Journal of the Korean Society for information Management (정보관리학회지)

Korean Society for Information Management (한국정보관리학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on the Quality of Academic Information Service of Internet Portal

인터넷 포털 학술정보서비스 품질에 관한 연구

  • 김성희 (중앙대학교 사회과학대학 문헌정보학과) ;
  • 박해진 (중앙대학교 대학원)
  • Received : 2014.05.20
  • Accepted : 2014.06.20
  • Published : 2014.06.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study was to evaluate the quality of academic information services provided by Naver Academic Information Service, Google Scholar, and MS Academic Search. This academic information services were evaluated in terms of the contents, service, and effectiveness. 135 four year college students were recruited for the survey. The results showed that the Google Scholar in contents section had higher score than Naver and MS Academic Search. In regard to service, Google Scholar had higher score in retrieval section while Naver had higher score in design section respectively. Finally, both Google Scholar and Naver in the access section had higher score than MS Academic Search.

본 연구는 네이버 전문정보, 구글 스칼라, 그리고 MS Academic Search에서 제공하는 학술정보서비스에 대한 특성을 살펴보고 135명의 대학생을 대상으로 그 이용 및 품질에 대해 콘텐츠, 서비스 및 효과성을 중심으로 비교 평가 하였다. 분석결과 콘텐츠 부분에서는 구글 스칼라에 대한 이용자 평가가 높게 나타났고, 검색성의 경우 구글 스칼라가, 디자인 부분에서는 네이버 전문정보가 상대적으로 높게 평가되었다. 접근성에 있어서는 네이버 전문정보와 구글 스칼라가 MS Academic Search보다 높게 평가되었고, 정보의 유용성과 이용자 만족도에서는 구글 스칼라가 다른 포털 학술정보서비스보다 높게 평가되었다.

Keywords

References

  1. 구중억, 이응봉 (2009). Open API 기반 메타 검색시스템의 사용성 평가에 관한 연구. 정보관리학회지, 26(1), 185-214. http://dx.doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2009.26.1.185 (Gu, Jung-Eok, & Lee, Eung-Bong (2009). A Study on the Construction and Usability Test of Meta Search System Using Open API. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 26(1), 185-214. http://dx.doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2009.26.1.185)
  2. 김계수 (2002). 인터넷 포털 사이트의 서비스품질전략에 관한 연구. 경영학연구, 31(1), 191-209. (Kim, Gae-Su (2002). A Study Quality Strategy of the Portal Service In The Digital Management Era. Journal of the Korean Academic Society of Business Administration, 31(1), 191-209.)
  3. 김선애 (2006). KOLIS-NET 종합목록 DB의 품질평가. 한국문헌정보학회지, 40(1), 95-117. http://dx.doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2006.40.1.095 (Kim, Sun-Ae (2006). Quality Evaluation of a Shared Cataloging DB: the Case of KOLIS-NET. Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 40(1), 95-117. http://dx.doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2006.40.1.095)
  4. 김정환, 김재훈, 황재영 (2011). 디지털환경에서 학술연구자들의 정보요구 및 이용행태에 관한 연구. 한국도서관․정보학회지, 42(3), 189-208. (Kim, Jeong-Hwan, Kim, Jayhoon, & Hwang, Jae-Young (2011). A Study on Information Users' Needs and Information Seeking Behavior of Doctoral Researchers in Digital Age. Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 42(3), 189-208.)
  5. 김진영 (2012). 대학생의 포털 학술정보서비스 이용현황 및 개선방안에 관한 연구. 석사학위논문, 이화여자대학교. (Kim, Jin-Young (2012). A Study on the Realities for University Students to Make Use of Portal Sites' Academic Information, Services and its improvement. Master's Thesis, Ewha Womans University.)
  6. 박미영, 승현우 (2005). 데이터베이스 품질 평가를 위한 품질 특성 정의 및 선정. 정보기술논문지, 5, 13-22. (Park, Mi-Young, & Seung, Hyun-Woo (2005). Definition and Selection of Database Quality Characteristics. Journal of Information Technology, 5, 13-22.)
  7. 박소연 (2009). 민간 포털의 책, 전문정보 서비스와 대학도서관 서비스. 한국문헌정보학회지, 43(3), 181-195. (Park, Soyeon (2009). Search Portals and Academic Libraries: An Analysis of the Book Services and Academic Information Services of Major Search Portals. Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 43(3), 181-195.) https://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2009.43.3.181
  8. 박소연 (2010). 주요 포털들의 멀티미디어 검색 서비스 비교 분석. 한국문헌정보학회지, 44(4), 395-412. (Park, Soyeon (2010). An Analysis of Multimedia Search Services Provided by Major Korean Search Portals. Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 44(4), 395-412.) https://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2010.44.4.395
  9. 박소연 (2011). 네이버와 구글의 모바일 통합 검색 컨텐츠 평가. 한국도서관․정보학회지, 42(4), 263-280. (Park, Soyeon (2011) Evaluation of Mobile Unified Search Contents of Naver and Google Korea. Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 42(4), 263-280.) https://doi.org/10.16981/kliss.42.4.201112.263
  10. 박소연 (2012). 검색 포털들의 모바일 검색 기능 분석. 정보관리학회지, 29(1), 175-190. http://dx.doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2012.29.1.175 (Park, Soyeon (2012). Analysis of Mobile Search Functions of Korean Search Portals. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 29(1), 175-190. http://dx.doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2012.29.1.175)
  11. 설진아 (2011). 대학생집단의 인터넷 포털 사이트에 대한 수용자 평가 연구. 언론과학연구, 11(1), 157-186. (Seol, Jin-Ah (2011). A Comparative Study of Internet Search Engines. Journal of Communication Science, 11(1), 157-186.)
  12. 양지안, 남영준 (2010). 디지털도서관 환경에서 메타서치시스템과 구글 스칼라에 관한 비교 연구. 제17회 한국정보관리학회 학술대회 논문집, 45-54. (Yang, Ji-Ann, & Nam, Young-Joon (2010). A Comparative Study on Metasearch System and Google Scholar in the Digital Library Environment. Proceedings of the Korea Society of Management Information, 45-54.)
  13. 양창진 (2011). 포털 학술정보서비스의 사전과 학술정보 연계 검색 방안 연구. 정보관리학회지, 28(1), 7-22. http://dx.doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2011.28.1.007 (Yang, Chang-Jin (2011). A Study on Service Integration of Research Information and Dictionary in Portal Site. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 28(1), 7-22. http://dx.doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2011.28.1.007)
  14. 이응봉, 조현양, 류범종, 최재황 (2001). 과학기술분야 데이터베이스의 품질향상을 위한 품질평가 연구. 한국문헌정보학회지, 35(2), 109-132. (Lee, Eung-Bong, Cho, Hyun-Yang, You, Beom-Jong, & Choi, Jae-Hwang (2001). A Study of the Quality Evaluation for Improving the Database Quality in Scientific and Technical Fields. Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 35(2), 109-132.)
  15. 이지연, 박성재 (2005). 검색 포털 시스템의 동향과 발전방향. 정보관리연구, 36(4), 71-89. http://dx.doi.org/10.1633/JIM.2005.36.4.071 (Lee, Jee-Yeon, & Park, Sung-Jae (2005). A Survey of Portal Sites in Terms of Academic Information Retrieval. Journal of information management, 36(4), 71-89. http://dx.doi.org/10.1633/JIM.2005.36.4.071)
  16. 최호남 (2011). 디지털도서관의 어노테이션 시스템에 관한 연구. 박사학위논문, 충남대학교. (Choi, Ho-Nam (2011). Study on the Digital Library Annotation System. Ph.D Dissertation, ChungNam National University.)
  17. 한국데이터베이스진흥센터 (2000). 데이터베이스 품질평가 항목. 서울: 한국데이터베이스진흥센터. (Korea DB Agency (2000). The Standardization of the Quality Evaluation item on Database. Seoul: Korea Database Agency.)
  18. 홍현진 (2005). 웹 기반 데이터베이스의 품질평가 기준 개발에 관한 연구. 한국문헌정보학회지, 39(2), 211-235. http://dx.doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2005.39.2.211 (Hong, Hyun-Jin (2005). A Study on the Development of the Quality Evaluation Standard of Web-Based Databases. Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 39(2), 211-235. http://dx.doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2005.39.2.211)
  19. Caywood, C. (1996). Library selection criteria for WWW resources. (2014, June 10). Retrieved from http://www.keele.org.uk/lt/Internet/criteria.htm/
  20. Chen, Q., & Wells, W. (1999). Attitude toward the Site. Journal of Advertising Research, 39(5), 27-37.
  21. Clarke, III I., & Flaherty, T. B. (2003). Web-Based B2B Portals. Industrial Marketing Management, 32(1), 15-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0019-8501(01)00199-7
  22. Edwards, J. (1998). The Good, the Bad and the Useless: Evaluating internet resources, Ariadne (July). (2014, June 09). Retrieved from http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue16/digital
  23. Hamilton, S., & Chervany, N. L. (1981). Evaluating Information System Effectiveness - Part I:Comparing Evaluation Approaches. MIS Quarterly, 5(3), 55-69. https://doi.org/10.2307/249291
  24. Hargittai, E. (2000). Open Portals or Closed Gates? Channeling Content on the World Wide Web. Poetics, 27(4), 233-254. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-422X(00)00006-1
  25. Hightower, C., & Caldwel, C. (2010). Shifting sands: Science researchers on Google scholar, Web of science and Pubmed. with implications for library collectinons budgets. Issues in science and technologt Librarianship, 63, 1-17.
  26. Neuhaus, C., Neuhaus, E., & Asher, A. (2008). Google scholar goes to school: the presence of Google Scholar on college and university web sites. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 34(1), 39-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2007.11.009
  27. Nielsen, J. (1993). Usability engineering. SanFrancisco, Calif: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers.
  28. Rai, A., Lang, S. S., & Welker, R. B. (2002). Assessing the Validity of IS Success Models: An Empirical Test and Theoretical Analysis. Information Systems Research, 13(1), 50-69. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.13.1.50.96
  29. Robinson, M. L., & Wusteman, J. (2007). Putting Google Scholar to the test: a preliminary study. Electronoic library and information systems, 41(1), 71-80. https://doi.org/10.1108/00330330710724908
  30. Testa, E. (1998). ISI web select: developing web site selection criteria. (2014, June 09). Retrieved from http://wokinfo.com/essays/journal-selection-process/
  31. Walters, W. H. (2011). Comparative recall and precision. Libraries and the Academy, 11(4), 971-1006. https://doi.org/10.1353/pla.2011.0042