Journal of Information Processing Systems

Korea Information Processing Society (한국정보처리학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Content Modeling Based on Social Network Community Activity

  • Received : 2013.07.02
  • Accepted : 2013.09.26
  • Published : 2014.06.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The advancement of knowledge society has enabled the social network community (SNC) to be perceived as another space for learning where individuals produce, share, and apply content in self-directed ways. The content generated within social networks provides information of value for the participants in real time. Thus, this study proposes the social network community activity-based content model (SoACo Model), which takes SNC-based activities and embodies them within learning objects. The SoACo Model consists of content objects, aggregation levels, and information models. Content objects are composed of relationship-building elements, including real-time, changeable activities such as making friends, and participation-activity elements such as "Liking" specific content. Aggregation levels apply one of three granularity levels considering the reusability of elements: activity assets, real-time, changeable learning objects, and content. The SoACo Model is meaningful because it transforms SNC-based activities into learning objects for learning and teaching activities and applies to learning management systems since they organize activities -- such as tweets from Twitter -- depending on the teacher's intention.

Keywords

References

  1. M. A. Chatti, M. Jarke, and M. Specht, "The 3P learning model," Educational Technology & Society, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 74-85, 2010.
  2. N. Manouselis, H. Drachsler, R. Vuorikari, H. Hummel, and R. Koper, "Recommender systems in technology enhanced learning," in Recommender Systems Handbook, F. Ricci, L. Rokach, B. Shapira, and P. B. Kantor, Eds. New York, NY: Springer, 2011, pp. 387-415.
  3. N. Selwyn, "Web 2.0 applications as alternative environments for informal learning: a critical review," in OECD-KERIS Expert Meeting, Seoul, Korea, 2007, pp. 1-10.
  4. N. Selwyn, "Faceworking: exploring students' education-related use of Facebook," Learning, Media and Technology, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 157-174, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439880902923622
  5. E. Kaldoudi, N. Dovrolis, D. Giordano, and S. Dietze, "Educational resources as social objects in semantic social networks," in Proceeding of the 8th Extended Semantic Web Conference, Heraklion, Greece, 2011.
  6. S. Kinsella, M. Wang, J. G. Breslin, and C. Hayes, "Improving categorisation in social media using hyperlinks to structured data sources," in Proceeding of the 8th Extended Semantic Web Conference, Heraklion, Greece, 2011.
  7. Xyleme Inc. (2010). User generated content: an evolution in social learning [Online]. Available: http://www.xyleme.com/files/File_Share39/docs/white_papers/User-Generated-Content-an-Evolution-in-Social-Learning-wp.pdf
  8. R. N. Beyers, "A five dimensional model for educating the net generation," Educational Technology & Society, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 218-227, 2009.
  9. R. E. Horn, "Information mapping," Training in Business and Industry, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 1-8, 1974.
  10. Information Mapping Inc. (1999). The Information $Mapping^{(R)}$ method: 30 years of research: research paper & notes [Online]. Available: http://www.writec.com/Media_public/IMI_history_and_results.pdf
  11. Namahn (2006). Content mapping: a research note [Online]. Available: www.namahn.com
  12. K. Verbert, "An architecture and framework for flexible reuse of learning object components," Ph.D. dissertation, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium, 2008.
  13. K. Verbert and E. Duval, "ALOCOM: a generic content model for learning objects," International Journal on Digital Libraries, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 41-63, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00799-008-0039-8
  14. M. D. Merrill, "Component display theory," in Instructional Design Theory, M. D. Merrill and D. Twitchell, Eds. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications, 1994, pp. 177-212.
  15. C. A. Allen and E. K. Mugisa, "Improving learning object reuse through OOD: a theory of learning objects," Journal of Object Technology, vol. 9, no. 6, pp. 51-75, 2010. https://doi.org/10.5381/jot.2010.9.6.a3
  16. Samuel Schluep, "Modularization and structured markup for web-based learning content in an academic environment," Ph.D. dissertation, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland, 2005.
  17. IEEE Standard for Learning Object Metadata, IEEE Standard 1484.12.1, 2002.
  18. Cisco Systems, "Reusable learning object strategy: designing and developing learning objects for multiple learning approaches," Cisco Systems White Paper, 2003.
  19. P. Jesukiewicz (2009). SCORM 2004 4th Edition Content Aggregation Model (CAM) Version 1.1 [Online]. Available: http://www.adlnet.gov/scorm/
  20. E. Fernandes, H. Madhour, S. Miniaoui, and M. W. Forte, "Phoenix tool: support for semantic learning model," in Workshop on Applications of Semantic Web Technologies for e-Learning, 2005, pp.1-7.
  21. K. Verbert, J. Klerkx, M. Meire, J. Najjar, and E. Duval, "Towards a global component architecture for learning objects: an ontology based approach," in On the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems 2004: OTM 2004 Workshops (Lecture Notes in Computer Science Vol. 3292), R. Meersman, Z. Tari, and A. Corsaro, Eds. Heidelberg, Germany: Springer Berlin, 2004, pp. 713-722.
  22. H. J. Nelson, G. Poels, M. Genero, and M. Piattini, "A conceptual modeling quality framework," Software Quality Journal, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 201-228, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11219-011-9136-9
  23. J. Jones and C. McNaught, "Learning object evaluation and reuse: a Hong Kong experience," in Content Management for E-Learning, N. F. Ferrer and J. M. Alfonso, Eds. New York, NY: Springer, 2011, pp. 157-177.
  24. C. Barritt and F. L. Alderman, Jr., "Introducing reusable learning objects," in Creating a Reusable Learning Objects Strategy: Leveraging Information and Learning in a Knowledge Economy, C. Barritt, Ed. San Francisco, CA: Pfeiffer, 2004, pp. 5-25.
  25. J. Sanz-Rodriguez, J. Dodero, and S. Sanchez-Alonso, "Metrics-based evaluation of learning object reusability," Software Quality Journal, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 121-140, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11219-010-9108-5
  26. S. Dann, "Twitter content classification," First Monday, vol. 15, no, 12, pp. 1-11, 2010.
  27. H. Kwak, C. Lee, H. Park, and S. Moon, "What is Twitter, a social network or a news media?" in Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on World Wide Web, Raleigh, NC, 2010, pp. 591-600.
  28. L. Guo, E. Tan, S. Chen, X. Zhang, and Y. Zhao, "Analyzing patterns of user content generation in online social networks," in Proceedings of the 15th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, Paris, France, 2009, pp. 369-378.
  29. P. Molnar, A. Karpati, and K. Aoki, "Social web applications for the intercultural projects: results of a Japanese-Hungarian collaborative teaching experiment," in Proceedings of the LOGOS Open Conference on Strengthening the Integration of ICT Research Effort, Budapest, Hungary, 2009, pp. 155-166.
  30. D. Wiley, "Learning objects, content management, and E-learning," in Content Management for E-Learning, N. F. Ferrer and J. M. Alfonso, Eds. New York, NY: Springer, 2011, pp. 43-54.
  31. T. Franklin and M. van Harmelen (2007). Web 2.0 for Content for Learning and Teaching in Higher Education [Online]. Available: http://www.jisc.ac.uk/media/documents/programmes/digitalrepositories/web2-content-learning-and-teaching.pdf

Cited by

  1. Identifying the social-balanced densest subgraph from signed social networks vol.72, pp.7, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11227-015-1606-6
  2. Getting Business Insights through Clustering Online Behaviors vol.2015, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/914314
  3. cSketch: a novel framework for capturing cliques from big graph 2018, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11227-017-2114-7
  4. Iceberg Clique queries in large graphs vol.256, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2015.12.142
  5. Social group recommendation based on dynamic profiles and collaborative filtering vol.209, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2015.11.120
  6. k-Cliques mining in dynamic social networks based on triadic formal concept analysis vol.209, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2015.10.141
  7. Social network security: Issues, challenges, threats, and solutions vol.421, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2017.08.063
  8. Learner Activity Modeling Based on Teaching and Learning Activities Data vol.5, pp.9, 2016, https://doi.org/10.3745/KTSDE.2016.5.9.411
  9. A model for collecting and analyzing action data in a learning process based on activity theory vol.22, pp.20, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-017-2969-9