DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

무게 단원 수업에서 겪는 교사와 학생의 어려움 분석

An Analysis of Difficulties of Teachers and Students in Class on Weight

  • 투고 : 2014.04.25
  • 심사 : 2014.05.12
  • 발행 : 2014.05.30

초록

본 연구의 목적은 무게 재기 단원을 지도한 교사가 겪는 어려움과 무게 재기 단원을 학습하는 학생들이 겪는 어려움을 탐색하는 데에 있다. 이를 위해 교사 대상으로는 설문지, 면담, 자기반성성찰지를, 학생 대상으로는 설문지, 단원평가지, 면담을 통하여 자료를 수집하였으며 반복적으로 자료를 검토하고 범주화 하였다. 분석한 자료는 과학교육 전문가 2명과 함께 검토하였다. 연구결과 교사들이 겪는 어려움은 교사들의 절차적 지식의 부족, 교육과정의 연계성 부족, 충분하지 못한 수업환경, 그리고 학생들의 조작능력 미숙으로부터 나타났다. 학생들이 겪는 어려움은 오개념의 발생, 이해하기 어려운 개념, 조작능력 미숙, 수학적 능력의 부족, 실제에 원리 적용의 어려움, 문제해결능력 부족으로부터 나타났다. 그리고 교사들은 학생들이 실험부분에서 더 어려움을 겪는다고 인식을 하였으나 학생들은 개념을 이해하는데 더 많은 어려움을 겪는 것으로 나타났다.

The purpose of this study is to investigate the difficulties of teachers and students on the unit about 'measuring weight.' In this research, we have acquired data about teachers through survey, interview, and self-reflection journals, at the same time we have collected information on the students through survey, assessment test, and interview. We have extracted the difficulties from analysis with constant comparison method. In addition, we have analysed the curriculum of science and mathematics to know the leaning sequence. The analysis had been checked up by experts in science education. The result of the study is as follows: The difficulties of teachers are from the lack of teachers' descriptive knowledge, disorder of conceptual hierarchy in the curriculum, poor experimental instruments, and low psychomotor skill of students. The difficulties of students are from common misconceptions, opaque concepts, lack of manipulation skill, insufficiency of mathematical ability, difficulty of application of principles to the real situation, and lack of problem-solving ability. In addition, teachers have recognized that students face more difficulties in experiment class, while students think that they face more difficulties in conceptual understanding class.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Cochran, K. L., DeRuiter, J. A., & King, R. A. (1993). Pedagogical content knowing: An intergrative model for teacher preparation. Journal of Teacher Education, 44(4), 263-272. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487193044004004
  2. De Jong, O., & Van Driel, J. (2004). Exploring the development of student teachers' PCK of the multiple meanings of chemistry topics. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 2(4), 477-491. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-004-4197-x
  3. Galili, I. (1993). Weight and gravity: Teachers' ambiguity and students' confusion about the concepts. International Journal of Science Education, 15(2), 149-162. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069930150204
  4. Galili, I. (2001). Weight versus gravitational force: Historical and educational perspectives. International Journal of Science Education, 23(10), 1073-1093. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690110038585
  5. Glaser, B., & Strauss, A (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. London: Wiedenfeld and Nicholson.
  6. Grossman, P.L. (1990). The making of a teacher: Teacher knowledge and teacher education. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
  7. Jeon, W. (1993). Mainly physics concept: A survey on the scientific misconception of the elementary students. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 26(1), 97-107.
  8. Kwak, Y. (2006). Definition of pedagogical content knowledge and ways of raising teaching professionalism as examined by secondary school science teachers. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 26(4), 527-536.
  9. Kwon, Y., Jeong, J., Shin, D., Lee, J., Lee, I., & Byeon, J. (2011). The formation and evaluation of scientific knowledge[과학지식의 생성과 평가]. Seoul: Hakjisa.
  10. Lee, S., Jhun, Y., Hong, J., Shin, Y., Choi, J., & Lee, I. (2007). Difficulties experienced by elementary school teachers in science classes. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 26(1), 97-107.
  11. Loughran, J. Mulhall, P., & Berry, A. (2004). In search of pedagogical content knowledge in science: Developing ways of articulating and documenting professional practice. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(4), 370-391. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20007
  12. Magnusson, S., Krajcik, J., & Borko, H. (1999). Nature, sources, and development of PCK. In J. Gess-Newsome & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Examining pedagogical content knowledge (pp. 95-132). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
  13. Marks, R. (1990). Pedagogical content knowledge: From a mathematical case to a modified conception. Journal of teacher education, 41(3), 3-11.
  14. Merriam, S. B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study application in education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  15. Ministry of Education, Science and Technology. (2008). 2007 revised curriculum: Science subject. http://ncic.re.kr/
  16. Ministry of Education, Science and Technology. (2008). 2007 revised curriculum: Mathematics Subject. http://ncic.re.kr/
  17. Oh, P., Lee, S., Lee, K., Kim, C., & Kim, H. (2008). Narrative inquiry on student-teachers' teaching experiences with extra curricular science classes of a high school: Types and characteristics of the knowledge constructed by the pre-service science teachers. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 28(6), 546-564.
  18. Oh, W., & Park, S. (1995). The comparison of daily meanings of 'force' between elementary students and pre-service teachers. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 14(1), 85-91.
  19. Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4-14.
  20. Van Driel, J. H., Verloop, N., & De Vos, W. (1998). Developing science teachers' pedagogical content knowledge. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35, 673-695. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199808)35:6<673::AID-TEA5>3.0.CO;2-J
  21. Veal, W. R. & Makinster, J. G. (1999). Pedagogical content knowledge taxonomies. Electronic Journal of Science Education, 3(4).
  22. Youn, K. (1994). A study on the student's misconceptions of weight. Science Education Research, 16, 31-39.
  23. Zhaoyao, M. (1993). Difficulties in teaching and learning mechanics: a consideration of three problems. Physics Education, 28(6), 371. https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9120/28/6/006

피인용 문헌

  1. An Analysis on the Students' Achievement in the 'Speed of Objects' Chapter based on the Integrated Science and Mathematics Classes for Elementary School Students vol.34, pp.4, 2015, https://doi.org/10.15267/keses.2015.34.4.372
  2. Teachers and Students’ Difficulties to Suffer in the Classes on‘World of Small Living Things’Unit of Elementary School Science vol.43, pp.3, 2014, https://doi.org/10.15717/bioedu.2015.43.3.240
  3. 고등학생의 투지, 흥미, 과제집착력, 자기조절능력 및 과학학업성취의 관계 분석 vol.36, pp.3, 2016, https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2016.36.3.0445
  4. 2015 개정 초등 과학과 교육과정의 성취 기준과 탐구 활동 변화 분석 vol.36, pp.1, 2014, https://doi.org/10.15267/keses.2017.36.1.043