DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Monitoring Efficiency Evaluation of Camera Trapping in Terrestrial Mammals

카메라 트래핑을 이용한 육상포유류 모니터링 효율성 평가

  • Chung, Chul-Un (Species Restoration Technology Institute, Korea National Park Service) ;
  • Cha, Jin-Yeol (Korea National Park Service) ;
  • Kim, Young-Chae (Species Restoration Technology Institute, Korea National Park Service) ;
  • Kim, Sung-Chul (Species Restoration Technology Institute, Korea National Park Service) ;
  • Kwon, Gu-Hee (Species Restoration Technology Institute, Korea National Park Service) ;
  • Lee, Hwa-Jin (Species Restoration Technology Institute, Korea National Park Service)
  • 정철운 (국립공원관리공단 종복원기술원) ;
  • 차진열 (국립공원관리공단) ;
  • 김영채 (국립공원관리공단 종복원기술원) ;
  • 김성철 (국립공원관리공단 종복원기술원) ;
  • 권구희 (국립공원관리공단 종복원기술원) ;
  • 이화진 (국립공원관리공단 종복원기술원)
  • Received : 2014.03.28
  • Accepted : 2014.06.20
  • Published : 2014.06.30

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the monitoring efficiency of camera trapping in wild animals and to determine ways to increase its utilization. Nineteen sensor cameras were installed in Sobaeksan National Park from October 2012 to September 2013. During the study period, a total of 1045 terrestrial mammal photos were secured and 15 species habitats were identified. Shooting frequency was higher for medium and large mammals, especially full images of carnivores accounted for approximately 83%. A comparison of track surveys revealed that camera trapping was highly efficient and helped in capturing real image of species. The supply of lure and bait stimulates the sense of smell in carnivores, which further enhances the capturing of images by camera trapping. The results of this study provide data on the ecological characteristics of mammals, which can aid in determining habitat use by these animals, and thereby facilitate prevention of crop damage by wildlife.

Keywords

References

  1. Balme, G..Hunter, L. T. B. and Slotow, R. 2009. Evaluating methods for counting cryptic carnivores. Journal of Wildlife Management. 73: 431-443.
  2. Chung CU. 2006. Analysis on distribution characteristics of mammals in relation to altitude in Juwangsan national park. J. Ecol. Field Biol. 29(6): 511-520. (in Korean with English summary) https://doi.org/10.5141/JEFB.2006.29.6.511
  3. Field, S..Tyre, A. and Possingham, H. 2005. Optimizing allocation of monitoring effort under economic and observational constraints. Journal of Wildlife Management. 69: 473-482. https://doi.org/10.2193/0022-541X(2005)069[0473:OAOMEU]2.0.CO;2
  4. Foresman, K. R. and Pearson, D. E. 1998. Comparison of proposed survey procedures for detection of forest carnivores. Journal of Wildlife Management. 62: 1217-1226. https://doi.org/10.2307/3801985
  5. Giman, B..Stuebing, R. and Megum, N. 2007. A camera trapping inventory for mammals in a mixed use planted forest in Sarawak. The Raffles Bulletin of Zoology. 55(1): 209-215.
  6. Griffiths, M. G. and van Schaik, C. P. 1993. Camera trapping a new tool for the study of elusive rain forest animals. Tropical Biodiversity. 1: 131-135.
  7. Hegglin, D..Bontadina, F..Gloor, S..Romer, J.. Muller, U..Breitenmoser, U. and Deplazes, P. 2004. Baiting red foxes in an urban area: A camera trap study. Journal of Wildlife Management. 68(4): 1010-1017. https://doi.org/10.2193/0022-541X(2004)068[1010:BRFIAU]2.0.CO;2
  8. Jeong DH..Lee BK..Yand JJ..Park JS..Suh EH..Kim YK..Lee HC..Lee HJ. and Yeon SC. 2009. Behavioural analysis of Asiatic bear in limited space. Journal of Veterinary Clinics. 26(3): 246-254. (in Korean with English summary)
  9. Karanth, K. U. 1995. Estimating tiger Panthera tigris populations from camera-trap data using capture-recapture models. Biological Conservation. 71: 333-338. https://doi.org/10.1016/0006-3207(94)00057-W
  10. Karanth, K. U. and Nichols, J. D. 1998. Estimation of tiger densities in India using photographic captures and recaptures. Ecology. 79: 2852-2862. https://doi.org/10.1890/0012-9658(1998)079[2852:EOTDII]2.0.CO;2
  11. KNPS. 2007. Survey on natural resources of Sobaeksan national park.. Korea National Park Service. pp. 45-63. (in Korean)
  12. Koerth, B. H. and Kroll, J. C. 2000. Bait type and timing for deer counts using cameras triggered by infrared monitors. Wildlife Society Bulletin. 28: 630-635.
  13. Lee BK..Cho JW..Lim SJ..Kim YM..Kwon GH. and Lee AN. 2011. A survey of the distribution of endangered goral (Naemohedus caudatus) in Odaesan National Park. Pro. Kor. Soc. Env. Eco. Con. 21(1): 65-68. (in Korean)
  14. Long, R. A..Donovan, T. M..Mackay, P.. Zielinski, W. J. and Buzas, J. S. 2007. Comparing scat detection dogs, cameras, and hair snares for surveying carnivores. Journal of Wildlife Management. 71: 2018-2025. https://doi.org/10.2193/2006-292
  15. Manley, P. N..Zielinski, W. J..Schlesinger, M. D. and Mori, S. R. 2004. Evaluation of a multiplespecies approach to monitoring species at the ecoregion scale, Ecological Applications. 14: 296-310. https://doi.org/10.1890/02-5249
  16. Martorello, D. A..Eason, T. H. and Pelton, M. R. 2001. A sighting technique using cameras to estimate population size of black bears. Wildlife Society Bulletin. 29: 500-567.
  17. Mccarthy, K. P..Fuller, T. K..Ming, M.. Mccarth, T. M..Waits, L. and Jumabaev, K. 2008. Assessing estimators of snow leopard abundance. Journal of Wildlife Management. 72: 1826-1833. https://doi.org/10.2193/2008-040
  18. McCullough, D. R..Pei, K. C. J. and Wang, Y. 2000. Home range, activity patterns, and habitat relations of Reeves' muntjacs in Taiwan. Journal of Wildlife Management. 64: 430-441. https://doi.org/10.2307/3803241
  19. O'Brien, T. G..Kinnaird, M. F..Wibisono, H. T. 2003. Crouching tigers, hidden prey: Sumatran tiger and prey populations in a tropical forest landscape. Animal Conservation. 6: 131-139. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1367943003003172
  20. Pettorelli, N..Lobora, A. L..Msuha, M. J.. Foley, C. and Durant, S. M. 2010. Carnivore biodiversity in Tanzania: revealing the distribution patterns of secretive mammals using camera traps. Animal Conservation. 13: 131-139. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-1795.2009.00309.x
  21. Rovero, F..Tobler, M. and Sanderson, J. 2010. Camera trapping for inventorying terrestrial vertebrates. Manual on field recording techniques and protocols for All Taxa Biodiversity Inventories and Monitoring. The Belgian National Focal Point to the Global Taxonomy Initiative. pp. 100-128.
  22. Rowcliffe, J. M..Field, J..Turvey, S. T. and Carbone, C. 2008. Estimating animal density using camera traps without the need for individual recognition. Journal of Applied Ecology. 45: 1228-1236. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2008.01473.x
  23. Samejima, H..Ong, R..Lagan, P. and Kitayama, K. 2012. Camera-trapping rates of mammals and birds in a Bornean tropical rainforest under sustainable forest management. Forest Ecology and Management. 270: 248-256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2012.01.013
  24. Silveira, L..Jacomo, A. T. A. and Diniz-Filho, J. A. F. 2003. Camera trap, line transect census and track surveys: a comparative evaluation. Biological Conservation. 114:351-355. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0006-3207(03)00063-6
  25. SRTI, 2012. Annual report. Korea National Park Service. pp. 3-10. (in Korean)
  26. Tobler, M. W..Carrillo-Percastegui, S. E.. Pitman, R. L..Mares, R. and Powell, G. 2008. An evaluation of camera traps for inventorying large and medium sized terrestrial rainforest mammals. Animal Conservation. 11: 169-178. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-1795.2008.00169.x
  27. Treves, A..Mwima, P..Plumptre, A. J. and Isoke, S. 2010. Camera-trapping forestwoodland wildlife of western Uganda reveals how gregariousness biases estimates of relative abundance and distribution. Biological Conservation. 143: 521-528. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2009.11.025
  28. Wegge, P..Pokheral, C. P. and Jnawali, S. R. 2004. Effects of trapping effort and trap shyness on estimates of tiger abundance from camera trap studies. Animal Conservation. 7: 251-256. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1367943004001441