 비교하였다. 결과: Abfraction병소가 있는 치아에 load A 또는 load B를 주었을 때, 응력은 lesion의 apex에 집중되었다. 반면, abfraction병소를 composite resin으로 충전한 치아에 load A 또는 load B를 주었을 때 응력값은 apex에서 감소하였다. 결론: Abfraction이 있는 치아는 복합 레진으로 수복해주는 것이 응력의 집중을 줄여서 병소의 예후에 유리한 것으로 나타났으며, Abfraction이 발생된 치아를 금속 도재관으로 수복할 경우 협측변연을 법랑질 상에 위치시키는 것이 유리하였다.

Keywords

References

  1. McCoy G. The etiology of gingival erosion. J Oral Implantol 1982;10:361-2.
  2. Lee WC, Eakle WS. Possible role of tensile stress in the etiology of cervical erosive lesions of teeth. J Prosthet Dent 1984;52:374-80. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(84)90448-7
  3. Grippo JO. Abfractions: a new classification of hard tissue lesions of teeth. J Esthet Dent 1991;3:14-9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8240.1991.tb00799.x
  4. Nohl FS, McCabe JF, Walls AWG. The effect of load angle on strains induced in maxillary premolars in vitro. J Dent Res 1999;78:1059.
  5. Lambrechts P, Braem M, Vanherle G. Buonocore memorial lecture. Evaluation of clinical performance for posterior composite resins and dentin adhesives. Oper Dent 1987;12:53-78.
  6. Xhonga FA. Bruxism and its effect on the teeth. J Oral Rehabil 1977;4:65-76. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.1977.tb00967.x
  7. Burke FJ, Whitehead SA, McCaughey AD. Contemporary concepts in the pathogenesis of the Class V non-carious lesion. Dent Update 1995;22:28-32.
  8. Rees JS, Jacobsen PH. Modelling the effects of enamel anisotropy with the finite element method. J Oral Rehabil 1995;22:451-4. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.1995.tb00800.x
  9. Pintado MR, Delong R, Ko CC, Sakaguchi RL, Douglas WH. Correlation of noncarious cervical lesion size and occlusal wear in a single adult over a 14-year time span. J Prosthet Dent 2000;84:436-43. https://doi.org/10.1067/mpr.2000.109477
  10. Telles D, Pegoraro LF, Pereira JC. Prevalence of noncarious cervical lesions and their relation to occlusal aspects: a clinical study. J Esthet Dent 2000;12:10-5. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8240.2000.tb00193.x
  11. Dejak B, Mlotkowski A, Romanowicz M. Finite element analysis of mechanism of cervical lesion formation in simulated molars during mastication and parafunction. J Prosthet Dent 2005;94:520-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2005.10.001
  12. Spranger H. Investigation into the genesis of angular lesions at the cervical region of teeth. Quintessence Int 1995;26:149-54.
  13. Rees JS. A review of the biomechanics of abfraction. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent 2000;8:139-44.
  14. Tanaka M, Naito T, Yokota M, Kohno M. Finite element analysis of the possible mechanism of cervical lesion formation by occlusal force. J Oral Rehabil 2003;30:60-7. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2842.2003.00959.x
  15. Borcic J, Anic I, Smojver I, Catic A, Miletic I, Ribaric SP. 3D finite element model and cervical lesion formation in normal occlusion and in malocclusion. J Oral Rehabil 2005;32:504-10. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.2005.01455.x
  16. Piotrowski BT, Gillette WB, Hancock EB. Examining the prevalence and characteristics of abfractionlike cervical lesions in a population of U.S. veterans. J Am Dent Assoc 2001;132:1694-701. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.2001.0122
  17. Goel VK, Khera SC, Ralston JL, Chang KH. Stresses at the dentinoenamel junction of human teeth-a finite element investigation. J Prosthet Dent 1991;66:451-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(91)90504-P
  18. Rees JS, Hammadeh M, Jagger DC. Abfraction lesion formation in maxillary incisors, canines and premolars: a finite element study. Eur J Oral Sci 2003;111:149-54. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0722.2003.00018.x
  19. Robinson C, Kirkham J, Brookes SJ, Shore RC. Chemistry of Mature enamel. In: Dental enamel-formation to destruction. In: Robinson C, Kirkham J, Sore RC, eds. CRC Press; Boca Raton;FL; 1995. p. 137.
  20. Meredith N, Sherriff M, Setchell DJ, Swanson SA. Measurement of the microhardness and Young's modulus of human enamel and dentine using an indentation technique. Arch Oral Biol 1996;41:539-45. https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-9969(96)00020-9
  21. Goel VK, Khera SC, Ralston JL, Chang KH. Stresses at the dentinoenamel junction of human teeth-a finite element investigation. J Prosthet Dent 1991;66:451-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(91)90504-P
  22. Poole DF, Newman HN, Dibdin GH. Structure and porosity of human cervical enamel studied by polarizing microscopy and transmission electron microscopy. Arch Oral Biol 1981;26:977-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-9969(81)90106-0
  23. Scott JH, Symons NBB. Introduction to dental anatomy. 9th ed. Edinburgh; Churchill Livingstone; UK. 1982.
  24. Braem M, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. Stress-induced cervical lesions. J Prosthet Dent 1992;67:718-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(92)90178-D
  25. Borcic J, Anic I, Urek MM, Ferreri S. The prevalence of noncarious cervical lesions in permanent dentition. J Oral Rehabil 2004;31:117-23. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0305-182X.2003.01223.x
  26. Kim HJ, Kim SJ, Choi JI, Lee JY. Effects of non-carious cervical lesions and class V restorations on periodontal conditions. J Korean Acad Periodontol 2009;39:17-26. https://doi.org/10.5051/jkape.2009.39.1.17
  27. Spears IR. A three-dimensional finite element model of prismatic enamel: a re-appraisal of the data on the Young's modulus of enamel. J Dent Res 1997;76:1690-7. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345970760101101
  28. Vasudeva G, Bogra P, Nikhil V, Singh V. Effect of occlusal restoration on stresses around class V restoration interface: a finiteelement study. Indian J Dent Res 2011;22:295-302. https://doi.org/10.4103/0970-9290.84308
  29. Vandewalle KS, Vigil G. Guidelines for the restoration of Class V lesions. Gen Dent 1997;45:254-60.
  30. N S, N M, Shetty A, Kumari A, Dn N. Finite element analysis of stress concentration in Class V restorations of four groups of restorative materials in mandibular premolar. J Conserv Dent 2008;11:121-6. https://doi.org/10.4103/0972-0707.45251
  31. Peumans M, De Munck J, Van Landuyt KL, Kanumilli P, Yoshida Y, Inoue S, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B. Restoring cervical lesions with flexible composites. Dent Mater 2007;23: 749-54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2006.06.013
  32. Rees JS, Hammadeh M. Undermining of enamel as a mechanism of abfraction lesion formation: a finite element study. Eur J Oral Sci 2004;112:347-52. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0722.2004.00143.x
  33. Kuroe T, Itoh H, Caputo AA, Konuma M. Biomechanics of cervical tooth structure lesions and their restoration. Quintessence Int 2000;31:267-74.
  34. Um CM, Kwon HC, Son HH, Cho BH, Rim YI. Finite element analysis of stress distribution according to cavity design of class v composite resin filling. J Korean Acad Conserv Dent 1999;24:67-75.