DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Ileal Digestibility of Amino Acids in Meat Meal and Soybean Meal Fed to Growing Pigs

  • Kong, C. (Department of Animal Science and Technology, Konkuk University) ;
  • Kang, H.G. (Department of Animal Science and Technology, Konkuk University) ;
  • Kim, B.G. (Department of Animal Science and Technology, Konkuk University) ;
  • Kim, K.H. (Department of Food and Animal Biotechnology, Seoul National University)
  • Received : 2013.03.26
  • Accepted : 2013.04.28
  • Published : 2014.07.01

Abstract

The objective of this experiment was to determine the concentration and digestibility of crude protein (CP) and amino acid (AA) in meat meal (MM), and to compare these values with the respective values in soybean meal (SBM). Six barrows (initial body weight = $66.9{\pm}3.8kg$) surgically fitted with a T-cannula at the distal ileum were allotted to a replicated $3{\times}3$ balanced Latin square design with 3 diets and 3 periods. Two experimental diets containing test ingredients as the sole source of AA were prepared to estimate the apparent ileal digestibility (AID) for CP and AA by the direct method. An N-free diet was also prepared to estimate basal endogenous losses of CP and AA. All experimental diets contained 5% chromic oxide as an indigestible index. Each period consisted of a 5-d adaptation period and a 2-d of ileal digesta collection period. Ileal digesta samples were collected from 0900 to 1700 on d 6 and 7 of each period. The concentrations of CP, Lys, Met, and Trp in MM and SBM were analyzed to be 64.1, 3.5, 1.1 and 0.6, and 45.6, 2.8, 0.8, and 0.3%, respectively. The AID of all AA except Gly in MM was less (p<0.05) than in SBM. The AID of Lys, Met, and Trp in MM was estimated to be 56.0, 71.7, and 47.1%, respectively. The SID of all AA in MM was less (p<0.05) than in SBM. The SID of Lys, Met, and Trp was 65.1, 79.2, and 78.5%, respectively. In conclusion, the CP and AA contents in MM were greater than those in SBM whereas the ileal digestibility of all AA in MM was less than in SBM.

Keywords

References

  1. AAFCO. 2010. Official Publication. Association of American Feed Control Officials Inc., West Lafayette, IN, USA.
  2. AOAC. 2005. Official Methods of Analysis. 18th ed. Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Gaithersburg, MD, USA.
  3. Cromwell, G. L., T. S. Stahly, and H. J. Monegue. 1991. Amino acid supplementation of meat meal in lysine-fortified, cornbased diets for growing-finishing pigs. J. Anim. Sci. 69:4898-4906.
  4. de Lange, C. F. M., W. C. Saucer, R. Mosenthin, and W. B. Souffrant. 1989. The effect of feeding different protein-free amino acid composition of endogenous protein collected from the distal ileum and feces in pigs. J. Anim. Sci. 67:746-754.
  5. Eastoe, J. E. and B. Eastoe. 1954. The organic constituents of mammalian compact bone. Biochem. J. 57:453-459.
  6. Gottlob, R. O., J. M. DeRouchey, M. D. Tokach, R. D. Goodband, S. S. Dritz, J. L. Nelssen, C. W. Hastad, and D. A. Knabe. 2006. Amino acid and energy digestibility of protein sources for growing pigs. J. Anim. Sci. 84:1396-1402.
  7. Jondreville, C., J. Van den Broecke, F. Gatel, and S. Van Cauwenberghe. 1995. Ileal Digestibility of Amino Acids in Feedstuffs for Pigs. Eurolysine/ITFC publication, Paris, France.
  8. Jorgensen, H., W. C. Sauer, and P. A. Thacker. 1984. Amino acid availabilities in soybean meal, sunflower meal, fish meal and meat and bone meal fed to growing pigs. J. Anim. Sci. 58:926-934.
  9. Kim, B. G. and H. H. Stein. 2009. A spreadsheet program for making a balanced Latin square design. Rev. Colomb. Cienc. Pecu. 22:591-596.
  10. Kim, B. G., D. Y. Kil, Y. Zhang, and H. H. Stein. 2012. Concentrations of analyzed or reactive lysine, but not crude protein, may predict the concentration of digestible lysine in distillers dried grains with solubles fed to pigs. J. Anim. Sci. 90:3798-3808. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2011-4692
  11. Mosenthin, R., W. C. Sauer, R. Blank, J. Huisman, and M. Z. Fan. 2000. The concept of digestible amino acids in diet formulation for pigs. Livest. Prod. Sci. 64:265-280. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-6226(99)00139-6
  12. NRC. 1998. Nutrient Requirements of Swine. 10th ed. National Academy Press, Washington, DC, USA.
  13. NRC. 2012. Nutrient Requirements of Swine. 11th ed. National Academy Press, Washington, DC, USA.
  14. Park, C. S., S. I. Oh, and B. G. Kim. 2013. Prediction of basal endogenous losses of amino acids based on body weight and feed intake in pigs fed nitrogen-free diets. Rev. Colomb. Cienc. Pecu. 26:186-192.
  15. Parsons, C. M., F. Castanon, and Y. Han. 1997. Protein and amino acid quality of meat and bone meal. Poult. Sci. 76:361-368. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/76.2.361
  16. Sauer, W. C. and L. Ozimek. 1986. Digestibility of amino acids in swine: Results and their practical applications. A review. Livest. Prod. Sci. 15:367-388. https://doi.org/10.1016/0301-6226(86)90076-X
  17. Son, A. R., Y. Hyun, J. K. Htoo, and B. G. Kim. 2014. Amino acid digestibility in copra expellers and palm kernel expellers by growing pigs. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 187:91-97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2013.09.015
  18. Stein, H. H., B. Seve, M. F. Fuller, P. J. Moughan, and C. F. M. de Lange. 2007. Invited review: Amino acid bioavailability and digestibility in pig feed ingredients: Terminology and application. J. Anim. Sci. 85:172-180. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2005-742
  19. Stein, H. H., C. F. Shipley, and R. A. Easter. 1998. Technical note: a technique for inserting a T-cannula into the distal ileum of pregnant sows. J. Anim. Sci. 76:1433-1436.
  20. Stein, H. H., C. Pedersen, A. R. Wirt, and R. A. Bohlke. 2005. Additivity of values for apparent and standardized ileal digestibility of amino acids in mixed fed to growing pigs. J. Anim. Sci. 83:2387-2395.
  21. Stein, H. H., S. W. Kim, T. T. Nielsen, and R. A. Easter. 2001. Standardized ileal protein and amino acid digestibility by growing pigs and sows. J. Anim. Sci. 79:2113-2122.
  22. Traylor, S. L., G. L. Cromwell, and M. D. Lindemann. 2005. Bioavailability of phosphorus in meat and bone meal for swine. J. Anim. Sci. 83:1054-1061.
  23. Wang, X. and C. M. Parsons. 1998. Effect of raw material source, processing system, and processing temperatures on amino acid digestibility of meat and bone meals. Poult. Sci. 77:834-841. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/77.6.834

Cited by

  1. Ileal endogenous losses in pigs feeding a protein-free diet or diets with different contents of casein or crystalline amino acids vol.71, pp.3, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1080/1745039X.2017.1312832
  2. The influence of narrow-leafed lupin seed fermentation on their chemical composition and ileal digestibility and microbiota in growing pigs vol.71, pp.4, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1080/1745039X.2017.1329130
  3. Standardized Ileal Digestibility of Amino Acids in Feed Ingredients for Broiler Chickens vol.47, pp.3, 2014, https://doi.org/10.5536/kjps.2020.47.3.135
  4. Comprehensive overview of the quality of plant‐ And animal‐sourced proteins based on the digestible indispensable amino acid score vol.8, pp.10, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1002/fsn3.1809
  5. Protein and energy concentrations of meat meal and meat and bone meal fed to pigs based on in vitro assays vol.7, pp.1, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aninu.2020.07.007
  6. The Effect of Yeast Fermentation of Two Lupine Species on the Digestibility of Protein and Amino Acids, Microflora Composition and Metabolites Production in the Ileum of Growing Pigs vol.11, pp.10, 2014, https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11102894
  7. Energy concentration and phosphorus digestibility in meat meal, fish meal, and soybean meal fed to pigs vol.34, pp.11, 2014, https://doi.org/10.5713/ab.21.0102