DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

한국형 기후변화대응 분석모형의 경제적 가치

Economic Valuation of the Korean Climate Change Mitigation and Adaptation Model

  • 투고 : 2014.03.31
  • 심사 : 2014.05.15
  • 발행 : 2014.06.30

초록

The objective of this research is to quantitatively valuate the economic value of analysis model related to climate change mitigation and adaptation. Due to the fact that the subject of this research, which is the Korean climate change mitigation and adaptation model, has not been actualized, a conjoint analysis applying stated preference data has utilized. As results, among the many attributes considered in this research, the value of the attribute related to reflecting Korea's current situation is analyzed to be largest in both greenhouse gas (GHG) mitigation model and climate change adaptation model. Additionally, if all the considered functional aspects are assumed to be feasible, the economic value of the Korean GHG mitigation model is assumed to be 60.3 billion Korean won(KRW) and the Korean climate change adaptation model is assumed to be 51 billion KRW.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Alcamo, J., P. Mayerhofer, R. Guardans, T. van Harmelen, J. van Minnen, J. Onigkeit, M. Posch, and B. de Vries (2002) An integrated assessment of regional air pollution and climate change in Europe: findings of the AIR-CLIM project, Environmental Science & Policy, 5, 257-272. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1462-9011(02)00037-0
  2. Bollen, J., B. Guay, S. Jamet, and J.C. Morlot (2009) Co-benefit of Climate Change Mitigation Policies: Literature Review and New Results, Economics Department Working Papers No.693, OECD, 46pp.
  3. Bussolo, M. and D. O'Connor (2001) Clearing the Air in India: the Economics of Climate Policy with Ancillary Benefits, OECD Development Centre Working Paper No.182, OECD, 61pp.
  4. Chang, K.B. and S.Y. Lee (2009) Environmental Strategies for Developing Low-Carbon Resourc-Saving Society, Korea Environment Institute, Korea, 302pp.
  5. European Commission (2012) EU Research for the Environment 2007-2013, Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Union, 57pp.
  6. IPCC (2007) Contribution of Working Group II to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 976pp.
  7. Jansen, J.C. and S.J.A. Bakker (2006) Social Cost-benefit Analysis of Climate Change Mitigation Options in a European Context, ECN-E-06-059, Energy Research Centre of the Netherlands, 90pp.
  8. Kang, S.J. (2009) Policy and its Implication to mitigate Climate Change in US, Gyeonggi Research Institute, 31pp.
  9. Kim, J.K. and S.H. Lee (2010) Climate Change Projection and Adaptation Technologies for Achieving Secure Society and Green Growth, Research Brief 2010-08, Korea Institute of S&T Evaluation and Planning, Korea, 26pp.
  10. Kim, Y.G. and K.B. Chang (2008), Economic Impacts of International Greenhouse Gas Emissions Trading, Korea Environment Institute, Korea, 87pp.
  11. Korea Environment Institute (2001) Environmental Benefit Analysis of Greenhouse Gases Mitigation Measures: Focusing on Ancillary Environmental Benefits, Ministry of Environment, Korea, 225pp.
  12. Korea Environment Institute (2009) Economic Analysis of Climate Change in Korea (I), Ministry of Environment, Korea, 379pp.
  13. Korea Environment Institute (2011) Economic Analysis of Climate Change in Korea (II), Ministry of Environment, Korea, 725pp.
  14. Korea Environment Institute (2012) Economic Analysis for Promoting R&D on Climate Change, Ministry of Environment, Korea, 146pp.
  15. Korea Environment Institute and Korea Energy Economics Institute (2000) Cost-Benefit Analysis of Greenhouse Gases Mitigation Scenarios, Ministry of Environment, Korea, 503pp.
  16. Korea Meteorological Administration (2009) Report of Global Atmosphere Watch 2008, 178pp.
  17. Kwak, S.J., S.H. Yoo, J.Y. Heo, and J.S. Lee (2005) The nonmarket value of science museum, Journal of Technology Innovation, 13, 1-17. (in Korean with English abstract) https://doi.org/10.1080/19761597.2005.9668606
  18. Luthi, S. and T. Prassler (2011) Analyzing policy support instruments and regulatory risk factors for wind energy deployment: a developers' perspective, Energy Policy, 39, 4876-4892. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2011.06.029
  19. Manne, A., R. Mendelsohn, and R. Richels (1995) MERGE - A model for evaluating regional and global effcts of GHG reduction policies, Energy Policy, 23(1), 17-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/0301-4215(95)90763-W
  20. McFadden, D. (1974) Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior, in Frontiers in Econometrics. Edited by P. Zarembka, Academic Press, New York, 105-142.
  21. Morita, T., M. Kainuma, H. Harasawa, K. Kai, L. Dong-Kun, and Y. Matsuoka (1994) Asian-Pacific integrated model for evaluating policy options to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and global warming impacts. AIM Interim Paper, National Institute for Environmental Studies, 18pp.
  22. National Audit Office (2007) Cost-effectiveness Analysis in the 2006 Climate Change Programme Review, London, 34pp.
  23. Park, N.B., J.H. Yoo, M.H. Jo, S.G. Yun, and E.C. Jeon (2012) Comparative analysis of scenarios for reducing GHG emissions in Korea by 2050 using the low carbon path calculator, Journal of Korean Society for Atmospheric Environment, 28, 556-570. (in Korean with English abstract) https://doi.org/10.5572/KOSAE.2012.28.5.556
  24. Reilly, J., S. Paltsev, B. Felzer, X. Wang, D. Kicklighter, J. Melillo, R. Prinn, M. Sarofim, A. Sokolov, and C. Wang (2007) Global Economic Effect of Changes in Crops, Pasture, and Forests due to Changing Climate, Carbon Dioxide, and Ozone, MIT joint Program on the Science and Policy of Global Change, U.S.A., 22pp.
  25. Revelt, D. and K. Train (1998) Mixed logit with repeated choices: households' choices of appliance efficiency level, The Review of Economics and Statistics, 80, 647-657. https://doi.org/10.1162/003465398557735
  26. Song, C.K., S. Lee, and J. Yoon (2011) A review of the integrated strategy for climate change and air pollution management, Journal of Korean Society for Atmospheric Environment, 27, 805-818. (in Korean with English abstract) https://doi.org/10.5572/KOSAE.2011.27.6.805
  27. Stern, N. (2007) The Economics of Climate Change: The Stern Review, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 692pp.
  28. Train, K. (2003) Discrete Choice Method with Simulation, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 334pp.
  29. Train, K. and G. Sonnier (2005) Mixed logit with bounded distribution of partworths, in Applications of Simulation Methods in Environmental and Resource Economics. Edited by R. Scarpa and A. Alberini, Springer, Dordrecht, 117-134.
  30. West, J.J., A.M. Fiore, L.W. Horowitz, and D.L. Mauzerall (2006) Global health benefits of mitigating ozone pollution with methane emission controls, Proceedings of National Academy of Science, 103, 3988-3993. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0600201103
  31. Yoon, J.B. (2010) Guideline Development to Establishing Science and Technology Policy for Low Carbon Green City, The Korean Academy of Science and Technology, 109pp.