Journal of the Korean Society for information Management (정보관리학회지)

Korean Society for Information Management (한국정보관리학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Schema Class Inheritance Model for Research Data Management and Search

연구데이터 관리 및 검색을 위한 스키마 클래스 상속 모델

  • 김선태 (한국과학기술정보연구원 과학기술빅데이터연구실)
  • Received : 2014.05.17
  • Accepted : 2014.06.20
  • Published : 2014.06.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The necessity of the raw data management and reuse is issued by diffusion of the recognition that research data is a national asset. In this paper, a metadata design model by schema class inheritance and a metadata integrated search model by schema objects are suggested for a structural management of the data. A data architecture in which an schema object has an 1 : 1 relation to the data collection was designed. A suggested model was testified by creation of a virtual schema class and objects which inherit the schema class. It showed the possibility of implement systematically. A suggested model can be used to manage the data which are produced by government agencies because schema inheritance and integrated search model present way to overcome the weak points of the 'Top-dow Hierarchy model' which is being used to design the metadata schema.

최근 연구데이터가 국가자산이라는 인식의 확산으로 원시데이터 관리 및 재사용의 필요성이 이슈이다. 본 연구에서는 데이터의 체계적인 관리를 위해, 스키마 클래스를 상속하는 방식의 메타데이터 설계 모델과 상속을 통해 생성된 스키마 객체들을 대상으로 메타데이터 통합 검색 모델을 제안하였다. 스키마 클래스를 상속한 스키마 객체가 데이터 컬렉션에 1대1의 관계를 갖도록 데이터 아키텍처를 설계하였으며, 제안된 모델의 검증을 위해서 가상 스키마 클래스 및 객체가 시스템적으로 구현 가능함을 증명하였다. 본 연구에서 제안하는 스키마 클래스 상속 및 통합검색 모델은 일반적으로 사용되는 '하향식 계층 모델'의 단점을 극복하는 모델로서, 정부 기관에서 생산되는 데이터를 독립적으로 관리하는데 활용될 수 있다고 사료된다.

Keywords

References

  1. 김선태, 이태영 (2011). 연구데이터와 관련된 OpenURL의 학술서비스 유형 메타태그의 확장에 대한 연구. 정보관리연구, 42(4), 39-58. http://dx.doi.org/10.1633/JIM.2011.42.4.039 (Kim, Suntae, & Lee, Taeuyoung (2011). A Study on the expansion of Meta-Tag for Research Data in Scholarly Service Type of OpenURL. Journal of Information Management, 42(4), 39-58. http://dx.doi.org/10.1633/JIM.2011.42.4.039)
  2. 김선태 (2012). 관측분야 과학데이터기록의 검색과 발견을 위한 메타데이터 표준요소 선정에 관한 연구. 박사학위논문, 전북대학교 대학원, 문헌정보학과. (Kim, Suntae (2012). A Study on Standardized Metadata Elements to search and discover observation scientific data. Unpulished doctoral dissertation, University of Chonbuk. Jeonju, Korea.)
  3. 안부영, 조희형, 안성수, 박형선 (2005). 생물다양성 데이터교환을 위한 메타데이터 스키마 설계. 한국정보과학회 2005 가을 학술발표논문집, 32(2), 91-93. (Ahn, B., Cho, H., Ahn, S., & Park, H. (2005). Design of Metadata Schema for Biodiversity Data Exchange. The Korean Institute of Information Scientists and Engineers, Conference.)
  4. 이상태 (2006). 과학기술 데이터세트 메타데이터 표준. STISC 과학기술정보표준화위원회.
  5. 이혜영, 곽승진 (2007). 지구 관측자료 공유를 위한 메타데이터 연구. 한국문헌정보학회지, 41(2), 257-276. http://dx.doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2007.41.2.257 (Lee, H., & Kwak, S. (2007). A Study on Metadata for Sharing the Information of Earth Observation. Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 41(2), 257-276. http://dx.doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2007.41.2.257)
  6. 한국과학기술정보연구원 (2011). 분야별 과학데이터 구축 및 활용 현황에 관한 연구. 대전: 한국과학기술정보연구원. (KISTI (2011). Current Status of Constructiong and Utilizing Scientific Data: Survey of 13 Subject Fields.)
  7. 한종엽, 최영준 (2004). 해양전문정보센터의 멀티미디어 메타데이터베이스 및 디지털도서관 통합정보시스템 구현에 관한 연구. 정보관리학회지, 21(4), 5-26. http://dx.doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2004.21.4.005 (Han, J., & Choi, Y. (2004). A Study on Planning & Implementation of the Multimedia Meta Database and Digital Library's Integrated Information System for the Oceanographic Information Center. Korea Society for Information Management, 21(4), 5-26. http://dx.doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2004.21.4.005)
  8. Abrams, S., Rizk-Jackson, A., Kochi, J., & Wittman, N. (2013). Sharing Data-Rich Research Through Repository Layering. OR 2013, PEI, Canada. Retrieved from http://or2013.net/sites/or2013.net/files/slides/OR-2013-Abrams-sharing-data-richresearch.ppt
  9. ACRL Research Planning and Review Committee (2012). 2012 top ten trends in academic libraries. College & Research Libraries News, 311-320. Retrieved from http://crln.acrl.org/content/73/6/311.full.pdf+html
  10. Cox, M. A., & Pinfield, S. (2013). Research data management and libraries: Current activities and future priorities. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, to be published. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0961000613492542
  11. Dietrich, D., Adamus, T., Miner, A., & Steinhart, G. (2012). De-Mystifying the Data Management Requirements of Research Funders. Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship, 70, summer. doi:10.5062/F44M92G2
  12. Green, T. (2009). We Need Publishing Standards for Datasets and Data Tables. OECD Publishing
  13. Jones, S. (2012). Curation policies and support services of the main UK research funders. Retrieved from http://www.dcc.ac.uk/sites/default/files/documents/RC%20policy%20overview%20v2.2.pdf
  14. Juan-le, W., Song-cai, Y., & Chuan-jie, X. (2005). Analysis and Design of Metadata Standard Structure for Geosciences Data Sharing. Institute of Geographical Sciences and Natural Resources, CAS, Beijing 100101, China. Retrieved from http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTOTAL-DLGT200501005.htm
  15. Kuipers, T., & Hoeven, J. V. D. (2009). Insight into digital preservation of research output in Europe.
  16. Mabe, M. (2009). An overview of scientific and scholarly journal publishing. The STM report.
  17. McGovern, N. (2013). Trust in Repositories: Building and Measuring Trustworthiness Using TRAC. Open Repositories 2013, Canada. Retrieved from http://or2013.net/sites/or2013.net/files/TrustInRepositories-McGovern_Mar2013_final.doc
  18. Michener, W. K., Allardb, S., Buddenc, A., Cookd, R. B., Douglassb, K., Framee, M., ..., & Vieglaisg, D. A. (2012). Participatory design of dataone-enabling cyberinfrastructure for the biological and environmental sciences. Ecological Infomatics, 11(September), 5-15. Retrieved from http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1574954111000768 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoinf.2011.08.007
  19. Phillips, S., & Koenig, J. (2008). DSpace Administration and Use. Texas Digital Library. Retrieved from http://www.tdl.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/04/DSpaceAdministrationAndUse.pdf
  20. PRC (2010). Access vs. importance. Retrieved from http://www.publishingresearch.net/documents/PRCAccessvsImportanceGlobalNov2010_000.pdf
  21. Science (2011). Challenges and Opportunities. Science, 331(6018), 692-693. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.331.6018.692
  22. Starr, J., Ashton, J., Barton, A., Elliott, J., Jacquemot-Perbal, M., Karjalainen, M., ..., & Ziedorn, F. (2013). DataCite Metadata Schema for the Publication and Citation of Research Data. Retrieved from http://schema.datacite.org/meta/kernel-3/doc/DataCite-MetadataKernel_v3.0.pdf
  23. Tenopir, C., Allard, S., Douglass, K., Aydinoglu, U. A., Wu, L., Read, E., Manoff, M., & Frame, M. (2011). Data Sharing by Scientists: Practices and Perceptions. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0021101
  24. Vempati, D. U., Chung, C., Mader, C., Koleti, A., Datar, N., Vidović, D., Wrobel, D., Erickson, S., Muhlich, L. J., Berriz, G., Benes, H. C., Subramanian, A., Pillal, A., Shamu, E. C., & Schürer, C. S. (2014). Metadata Standard and Data Exchange Specifications to Describe, Model, and Integrate Complex and Diverse High-Throughput Screening Data from the Library of Integrated Network-based Cellular Signatures (LINCS). Jorunal of Biomolecular Screening, February. doi: 10.1177/1087057114522514
  25. 위키백과 (2014, April). 힉스 보손. Retrieved from http://ko.wikipedia.org/wiki/%ED%9E%89%EC%8A%A4_%EB%B3%B4%EC%86%90
  26. Wikipedia (2014a March). E-research. Retrieved from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/E-research
  27. Wikipedia (2014b April). e-Science. Retrieved from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/E-Science