DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The effect of ankle Kinesio taping on range of motion and agility during exercise in university students

  • Eom, Se Young (Department of Physical Therapy, Andong Science College) ;
  • Lee, Won Jun (Department of Physical Therapy, Andong Science College) ;
  • Lee, Jae Il (Department of Physical Therapy, Andong Science College) ;
  • Lee, Eun Hee (Department of Physical Therapy, Andong Science College) ;
  • Lee, Hye Young (Department of Physical Therapy, Andong Science College) ;
  • Chung, Eun Jung (Department of Physical Therapy, Andong Science College)
  • Received : 2014.05.03
  • Accepted : 2014.06.11
  • Published : 2014.06.26

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of ankle Kinesio taping on range of motion and agility during exercise in university students. Design: Cross-sectional study. Methods: Thirty subjects were randomly allocated to two groups: taping group (n=15) and non-taping group (n=15). All groups underwent the same exercise program including stretching for 30 minutes. The exercise program proceeded in the following order: five minutes of stretching, a 20-minutes exercise program, and additional five minutes of stretching. Of the eight exercise methods suggested by Purcell et al, seven were chosen (lateral shuffle, forward and backward running, agility ladder, figure-of-8, forward jogging while jumping over cones, wall jumps and zigzags); $90^{\circ}$ cuts with lateral shuffle were omitted. The range of motion of ankle dorsiflexion and plantarflexion was measured using the goniometer. Agility was measured using the side hop test. Results: For ankle range of motion, the taping group showed significant differences in dorsiflexion and plantarflexion on both sides (p<0.05). The non-taping group showed significant differences only in left plantarflexion (p<0.05). There was a significant difference in dorsiflexion on both sides between the taping group and the non-taping group (p<0.05). All groups showed significant differences in agility on the left and right ankle (p<0.05). There was a significant difference in left ankles between the taping group and the non-taping group (p<0.05). Conclusions: Kinesio taping increased range of motion and agility during exercise in university students. Additional research on Kinesio taping for improving range of motion and agility is needed.

Keywords

References

  1. van Rijn RM, van Os AG, Bernsen RM, Luijsterburg PA, Koes BW, Bierma-Zeinstra SM. What is the clinical course of acute ankle sprains? A systematic literature review. Am J Med 2008;121:324-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjmed.2007.11.018
  2. Heit EJ, Lephart SM, Rozzi SL. The effect of ankle bracing and taping on joint position sense in the stable ankle. J Sport Rehabil 1996;5:206-13.
  3. Aguilar-Ferrandiz ME, Moreno-Lorenzo C, Mataran-Penarrocha GA, Garcia-Muro F, Garcia-Rios MC, Castro-Sanchez AM. Effect of a mixed kinesio taping-compression technique on quality of life and clinical and gait parameters in postmenopausal women with chronic venous insufficiency: double-blinded, randomized controlled trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2014. [Epub ahead of print]
  4. Yoshida A, Kahanov L. The effect of kinesio taping on lower trunk range of motions. Res Sports Med 2007;15:103-12. https://doi.org/10.1080/15438620701405206
  5. Kang MH, Kim JW, Kim MH, Park TJ, Park JH, Oh JS. Influence of walking with talus taping on the ankle dorsiflexion passive range of motion. J Phys Ther Sci 2013;25:1011-3. https://doi.org/10.1589/jpts.25.1011
  6. Merino-Marban R, Mayorga-Vega D, Fernandez-Rodriguez E. Effect of kinesio tape application on calf pain and ankle range of motion in duathletes. J Hum Kinet 2013;37:129-35.
  7. Park J, Choi W, Lee S. Effects of immediate unilateral whole body vibration on muscle performance and balance in young adults. Phys Ther Rehabil Sci 2013;2:115-8. https://doi.org/10.14474/ptrs.2013.2.2.115
  8. Laymon MS, Petrofsky JS, Alshammari F, Fisher S. Evidencebased use of cold for plantar fasciitis. Phys Ther Rehabil Sci 2013;2:75-80. https://doi.org/10.14474/ptrs.2013.2.2.75
  9. Petrofsky J, Laymon M, Mcgrew R, Papa D, Hahn R, Kaethler R, et al. A comparison of the aerobic cost and muscle use in aerobic dance to the energy costs and muscle use on treadmill, elliptical trainer and bicycle ergometry. Phys Ther Rehabil Sci 2013;2:12-20.
  10. Lins CA, Neto FL, Amorim AB, Macedo Lde B, Brasileiro JS. Kinesio Taping(R) does not alter neuromuscular performance of femoral quadriceps or lower limb function in healthy subjects: randomized, blind, controlled, clinical trial. Man Ther 2013;18:41-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.math.2012.06.009
  11. Purcell SB, Schuckman BE, Docherty CL, Schrader J, Poppy W. Differences in ankle range of motion before and after exercise in 2 tape conditions. Am J Sports Med 2009;37:383-9. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546508325925
  12. Raya MA, Gailey RS, Gaunaurd IA, Jayne DM, Campbell SM, Gagne E, et al. Comparison of three agility tests with male servicemembers: Edgren Side Step Test, T-Test, and Illinois Agility Test. J Rehabil Res Dev 2013;50:951-60. https://doi.org/10.1682/JRRD.2012.05.0096
  13. Curwin S, Stanish W. Tendinitis: it's etiology and treatment. Lexington (MA): Collamore Press; 1984.
  14. Miller J, Westrick R, Diebal A, Marks C, Gerber JP. Immediate effects of lumbopelvic manipulation and lateral gluteal kinesio taping on unilateral patellofemoral pain syndrome: a pilot study. Sports Health 2013;5:214-9. https://doi.org/10.1177/1941738112473561
  15. Wheeler TJ, Basnett CR, Hanish MJ, Miriovsky DJ, Danielson EL, Barr JB, et al. Fibular taping does not influence ankle dorsiflexion range of motion or balance measures in individuals with chronic ankle instability. J Sci Med Sport 2013;16:488-92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsams.2013.02.012
  16. Quackenbush KE, Barker PR, Stone Fury SM, Behm DG. The effects of two adhesive ankle-taping methods on strength, power, and range of motion in female athletes. N Am J Sports Phys Ther 2008;3:25-32.
  17. Johnson BL, Nelson JK. Practical measurement for Evaluation in physical education. Minneapolis: Burgress Publishing; 1998.
  18. Perrin DH. Athletic taping and bracing. 2nd ed. Stanningley: Human Kinetics; 2005.
  19. Sprigings EJ, Pelton JD, Brandell BR. An EMG analysis of the effectiveness of external ankle support during sudden ankle inversion. Can J Appl Sport Sci 1981;6:72-5.

Cited by

  1. The effect of hip joint exercise using an elastic band on dynamic balance, agility and flexibility in healthy subjects: a randomized controlled trial vol.5, pp.4, 2016, https://doi.org/10.14474/ptrs.2016.5.4.198
  2. Agility profile in collegiate athletes with chronic ankle sprain: the effect of Athletic and Kinesio taping among both genders vol.14, pp.2, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11332-018-0453-2
  3. Effects of Kinesio® Taping on Dynamic Balance Following Fatigue: a Randomized Controlled Trial vol.20, pp.1, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1298/ptr.e9887
  4. Effect of Kinesio Taping on the Walking Ability of Patients with Foot Drop after Stroke vol.2019, pp.None, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/2459852
  5. The Effectiveness of Kinesio Taping in Recovering From Delayed Onset Muscle Soreness: A Crossover Study vol.29, pp.4, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1123/jsr.2018-0389
  6. The Effectiveness of Kinesio Taping in Recovering From Delayed Onset Muscle Soreness: A Crossover Study vol.29, pp.4, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1123/jsr.2018-0389
  7. Acute Effect of Ankle Kinesio and Athletic Taping on Ankle Range of Motion During Various Agility Tests in Athletes With Chronic Ankle Sprain vol.29, pp.5, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1123/jsr.2018-0398
  8. Acute Effect of Ankle Kinesio and Athletic Taping on Ankle Range of Motion During Various Agility Tests in Athletes With Chronic Ankle Sprain vol.29, pp.5, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1123/jsr.2018-0398
  9. Kinesio taping does not improve ankle functional or performance in people with or without ankle injuries: Systematic review and meta-analysis vol.35, pp.2, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1177/0269215520963846