DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Ergonomic Evaluation of Console Chairs for a Weapon Locating Radar

  • Lee, Baekhee (POSTECH: Department of Industrial and Management Engineering) ;
  • Jung, Kihyo (University of Ulsan: School of Industrial Engineering) ;
  • Jeong, Jineun (LIG Nex1: ILS Research Center) ;
  • Kim, Jinman (LIG Nex1: ILS Research Center) ;
  • Hong, Wongi (LIG Nex1: ILS Research Center) ;
  • Park, Seikwon (ROK Air Force Academy: Department of Systems Engineering) ;
  • You, Heecheon (POSTECH: Department of Industrial and Management Engineering)
  • Received : 2014.01.28
  • Accepted : 2014.02.21
  • Published : 2014.04.30

Abstract

Objective:The present study is intended to evaluate the usability of a console chair for a weapon locating radar by comparing with different kinds of chair design. Background: Console chairs need to be ergonomically designed to reduce physical workload of operators and improve mission capability; few studies have been reported which systematically evaluate usability of military console chairs. Method: Ergonomic design of a console chair, a bus seat, and an office chair was evaluated in terms of headrest, seatback, seatpan, armrest, and controller on a 7-point scale. Ten males in their 20s and 30s were recruited considering the demographic characteristics of console operators. Results: The satisfaction scores of the console chair for headrest, seatback, and seatpan were significantly higher than those of the bus seat (mean difference [MD] = 0.9) and office chair (MD = 1.3). Meanwhile, the satisfaction scores of the console chair for armrest and controller were significantly lower than those of the office chair (MD = -1.4) and bus seat (MD = -2.2). Conclusion: The armrest and controller of the console chair needs ergonomic improvements for better comfort. Application: The evaluation results of the console chair would be of use for ergonomic console chair design.

Keywords

References

  1. American National Standards Institution (ANSI), Human factors engineering of computer workstations, California, USA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 2007.
  2. Grandjean, E., Fitting the task to the man, Talor & Francis Ltd. London, 1980.
  3. Hani, Y., Amodeo, L., Yalaoui, F. and Chen, H., Ant colony optimization for solving an industrial layout problem, European Journal of Operational Research, 183(2), 633-642, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2006.10.032
  4. Holman, G.T., Carnahan, B.J. and Bulfin, R.L., "Using linear programming to optimize control panel design from an Ergonomics perspective", Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 47th Annual Meeting (pp. 1317-1321), USA, 2003.
  5. Jung, E.S., Park, S. and Chang, S.Y., A CSP technique-based interactive control panel layout, Ergonomics, 38(9), 1884-1893, 1995. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139508925236
  6. Kim, J., Yoon, S., Pyun, H., Cho, Y. and Kim, M., Design of ergonomic chair considering consumer's emotional preference and usability and development of interface for designers, Journal of the Ergonomics Society of Korea, 19(1), 2000.
  7. Kim, J., Na, H., Joe, D., Shin, Y., Park, S. and Kim, J., Development of questionnaire for automobile seat comfort evaluation, Journal of Korean Society for Emotion & Sensibility, 13(2), 381-390, 2010.
  8. Kim, Y., Park, J., Choi, Y., Lee, H., Park, K., Kim, M. and You, H., "Development of and ergonomic evaluation questionnaire for a bus seat", In Proceedings of the 2012 Fall Conference of the Korean Institute of Industrial Engineers, 2012.
  9. Kirk, N.S., et al., Discrimination of chair seat heights, Ergonomics, 12(3), 403-413, 1969. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140136908931064
  10. Kolich, M., Automobile seat comfort: occupant preferences vs. anthropometric accommodation, Applied Ergonomics, 34, 177-184, 2003. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-6870(02)00142-4
  11. Lee, H., Park, J., Choi, Y., Park, K., Yoon, M., Kim, M., Kim, K., Kim, H., Lee, Y., Kwon, O., Jung, Y. and You, H., "Development of an ergonomic bus passenger seat by an analysis of seat comfort and 3D seat profile", In Proceedings of the 2013 Fall Conference of the Korean Institute of Industrial Engineers, 2013.
  12. Pham, D.T. and Onder, H.H., A knowledge-based system for optimizing workplace layouts using a genetic algorithm, Ergonomics, 35(12), 1479-1487, 1992. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139208967417
  13. Park, J., Choi, Y., Lee, H., Park, K., Kim, M. and You, H., "Development of an ergonomic evaluation protocol for a bus seat", In Proceedings of the 2013 Spring Conference of Ergonomics Society of Korea, 2013.
  14. Sanders, M.S. and McCormick, E.J., Human factors in engineering and design, McGraw Hi, 1993.
  15. Sargent, T.A., Kay, M.G. and Sargent, R.G., A methodology for optimally designing console panels for use by a single operator, Human Factors, 39(3), 389-309, 1997. https://doi.org/10.1518/001872097778827052
  16. Smith, D.R., Andrews, D.M. and Wawrow, P.T., Development and evaluation of the automotive seating discomfort questionnaire (ASDQ), International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 36, 141-149, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ergon.2005.09.005
  17. Udoson, U.J., Ergonomic workplace construction, evaluation and improvement by CADWORK, International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 36, 219-228, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ergon.2005.11.005
  18. Wang, M.J. Liu, C.M. and Pan, Y.S., Computer-aided panel layout using a multi-criteria heuristic algorithm, Ergonomics, 29(6), 1215-1233, 1991.
  19. Xu, Y., Meng, Q., Yu, K. and Xu, Z., A layout method for control panel of thermal power plant, Key Engineering Materials, 419-420, 657-660, 2010a.
  20. Xu, Y., Meng, Q. and Yang, Z., Particle swarm algorithm applied in the layout optimization for console, Advanced Computer Control, International Conference on, 5, 541-544, 2010b.
  21. Xu, Y., Yang, Z. and Meng, Q., Particle swarm optimization method for panel layout, Key Engineering Materials, 450, 308-311, 2011.

Cited by

  1. Ergonomic Improvement of Operation Console for Pilot Aptitude Research Equipment vol.41, pp.4, 2018, https://doi.org/10.11627/jkise.2018.41.4.042