Science of Emotion and Sensibility (감성과학)

Korean Society for Emotion and Sensibility (한국감성과학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Exploring Conventional Models of Purchase Intention: Consumer Attitudes Towards Smartphones Advertisement

  • Received : 2013.10.18
  • Accepted : 2014.05.14
  • Published : 2014.06.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Mobile phone makers compete for market shares through domination in media advertisements. These include domination of advertisements (Ads) in TV and the internet. However, the abundance and complexity of the competitions of Ads in TV does not guarantee advertising success which can influence consumers' emotion and the purchase intention towards the brand. This research analyses the case of a directional model on Attitude-towards-the-Ad model as a baseline into a new proposed correlation models (MacKenzie, Scott, &Lutz, 1989). The survey targets the involvements of Asian smartphone owners' attitude on advertisements, brands and purchase intentions. CFA (Confirmatory factor Analysis) was used in the research experiments, including hypothesis testing, the outcome of model fit which revealed significant levels and were successful. The study revealed that all three paths have consistently high coefficient paths (Attitude to Ads - Attitude to Brands - Purchase Intention), showing significant value of (${\beta}$=>.80), which supported each correlation factors. Therefore, this structural model, could set standards for creative managers and advertising teams to improve the brands visibility and build strong influences on attitudes in advertisements and improve purchase intentions.

Keywords

References

  1. Advertising Trends for 2012. (2012, January 6). Retrieved from Ai Insite - The Art Institute Insite: http://insite.artinstitutes.edu/advertising-trends-for-2012-67009.aspx
  2. APPLE. (2013, March 11). Apple - iPhone 5 - TV Ad - Brilliant. Retrieved 11 23, 2012, from Apple Youtube Channel: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nvKyYeJJYwM
  3. Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 74-94.
  4. BERNAMA. (2013, January 5). The Star Online, News, Nation. Retrieved February 20, 2013, from The Star: http://thestar.com.my/news/story.asp?file=/2013/1/5/nation/20130105204554&sec=nation
  5. Chattopadhyay, A., & Basu, K. (1990). Humor in advertising: the moderating role of prior brand evaluation,. Journal of Marketing Research.
  6. Compeau, L. D., Grewal, D., & Monroe, K. B. (1998). Role of prior affect and sensory cues on consumers affective and cognitive responses and overall perceptions of quality. y. Journal of Business Research, 42, 295-308. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0148-2963(97)00126-4
  7. De Pelsmacker, P. D. (1998). Advertising characteristics and the attitude towards the ad - a study of 100 likeable TV commercials. Marketing and Research Today, pp. 166-179. , 27(4).
  8. De Pelsmacker, P., & Geuens, M. (1996). The communication effects of warmth, eroticism and humour in alcohol advertisements. Journal of Marketing Communications, 2(4), 247-262. https://doi.org/10.1080/135272696346088
  9. Fishbein, M. (1963). An investigation of the relationships between beliefs about an object and the attitude toward the object. Human Relations, 233-240.
  10. Fishbein, M., & Azjen, I. (1974). Attitudes towards objects as predictors of single and multiple behavioral criteria. Psychological Review, 59-74.
  11. Fishbein, M., M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research.
  12. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research 18, 39-50. https://doi.org/10.2307/3151312
  13. Gaskin, J. (2012, 12 3). Stats tools package. Provo, Utah.
  14. George , D., & Mallery, P. (2006). SPSS for Windows step by step. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
  15. Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (2009). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1-55. 6:1, 1-55.
  16. Hu, L.-T., & Bentler, , P. M. (1998). Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: Sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecification. Psychological Methods, Vol 3(4), 424-453. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.3.4.424
  17. Huang, J., So, S., & Liu, X. (2012). Attitude Toward the Viral Ad: Expanding Traditional Advertising Models to Interactive Advertising. Journal of Interactive Marketing 27, 36-46.
  18. Hwang, J., & Hyun, S. S. (2011). The Antecedents and Consequences of Brand Prestige in Luxury Restaurants. Asia Pacific Journal of Tourism Research.
  19. Janssens, W., & De Pelsmacker, P. (2005). Advertising for New and Existing Brands: The Impact of Media Context and Type of Advertisement. Journal of Marketing Communications.
  20. LG Mobile. (2012, September 30). LG Optimus G 옵티머스 G 광고 First LTE smartphone with Qualcomm, Snapdragon S4 Pro Quad Core, Optimus G brings dynamic performance in style. Retrieved from Youtube LG Mobile: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GGnkL7M18rI
  21. Lutz. (1985). Affective and Cognitive Antecedents of Attitude toward the Ad: A Conceptual Framework. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associate.
  22. Lutz, R. J., MacKenzie, S. B., & Belch, G. J. (1983). Attitude toward the ad as a mediator of advertising effectiveness: Determinants and consequences. Advances in Consumer Research 10, 532-539.
  23. MacKenzie, Scott, B., & Lutz, R. J. (1989). An empirical examination of the structural antecedents of attitude toward the ad in an advertising pretesting. Journal of Marketing, 53, 48-65. https://doi.org/10.2307/1251413
  24. Nokia. (2012, November 26). Work on the go with the Nokia Lumia 920 and Microsoft Office. Retrieved from Nokia Brand Channel: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vREZxmTODWI
  25. Nunnally, J. (1978). Psychometric Theory,. New York:: McGraw-Hill.
  26. Ohanian, R. (1990). Construction and validation of a scale to measure celebrity endorsers' perceived expertise, trustworthiness, and attractiveness. Journal of Advertising, 19(no. 3), 39-52. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.1990.10673191
  27. Peter, J. P. (1981). Construct validity: A review of basic issues and marketing practices. Journal of Marketing Research.
  28. Pornpitakpan, C. (2003). The effect of celebrity endorsers' perceived credibility on product purchase intention: The case of Singaporeans. Journal of International Consumer Marketing. 16(2:), 55-74.
  29. Pyun, D. Y., Kwon, H. H., Chon, T. J., & Han, J. W. (2012). How does advertising through sport work? Evidence from college students in Singapore. European Sport Management Quarterly, 43-63.
  30. Rosenberg, M. J., & Hovland, C. I. (1960). Cognitive, affective, and behavioral components of attitudes. New Haven: Yale University Press.
  31. Samsung Mobile. (2012, June 11). [GALAXY S III] Official TV Commercial - 30-second version. Retrieved from Official global channel of Samsung Mobile: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qGfV6uh3kTs
  32. Swaminathan, V. (1996). The evolution and antecedents of transformational advertising: a conceptual model, Advances in Consumer Research. 49-55.
  33. Unnava, H. R., & Sirdeshmukh, D. (1994). Reducing Competitive Ad Interference. Journal of Marketing Research Vol. 31, 403-411. https://doi.org/10.2307/3152227
  34. Weinberger, M. G., & Gulas, C. S. (1992). The impact of humor in advertising-a review,. Journal of Advertising(18), 35.