DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

우분에 깔짚 혼입 수준이 퇴비화 과정중 이화학적 성상 변화와 지렁이 생존에 미치는 영향

Effects of Mixing Ratios of Cow Manure and Stall Bedding on Physico-Chemical Characteristics and Earthworm (Eisenia foetida) Survival

  • 투고 : 2014.01.05
  • 심사 : 2014.01.19
  • 발행 : 2014.03.30

초록

본 연구는 가축의 축사에 깔짚으로 이용되는 톱밥을 수준별(0(CSD0구), 10(CSD10구), 20(CSD20구), 30(CSD30구) 및 40%(CSD40구))로 우분과 혼합한 다음 부숙기간 중의 이화학적 성상 변화가 지렁이 생존에 미치는 영향을 조사함으로써 vermicomposting을 이용한 가축분의 친환경적 처리에 기초자료로 이용하고자 실시되었다. 그 결과를 요약하면 다음과 같다. 부숙이 경과함에 따라 3주부터 모든 구에서 지렁이의 생존이 가능하였다. 처리구별 탄질비는 톱밥 혼합구가 CSD0구 보다 유의하게 높았다(p<0.05). 지렁이가 생존하기 시작한 3주차의 탄질비는 23.26~61.05로 나타났다. 부숙이 경과함에 따라 pH와 전기전도도는 CSD0구에서 가장 높았고, 톱밥의 혼입 비율이 높을수록 pH와 전기전도도는 낮은 경향이었다. 지렁이가 생존하기 시작한 pH와 전기전도도는 각각 7.4~7.7과 0.28~1.17mS/cm으로 나타났다. 이상의 결과를 종합해 보면 우분에 다양한 수준의 톱밥을 혼합하여 부숙시켰을 경우 이화학적 성상 변화는 모두 지렁이 생존이 가능한 범위로 나타났으나, 우분의 효율적인 지렁이 퇴비화를 위해서는 톱밥 혼입 비율에 따른 지렁이의 생육과 증식 조사를 위한 시험이 필요하다고 사료되어 진다.

The present study was conducted to provide basic data for environmentally friendly treatment of manure using vermicomposting by investigating the influence of physiochemical property change during the composting period on the survival of earthworms after mixing cow manure in different levels (0(CSD0), 10(CSD10), 20(CSD20), 30(CSD30), and 40%(CSD40)) with the sawdust that is used bedding in livestock pens. As composting proceeds, earthworms were able to survive in all treatments after 3 weeks. In terms of the C/N ratio by treatment groups, the sawdust mix treatment was significantly higher than the CSD0 treatment (p<0.05). The C/N ratio in the 3rdweek when earthworms started surviving was 23.26-61.05. As composting progressed, pH and electrolytic conductivity were highest in the CSD0 treatment and tended to decrease with higher proportion of sawdust in the mix. It was found that pH and electrolytic conductivity that earthworms starting to survive are 7.4-7.7 and 0.28-1.17 mS/cm respectively. To summarize, when composing cow manure with various levels of sawdust mix, all physiochemical property changes turned out to allow the survival of earthworms, but the results suggest that efficient vermicomposting requires the tests to examine growth and reproduction according to the sawdust mix ratio.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. A.O.A.C. 1995. Official Methods of Analysis (15th Ed.). Association of Official Analytical Chemists. Washington D. C.
  2. Baker, M., B. Knoop, S. Quiring, A. Beard, B. Lesikar, J. Sweeten, and R. Burns. 1999. Composting Guide Index. Prepared by the Texas Agricultural Extension Service Solid and Hazardous Waste Management Initiative Team. Chap. 1. The Decomposition Process.
  3. Cardenas, R. R. and L. K. Wang. 1989. Evaluation of city refuse compost maturity : A review. Biological Wastes. 27: 115-142. https://doi.org/10.1016/0269-7483(89)90039-6
  4. Choi, H. K. 1992. A study on sludge feed and breeding condition in vermicomposting of organic sludge. Ph. D. Thesis. University of Seoul.
  5. Curry, J. P. 1976. Some effect of animal manures on earthworms in grassland. Pedobiologia. Bd. 16: 425-438.
  6. Edwards, C. A. 1988. Breakdown of animal, vegetable and industrial organic wastes by earthworms. Earthworms in waste and environmental management. SPB Academic Publishing, The Hague, The Netherlands. pp. 21-31.
  7. Edwards, C. A. 1995. Commercial and environmental potential of vermicomposting: A historical overview. BioCycle, June, 62-63.
  8. EPA. 1980. Compendium on solid waste management by vermicomposting. Municipal Environmental Research Laboratory, Cincinnati OH 45268, EPA-600/8-80-033.
  9. Fostage, O. T. and M. R. Babb. 1972. Biodegradation of animal waste by Lumbricus terrestris. J. Dairy Sci. 55: 870-872. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(72)85586-3
  10. Garcia. G., T. Hernandez. F. B. Costa, and G. Masciandaro. 1993. Kinetics of phosphatase activity in organic wastes. Soil Biol, Biochem. 25(5): 561-565. https://doi.org/10.1016/0038-0717(93)90194-G
  11. Hartenstein, R., Edward F. Neuhauser, and David L. Kaplan. 1979. Reproductive Potential of the Earthworm Eisenia foetida. Oecologia (Berl.) 43: 329-340. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00344959
  12. Huang, G. F., M. Fang, O. T. Wu, L. X. Zhou, and J. W. C. Wong. 2001. Co-composting of pig manure with leaves. Environ, Technol. 22: 1203-1212. https://doi.org/10.1080/09593332208618207
  13. Inbar, Y., Y. Chen, and Y. Hadar. 1990. Humic substances formed during the composting of organic matter. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 54: 1316-1323. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1990.03615995005400050019x
  14. Inbar, Y., Y. Hadar, and Y. Chen. 1993. Recycling of cattle manure: The composting process and characterization of minority. J. Environ. Qual. 22: 857-863.
  15. Jo, I. H., H. J. Jun, and J. S. Lee. 2003. Utilization of Earthworm Cast as a Component of Plant Growth Medium for Tomato. Korean J. Organic Agri. 11(1): 55-66.
  16. Kaushik, P. and V. K. Garg. 2004. Dynamics of biological and chemical parameters during vermicomposting of solid textile mill sludge mixed with cow dung and agricultural residues. Bioresource Technology 94: 203-209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2003.10.033
  17. Lee, J. S., J. C. Jung, and I. H. Jo. 1992. Treatment of Industrial Waste by Vermicomposting - I. Effects of mixture ratio of paper mill sludge and cow manure on the growth of Lumbricus rubellus and the chemical composition of worm casts -. Journal of Korea society of waste management. 9(2): 19-26.
  18. Lee, J. S. 1995. Treatment of Cow Manure by Vermicomposting -Effects of population density and C/N ratios of feed on the growth and cast production of the earthworm (Eisenia foetida) -. Journal of livestock housing and environment 1(1): 65-75
  19. Lee, J. E., J. H. Hong, K. W. Chang, and J. Y. Hwang. 2005. Effect of pyroligneous acid liquor on the maturity of pig manure compost. Korean J. Soil Sci. Fert. 38(2): 101-107.
  20. Livestock yearbook (The Agriculture, Fisheries, Livestock News). 2012. Livestock excretions.
  21. Loh, T. C. and Y. C. Lee, J. B. Liang and D. Tan. 2005. Vermicomposting of cattle and goat manures by Eisenia foetida and their growth and reproduction performance. Bioresource Technology. 96: 111-114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2003.03.001
  22. Na, Y. E., S. B. Lee, M. S. Han, S. G. Kim, and D. R. Choi. 2000. Soil properties influencing on earthworm habitation in upland. Korean journal of soil zoology. 5(2): 165-168.
  23. Neuhauser, E. F., R. C. Loehr, and M. B. Malecki. 1988. The potential of earthworms for managing sewage sludge. In Earthworms and Waste Management. C. A. Edwards and E. F. Neuhauser (eds.). SPB Academic Publishing, The Netherlands. pp. 9-20.
  24. Poincelot, R. P. 1975. The biochemistry and methodology of composting. Bull. 754. The connecticut AGr. Expt. Station. New Haven, CT.
  25. RDA. Agricultural Technology Research Institute. 1988. Soil Chemical Analysis. Suwon. Korea.
  26. Rivero-Hernandez, R. 1991. Influence of pH on the production of Eisenia foetida. Avanc. Aliment. Anim. 31(5): 215-217.
  27. Sabine, J. R. 1983. Earthworms as a source of food and drugs-in Earthworm ecology, Chapman and Hall, London, pp. 285-296.
  28. SAS. 2013. User's Guide Statistics. Statistical Analysis System Institute Inc. Cary. NC.
  29. Stafforn, E. A. and A. G. J. Tacon. 1984. Nutritive value of the earthworm Dendrodrilus subrubicundus, Grown on domestic sewage, in Trout Diets, Agricultural wastes. 9: 249-266. https://doi.org/10.1016/0141-4607(84)90084-2
  30. Sweeten, J. M. 1988. Composting manure sludge. p.38-44. In National poultry waste management symp., Columbus, OH. Dep. of Poultry Sci., Ohio State Univ., Columbus.
  31. Tomati, U., A. Grapelli, and E. Galli. 1985. The alternative earthworm in organic wastes recycle, In the organic sludge and liquid agricultural wastes(ed.) by P. L'Hermite. Reidel, Dordrecht. pp. 510-512.
  32. University of california at Berkeley. 1953. Reclamation of municipal Refuse by composting. Tech. Bull. No. 9. Sanitary Engineering Research Project.