Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology

The Korean Society for Microbiology and Biotechnology (한국미생물·생명공학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Genome Sequence and Comparative Genome Analysis of Pseudomonas syringae pv. syringae Type Strain ATCC 19310

  • Park, Yong-Soon (Molecular Phytobacteriology Laboratory, Superbacteria Research Center, KRIBB) ;
  • Jeong, Haeyoung (Korean Bioinformation Center (KOBIC), KRIBB) ;
  • Sim, Young Mi (Korean Bioinformation Center (KOBIC), KRIBB) ;
  • Yi, Hwe-Su (Molecular Phytobacteriology Laboratory, Superbacteria Research Center, KRIBB) ;
  • Ryu, Choong-Min (Molecular Phytobacteriology Laboratory, Superbacteria Research Center, KRIBB)
  • Received : 2014.01.02
  • Accepted : 2014.01.15
  • Published : 2014.04.28
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Pseudomonas syringae pv. syringae (Psy) is a major bacterial pathogen of many economically important plant species. Despite the severity of its impact, the genome sequence of the type strain has not been reported. Here, we present the draft genome sequence of Psy ATCC 19310. Comparative genomic analysis revealed that Psy ATCC 19310 is closely related to Psy B728a. However, only a few type III effectors, which are key virulence factors, are shared by the two strains, indicating the possibility of host-pathogen specificity and genome dynamics, even under the pathovar level.

Keywords

References

  1. Agrios GN. 2005. Plant Pathology, p.952. 5th Ed. Academic Press.
  2. Alikhan NF, Petty NK, Ben Zakour NL, Beatson SA. 2011. BLAST Ring Image Generator (BRIG): simple prokaryote genome comparisons. BMC Genomics 12: 402. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-12-402
  3. Almeida NF, Yan S, Lindeberg M, Studholme DJ, Schneider DJ, Condon B, et al. 2009. A draft genome sequence of Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato T1 reveals a type III effector repertoire significantly divergent from that of Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato DC3000. Mol. Plant Microb. Interact. 22: 52-62. https://doi.org/10.1094/MPMI-22-1-0052
  4. Aziz RK, Bartels D, Best AA, DeJongh M, Disz T, Edwards RA, et al. 2008. The RAST Server: rapid annotations using subsystems technology. BMC Genomics 9: 75. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-9-75
  5. Buell CR, Joardar V, Lindeberg M, Selengut J, Paulsen IT, Gwinn ML, et al. 2003. The complete genome sequence of the Arabidopsis and tomato pathogen Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato DC3000. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100: 10181-10186 https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1731982100
  6. Bull CT, De Boer SH, Denny TP, Firrao G, Fischer-Le Saux M, Saddler GS, et al. 2010. Comprehensive list of names of plant pathogenic bacteria, 1980-2007. J. Plant Pathol. 92: 551-592.
  7. Cornelis GR, Van Gijsegem F. 2000. Assembly and function of type III secretory systems. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 54: 735-774. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.micro.54.1.735
  8. Gardan L, Shafik H, Belouin S, Broch R, Grimont F, Grimont PA. 1999. DNA relatedness among the pathovars of Pseudomonas syringae and description of Pseudomonas tremae sp. nov. and Pseudomonas cannabina sp. nov. (ex Sutic and Dowson 1959). Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 49: 469-478. https://doi.org/10.1099/00207713-49-2-469
  9. Gross H, Loper JE. 2009. Genomics of secondary metabolite production by Pseudomonas spp. Nat. Prod. Rep. 26: 1408-1446. https://doi.org/10.1039/b817075b
  10. Joardar V, Lindeberg M, Jackson RW, Selengut J, Dodson R, Brinkac LM, et al. 2005. Whole-genome sequence analysis of Pseudomonas syringae pv. phaseolicola 1448A reveals divergence among pathovars in genes involved in virulence and transposition. J. Bacteriol. 187: 6488-6498. https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.187.18.6488-6498.2005
  11. Kennelly MM, Cazorla FM, de Vicente A, Ramos C, Sundin GM. 2007. Pseudomonas syringae diseases of fruit trees. Progress toward understanding and control. Plant Dis. 91: 4-17. https://doi.org/10.1094/PD-91-0004
  12. Lessie TG, Phibbs PV. 1984. Alternative pathways of carbohydrate utilization in pseudomonads. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 38: 359-388. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.mi.38.100184.002043
  13. Lewis JD, Guttman DS, Desveaux D. 2009. The targeting of plant cellular systems by injected type III effector proteins. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 20: 1055-1063. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.semcdb.2009.06.003
  14. Lindgren PB, Peet RC, Panopoulos NJ. 1986. Gene cluster of Pseudomonas syringae pv. "phaseolicola" controls pathogenicity of bean plants and hypersensitivity of nonhost plants. J. Bacteriol. 168: 512-522. https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.168.2.512-522.1986
  15. Monier JM, Lindow SE. 2005. Aggregates of resident bacteria facilitate survival of immigrant bacteria on leaf surfaces. Microb. Ecol. 49: 343-352. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00248-004-0007-9
  16. Richter M, Rossello-Mora R. 2009. Shifting the genomic gold standard for the prokaryotic species definition. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 106: 19126-19131. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0906412106
  17. Wu X, Monchy S, Taghavi S, Zhu W, Ramos J, van der Lelie D. 2011. Comparative genomics and functional analysis of niche-specific adaptation in Pseudomonas putida. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 35: 299-323. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6976.2010.00249.x

Cited by

  1. Toward Complete Bacterial Genome Sequencing Through the Combined Use of Multiple Next-Generation Sequencing Platforms vol.26, pp.1, 2014, https://doi.org/10.4014/jmb.1507.07055