DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Magnesium vs. machined surfaced titanium - osteoblast and osteoclast differentiation

  • Kwon, Yong-Dae (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Kyung Hee University) ;
  • Lee, Deok-Won (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Kyung Hee University) ;
  • Hong, Sung-Ok (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Kyung Hee University)
  • Received : 2013.06.17
  • Accepted : 2014.03.10
  • Published : 2014.06.30

Abstract

PURPOSE. This study focused on in vitro cell differentiation and surface characteristics in a magnesium coated titanium surface implanted on using a plasma ion source. MATERIALS AND METHODS. 40 commercially made pure titanium discs were prepared to produce Ti oxide machined surface (M) and Mg-incorporated Ti oxide machined surface (MM). Surface properties were analyzed using a scanning electron microscopy (SEM). On each surface, alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity, alizarin red S staining for mineralization of MC3T3-E1 cells, and quantitative analysis of osteoblastic gene expression, were evaluated. Actin ring formation assay and gene expression analysis of TRAP and GAPDH performing RT-PCR were performed to characterize osteoclast differentiation on mouse bone marrow-derived macrophages (BMMs). RESULTS. MM showed similar surface morphology and surface roughness with M, but was slightly smoother after ion implantation at the micron scale. M was more hydrophobic than MM. No significant difference between surfaces on ALP activity at 7 and 14 days were observed. Real-time PCR analyses showed similar levels of mRNA expression of the osteoblast phenotype genes; osteopontin (OPN), osteocalcin (OCN), bone sialoprotein (BSP), and collagen 1 (Col 1) in cell grown on MM at 7, 14 and 21 days. Alizarin red S staining at 21 days showed no significant difference. BMMs differentiation increased in M and MM. Actin ring formation assay and gene expression analysis of TRAP showed osteoclast differentiation to be more active on MM. CONCLUSION. Both M and MM have a good effect on osteoblastic cell differentiation, but MM may speed the bone remodeling process by activating on osteoclast differentiation.

Keywords

References

  1. Sul YT, Johansson C, Albrektsson T. Which surface properties enhance bone response to implants? Comparison of oxidized magnesium, TiUnite, and Osseotite implant surfaces. Int J Prosthodont 2006;19:319-28.
  2. Zreiqat H, Howlett CR, Zannettino A, Evans P, Schulze- Tanzil G, Knabe C, Shakibaei M. Mechanisms of magnesium- stimulated adhesion of osteoblastic cells to commonly used orthopaedic implants. J Biomed Mater Res 2002;62:175-84. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.10270
  3. Sul YT, Johansson P, Chang BS, Byon ES, Jeong Y. Bone tissue responses to Mg-incorporated oxidized implants and machine- turned implantsin the rabbit femur. J Appl Biomater Biomech 2005;3:18-28.
  4. Sul YT, Johansson CB, Kang Y, Jeon DG, Albrektsson T. Bone reactions to oxidized titanium implants with electrochemical anion sulphuric acid and phosphoric acid incorporation. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2002;4:78-87. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8208.2002.tb00156.x
  5. Maitz MF, Poon RW, Liu XY, Pham MT, Chu PK. Bioactivity of titanium following sodium plasma immersion ion implantation and deposition. Biomaterials 2005;26:5465-73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.02.006
  6. Sul YT, Johansson C, Byon E, Albrektsson T. The bone response of oxidized bioactive and non-bioactive titanium implants. Biomaterials 2005;26:6720-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.04.058
  7. Cho LR, Kim DG, Kim JH, Byon ES, Jeong YS, Park CJ. Bone response of Mg ion-implanted clinical implants with the plasma source ion implantation method. Clin Oral Implants Res 2010;21:848-56.
  8. Sammons RL, Lumbikanonda N, Gross M, Cantzler P. Comparison of osteoblast spreading on microstructured dental implant surfaces and cell behaviour in an explant model of osseointegration. A scanning electron microscopic study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2005;16:657-66. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2005.01168.x
  9. Park JW, Kim YJ, Jang JH, Song H. Osteoblast response to magnesium ion-incorporated nanoporous titanium oxide surfaces. Clin Oral Implants Res 2010;21:1278-87. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.01944.x
  10. Takebe J, Itoh S, Okada J, Ishibashi K. Anodic oxidation and hydrothermal treatment of titanium results in a surface that causes increased attachment and altered cytoskeletal morphology of rat bone marrow stromal cells in vitro. J Biomed Mater Res 2000;51:398-407. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-4636(20000905)51:3<398::AID-JBM14>3.0.CO;2-#
  11. Samee N, Geoffroy V, Marty C, Schiltz C, Vieux-Rochas M, Levi G, de Vernejoul MC. Dlx5, a positive regulator of osteoblastogenesis, is essential for osteoblast-osteoclast coupling. Am J Pathol 2008;173:773-80. https://doi.org/10.2353/ajpath.2008.080243
  12. Tadic T, Dodig M, Erceg I, Marijanovic I, Mina M, Kalajzic Z, Velonis D, Kronenberg MS, Kosher RA, Ferrari D, Lichtler AC. Overexpression of Dlx5 in chicken calvarial cells accelerates osteoblastic differentiation. J Bone Miner Res 2002;17:1008-14. https://doi.org/10.1359/jbmr.2002.17.6.1008
  13. Ajroud K, Sugimori T, Goldmann WH, Fathallah DM, Xiong JP, Arnaout MA. Binding Affinity of Metal Ions to the CD11b A-domain Is Regulated by Integrin Activation and Ligands. J Biol Chem 2004;279:25483-8. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M402901200
  14. Zreiqat H, Valenzuela SM, Nissan BB, Roest R, Knabe C, Radlanski RJ, Renz H, Evans PJ. The effect of surface chemistry modification of titanium alloy on signalling pathways in human osteoblasts. Biomaterials 2005;26:7579-86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.05.024
  15. Olivares-Navarrete R, Raz P, Zhao G, Chen J, Wieland M, Cochran DL, Chaudhri RA, Ornoy A, Boyan BD, Schwartz Z. Integrin alpha2beta1 plays a critical role in osteoblast response to micron-scale surface structure and surface energy of titanium substrates. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2008;105: 15767-72. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0805420105
  16. Keselowsky BG, Wang L, Schwartz Z, Garcia AJ, Boyan BD. Integrin alpha(5) controls osteoblastic proliferation and differentiation responses to titanium substrates presenting different roughness characteristics in a roughness independent manner. J Biomed Mater Res A 2007;80:700-10.
  17. Wilson SR, Peters C, Saftig P, Bromme D. Cathepsin K activity- dependent regulation of osteoclast actin ring formation and bone resorption. J Biol Chem 2009;284:2584-92. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M805280200
  18. Flanagan AM, Massey HM, Wilson C, Vellodi A, Horton MA, Steward CG. Macrophage colony-stimulating factor and receptor activator NF-kappaB ligand fail to rescue osteoclastpoor human malignant infantile osteopetrosis in vitro. Bone 2002;30:85-90. https://doi.org/10.1016/S8756-3282(01)00656-1
  19. Boyle WJ, Simonet WS, Lacey DL. Osteoclast differentiation and activation. Nature 2003;423:337-42. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature01658
  20. Burgess TL, Qian Y, Kaufman S, Ring BD, Van G, Capparelli C, Kelley M, Hsu H, Boyle WJ, Dunstan CR, Hu S, Lacey DL. The ligand for osteoprotegerin (OPGL) directly activates mature osteoclasts. J Cell Biol 19993;145:527-38. https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.145.3.527

Cited by

  1. Effects of magnesium coating on bone-implant interfaces with and without polyether-ether-ketone particle interference: A rabbit model based on porous Ti6Al4V implants pp.15524973, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.b.34332
  2. Behavior of mammalian cells on magnesium substituted bare and hydroxyapatite deposited (Ti,Mg)N coatings vol.32, pp.6, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nbt.2014.11.006
  3. Effect of Magnesium and Osteoblast Cell Presence on Hydroxyapatite Formation on (Ti,Mg)N Thin Film Coatings vol.69, pp.7, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-016-2029-4
  4. Biomimetic hydroxyapatite/collagen composite drives bone niche recapitulation in a rabbit orthotopic model vol.2, pp.None, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtbio.2019.100005
  5. Effect of Magnesium on Dentinogenesis of Human Dental Pulp Cells vol.2021, pp.None, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/6567455