Structural Engineering and Mechanics

Techno-Press (테크노프레스)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Multimode pushover analysis based on energy-equivalent SDOF systems

  • Manoukas, Grigorios E. (Department of Civil Engineering, Aristotle University, University Campus) ;
  • Athanatopoulou, Asimina M. (Department of Civil Engineering, Aristotle University, University Campus) ;
  • Avramidis, Ioannis E. (Department of Civil Engineering, Aristotle University, University Campus)
  • Received : 2012.07.27
  • Accepted : 2014.03.20
  • Published : 2014.08.25
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

In this paper the extension of a recently established energy-based pushover procedure in order to include the higher mode contributions to the seismic response of structures is presented and preliminary evaluated. The steps of the proposed methodology in its new formulation are quite similar to those of the well-known Modal Pushover Analysis. However, the determination of the properties of the 'modal' equivalent single-degree-of-freedom systems is achieved by a rationally founded energy-based concept. Firstly, the theoretical background and the assumptions of the proposed methodology are presented and briefly discussed. Secondly, the sequence of steps to be followed for its implementation along with the necessary equations is systematically presented. The accuracy of the methodology is evaluated by an extensive parametric study which shows that, in general, it provides better results compared to those produced by other similar procedures. In addition, the main shortcoming of the initial version of the methodology now seems to be mitigated to a large extent.

Keywords

References

  1. American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) (2008), Seismic Rehabilitation of Existing Buildings, ASCE/SEI 41-06 Standard, USA.
  2. Antoniou, S. and Pinho, R. (2004), "Development and verification of a displacement-based adaptive pushover procedure" J. Earthq. Eng., 7(5), 643-661.
  3. Applied Technology Council (ATC) (1996), Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit of Concrete Buildings, Vol. 1, Report No. ATC-40, Redwood City, CA, USA.
  4. Avramidis, I.E. (2006), "Structural models in research and practice" Proceedings of the 15th Hellenic Conference on R/C structures, Alexandroupoli, Greece, October. (in Greek)
  5. Aydinoglou, N.M. (2003), "An incremental response spectrum analysis procedure based on inelastic spectral displacements for multi-mode seismic performance evaluation" Bull. Earthq. Eng., 1(1), 3-36. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024853326383
  6. Chopra, A.K. and Goel, R.K. (2001), A Modal Pushover Analysis Procedure to Estimating Seismic Demands of Buildings: Theory and Preliminary Evaluation, PEER Report 2001/03, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley, USA.
  7. European Committee for Standardization (2004), Eurocode 8: Design of Structures for Earthquake Resistance, Part 3: Assessment and retrofitting of buildings, European standard prEN 1998-3, Brussels, EU.
  8. Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Applied Technology Council (ATC) (2004), Improvement of Nonlinear Static Seismic Analysis Procedures, Report No. ATC-55 (FEMA 440), USA.
  9. Fujii, K. (2007), "Prediction of seismic response of multi-story unsymmetric frame buildings" Proceedings of the 8th Pacific Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Singapore, December.
  10. Goel, R.K. and Chopra, A.K. (2004), "Evaluation of modal and FEMA pushover analyses: SAC buildings" Earthq. Spectra, 20(6), 225-254. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.1646390
  11. Hashemi, M.J. and Mofid, M. (2010), "Evaluation of energy-based modal pushover analysis in reinforced concrete frames with elevation irregularity" Scientia Iranica, Tran. A: Civil Eng., 17(2), 96-106.
  12. Hernadez-Montes, E., Kwon, O.S. and Aschheim, M.A. (2004), "An energy-based formulation for first- and multiple-mode nonlinear static (pushover) analysis" J. Earthq. Eng., 8(1), 69-88.
  13. Jan, T.S., Liu, M.W. and Kao, Y.C. (2004), "An Upper-bound pushover analysis procedure for estimating the seismic demands of high-rise buildings" Eng. Struct., 26(1), 117-128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2003.09.003
  14. Jiang, Y., Li, G. and Yang, D. (2010), "A modified approach of energy balanced concept based multimode pushover analysis to estimate seismic demands for buildings" Eng. Struct., 32, 1272-1283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2010.01.003
  15. Kalkan, E. and Kunnath S.K. (2006), "Adaptive modal combination procedure for nonlinear static aanalysis of building structures" J. Struct. Eng., 132(11), 1721-1731. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2006)132:11(1721)
  16. Kotanidis, C. and Doudoumis I.N. (2008), "Energy-based approach of Static Pushover Analysis" Proceedings of the 14th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Beijing, China, October.
  17. Krawinkler, H. and Seneviratna, G.D.P.K. (1998), "Prons and cons of a pushover analysis of seismic performance evaluation" Eng. Struct., 20, 452-464. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-0296(97)00092-8
  18. Leelataviwat, S., Saewon, W. and Goel S.C. (2008), "An energy based method for seismic evaluation of structures" Proceedings of the 14th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Beijing, China, October.
  19. Lin, J.L. and Tsai, K.C. (2007), "Simplified seismic analysis of asymmetric building systems" Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 36, 459-479. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.635
  20. Manoukas, G., Athanatopoulou, A. and Avramidis, I. (2006), "Comparative evaluation of static pushover analysis" variations according to modern codes" Proceedings of the 15th Hellenic Conference on R/C Structures, Alexandroupoli, Greece, October. (in Greek)
  21. Manoukas, G., Athanatopoulou, A. and Avramidis, I. (2011), "Static pushover analysis based on an energyequivalent SDOF system" Earthq. Spectra, 27(1), 89-105. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.3535597
  22. Moghadam, A.S. (2002), "A pushover procedure for tall buildings" Proceedings of the 12th European Conference on Earthquake Engineering, London, UK.
  23. Oliveto, G., Calio, I. and Marleta, M. (2001), Seismic Resistance and Vulnerability of Reinforced Concrete Buildings not Designed for Earthquake Action, Innovative Approaches to Earthquake Engineering, WIT Press, UK.
  24. Parducci, A., Comodini, F., Lucarelli, M., Mezzi, M. and Tomassoli, E. (2006), "Energy-based non linear static analysis" Proceedings of the 1st European Conference on Earthquake Engineering and Seismology, Geneva, Switzerland.
  25. Requena, M. and Ayala G.A. (2000), "Evaluation of a simplified method for the determination of the nonlinear seismic response of RC frames" Proceedings of the 12th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Auckland, New Zealand.
  26. Reyes, J.C. and Chopra, A.K. (2011), "Three-dimensional modal pushover analysis of buildings subjected to two components of ground motion, including its evaluation for tall buildings" Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 40, 789-806. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.1060

Cited by

  1. Time-domain multi-state markov model for engine system reliability analysis vol.3, pp.3, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1299/mej.16-00084
  2. Parametric study on energy demands for steel special concentrically braced frames vol.24, pp.2, 2014, https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2017.24.2.265
  3. A new practical equivalent linear model for estimating seismic hysteretic energy demand of bilinear systems vol.70, pp.3, 2014, https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2019.70.3.289