DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

족관절 골절 치료에 사용한 금속 내고정물 제거 수술 시 시행한 균 배양 검사의 결과

Results of Culture Test at the Time of Removal of Metal Implants Used for Ankle Fracture Management

  • 정형진 (인제대학교 의과대학 상계백병원 정형외과학교실) ;
  • 배서영 (인제대학교 의과대학 상계백병원 정형외과학교실) ;
  • 유재하 (인제대학교 의과대학 상계백병원 정형외과학교실)
  • Chung, Hyung-Jin (Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Sanggye Paik Hospital, Inje University College of Medicine) ;
  • Bae, Su-Young (Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Sanggye Paik Hospital, Inje University College of Medicine) ;
  • Yu, Jae-Ha (Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Sanggye Paik Hospital, Inje University College of Medicine)
  • 투고 : 2014.03.29
  • 심사 : 2014.04.28
  • 발행 : 2014.06.15

초록

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to report the results of culture test at the time of removal of metal devices used for management of ankle fractures and for analysis of contributing factors. Materials and Methods: We reviewed medical records of 132 patients with lower tibia and ankle fracture who had their metal devices removed during the period from January 2010 to February 2014. Patients with clinical signs of infection were excluded. Culture test was performed by taking the granulation tissue around the metal device at the time of removal. We divided the subjects into two groups, culture positive and negative. We then performed a retrospective review of each medical record of multiple factors that might contribute to the culture results, including laboratory results, medical history, material and size of metal device, indwelling period, and whether or not it was open injury. Results: Among 132 cases, six were culture positive. Enterococcus was detected in two cases and the others were Staphylococcus. No significant difference in medical history of patients and laboratory results, including C-reactive protein level, was observed between the culture positive and negative group. Culture positive rate was 5.4% in titanium and 3.9% in stainless steel. In terms of metal size, culture positive rate was 5.1% in small plates, 6.7% in large plates, and culture negative in intramedullary nails. The average indwelling period of metal device was 61.5 weeks in the culture positive group, and 68.6 weeks in the negative group. Nine cases were open fractures and all were in the culture negative group. Conclusion: Whether or not the culture result was positive, there were no meaningful contributing factors. Presence of bacterium on the metal device could not be screened by any laboratory results or other factors.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Perren SM, Cordey J, Rahn BA, Gautier E, Schneider E. Early temporary porosis of bone induced by internal fixation implants. A reaction to necrosis, not to stress protection? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1988;(232):139-51.
  2. Vinh DC, Embil JM. Device-related infections: a review. J Long Term Eff Med Implants. 2005;15:467-88. https://doi.org/10.1615/JLongTermEffMedImplants.v15.i5.20
  3. Zalavras CG, Christensen T, Rigopoulos N, Holtom P, Patzakis MJ. Infection following operative treatment of ankle fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009;467:1715-20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-009-0743-8
  4. Sanderson PJ. Infection in orthopaedic implants. J Hosp Infect. 1991;18 Suppl A:367-75. https://doi.org/10.1016/0195-6701(91)90043-8
  5. Bostman O, Pihlajamäki H. Routine implant removal after fracture surgery: a potentially reducible consumer of hospital resources in trauma units. J Trauma. 1996;41:846-9. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005373-199611000-00013
  6. Rutkow IM. Orthopaedic operations in the United States, 1979 through 1983. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1986;68:716-9. https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-198668050-00011
  7. Sourlas L, Papadakis M, Lallos S, Brilakis E, Efstathopoulos N. Tibial shaft fracture after removal of an ACE tibial nail. J Long Term Eff Med Implants. 2011;21:193-6. https://doi.org/10.1615/JLongTermEffMedImplants.v21.i3.20
  8. Beaupre GS, Csongradi JJ. Refracture risk after plate removal in the forearm. J Orthop Trauma. 1996;10:87-92. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005131-199602000-00003
  9. Sanderson PL, Ryan W, Turner PG. Complications of metalwork removal. Injury. 1992;23:29-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-1383(92)90121-8
  10. Minkowitz RB, Bhadsavle S, Walsh M, Egol KA. Removal of painful orthopaedic implants after fracture union. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89:1906-12. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.F.01536
  11. Keel SB, Jaffe KA, Petur Nielsen G, Rosenberg AE. Orthopaedic implant-related sarcoma: a study of twelve cases. Mod Pathol. 2001;14:969-77. https://doi.org/10.1038/modpathol.3880420
  12. Wang S, Shi X. Molecular mechanisms of metal toxicity and carcinogenesis. Mol Cell Biochem. 2001;222:3-9. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1017918013293
  13. Gristina AG, Naylor PT, Myrvik QN. Mechanisms of musculoskeletal sepsis. Orthop Clin North Am. 1991;22:363-71.
  14. Gristina AG, Naylor PT, Webb LX. Molecular mechanisms in musculoskeletal sepsis: the race for the surface. Instr Course Lect. 1990;39:471-82.
  15. Wagner C, Aytac S, Hänsch GM. Biofilm growth on implants: bacteria prefer plasma coats. Int J Artif Organs. 2011;34:811-7. https://doi.org/10.5301/ijao.5000061
  16. Schaer TP, Stewart S, Hsu BB, Klibanov AM. Hydrophobic polycationic coatings that inhibit biofilms and support bone healing during infection. Biomaterials. 2012;33:1245-54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.10.038
  17. Moussa FW, Anglen JO, Gehrke JC, Christensen G, Simpson WA. The significance of positive cultures from orthopedic fixation devices in the absence of clinical infection. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 1997;26:617-20.
  18. Levy PY, Ollivier M, Drancourt M, Raoult D, Argenson JN. Relation between nasal carriage of Staphylococcus aureus and surgical site infection in orthopedic surgery: the role of nasal contamination. A systematic literature review and meta-analysis. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2013;99:645-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2013.03.030
  19. Williams DF. Titanium: epitome of biocompatibility or cause for concern. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1994;76:348-9.