Industrial Engineering and Management Systems

  • 제13권2호
  • /
  • Pages.203-209
  • /
  • 2014
  • /
  • 1598-7248(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2234-6473(eISSN)
대한산업공학회 (Korean Institute of Industrial Engineers)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Risk Management Framework for New Product Development: A Case Study

  • Kasemset, Chompoonoot (Department of Industrial Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Chiang Mai University) ;
  • Wannagoat, Jaruwan (Department of Industrial Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Chiang Mai University) ;
  • Wattanutchariya, Wassanai (Department of Industrial Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Chiang Mai University) ;
  • Tippayawong, Korrakot Y. (Department of Industrial Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Chiang Mai University)
  • 투고 : 2014.01.31
  • 심사 : 2014.05.21
  • 발행 : 2014.06.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

This research designed and implemented a supply chain risk management platform and applied it to a case study of reduced-fat Lanna pork sausage as a new product development project. The proposed framework has three stages: risk identification, risk assessment, and risk mitigation. Seventeen risk agents with 17 risk events were identified based on SWOT analysis and the Porter Five Forces concept through the process of planning, sourcing, making and delivering, partially captured from the supply chain operations reference model in the first stage. In the second stage, an house of risk (HOR) framework was applied to present the impacts of each risk agent. In the third stage, eight risk agents with high impact were selected to design 21 preventive actions. Finally, three preventive actions with the highest effectiveness to difficulty ratio scores-'sales evaluation of familiar products', 'increasing distribution channels and promotions to improve sales', and 'work flow improvement for work safety'-were then recommended for this new product development.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Duarte, C., Ettkin, L. P., Helms, M. M., and Anderson, M. S. (2006), The challenge of Venezuela: a SWOT analysis, Competitiveness Review: An International Business Journal incorporating Journal of Global Competitiveness, 16(3/4), 233-247. https://doi.org/10.1108/10595420610818857
  2. Ishii, K., Koitabashi, M., and Mihara, I. (2004), Product development based on an environmental management system, Industrial Engineering and Management Systems, 3(1), 71-77.
  3. Ishioka, M., Yasuda, K., and Iwata, K. (2003), A study on management strategies at the growth stage of product life cycle, Industrial Engineering and Management Systems, 2(2), 131-139.
  4. Koo, H., Chau, K. Y., Koo, L. C., Liu, S., and Tsui, S. C. (2011), A structured SWOT approach to develop strategies for the government of Macau, SAR, Journal of Strategy and Management, 4(1), 62-81. https://doi.org/10.1108/17554251111110122
  5. March-Chorda, I., Gunasekaran, A., and Lloria-Aramburo, B. (2002), Product development process in Spanish SMEs: an empirical research, Technovation, 22(5), 301-312. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-4972(01)00021-9
  6. Nakkiew, W., Wannagoat, J., Wattanutchriya, W., Chaijaruwanich, A. (2012), Business feasibility methodology for introducing new developed local food product, Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management, Macao, 71-74.
  7. Porter, M. E. (1979), How competitive forces shape strategy, Harvard Business Review, 79208, 137-145.
  8. Pujawan, I. N. and Geraldin, L. H. (2009), House of risk: a model for proactive supply chain risk management, Business Process Management Journal, 15(6), 953-967. https://doi.org/10.1108/14637150911003801
  9. Stewart-Knox, B. and Mitchell, P. (2003), What separates the winners from the losers in new food product development? Trends in Food Science and Technology, 14(1), 58-64. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0924-2244(02)00239-X
  10. The Supply Chain Council Inc. (2008), SCOR: The Supply Chain Reference (ver. 9.0), The Supply-Chain Council, Cypress, TX.
  11. Susterova, M., Lavin, J., and Riives J. (2012), Risk management in product development process, Annals of DAAAM, 23(1), 225-228.

피인용 문헌

  1. Critical Behavioral Risk Factors among Principal Participants in the Chinese Construction Industry vol.10, pp.9, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3390/su10093158
  2. 공급능력 리스크를 고려한 최적 구매계획 해법 vol.42, pp.1, 2016, https://doi.org/10.7232/jkiie.2016.42.1.038
  3. Understanding the impact of supply-side decisions and practices on supply risk management vol.27, pp.5, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1108/bij-06-2019-0272
  4. A New Product Risk Model for the Electric Vehicle Industry in South Korea vol.18, pp.9, 2014, https://doi.org/10.15722/jds.18.9.202009.31