Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery

Korean Association of Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons (대한악안면성형재건외과학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Risk Factors for Wound Dehiscence after Guided Bone Regeneration in Dental Implant Surgery

  • Kim, Young-Kyun (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Section of Dentistry, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital) ;
  • Yun, Pil-Young (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Section of Dentistry, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital)
  • Received : 2014.02.20
  • Accepted : 2014.04.30
  • Published : 2014.05.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate risks for wound dehiscence after guided bone regeneration (GBR) in dental implant surgery. Methods: Patients who received dental implant therapy with GBR procedure at Seoul National University Bundang Hospital (Seongnam, Korea) from June 2004 to May 2007 were included. The clinical outcome of interest was complications related to dental implant surgery. The factors influencing wound dehiscence, classified into patient-related factors, surgery-related factors and material-related factors, were evaluated. Results: One hundred and fifteen cases (202 implants) were included in this study. Wound dehiscence (19.1%) was considered a major complication. The risk of wound dehiscence was higher in males than in females (odds ratio=4.279, P =0.014). In the main graft, the allogenic group had the lowest risk of wound dehiscence (odds ratio=0.106, P =0.006). Though the external connection group had a higher risk of wound dehiscence than the internal connection group (odds ratio=2.381), the difference was not significant (P =0.100). Conclusion: In this study, male gender and main graft have the highest risk of wound dehiscence. To reduce wound dehiscence after GBR, instructions on postoperative care with supplementary procedure for the protection of the wound dehiscence is recommended, especially to male patients. A main graft with a gel base can reduce the risk of wound dehiscence.

Keywords

References

  1. Dahlin C, Andersson L, Linde A. Bone augmentation at fenestrated implants by an osteopromotive membrane technique. A controlled clinical study. Clin Oral Implants Res 1991;2:159-65. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1991.020401.x
  2. Jovanovic SA, Spiekermann H, Richter EJ. Bone regeneration around titanium dental implants in dehisced defect sites: a clinical study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1992;7:233-45.
  3. Buser D, Ingimarsson S, Dula K, Lussi A, Hirt HP, Belser UC. Long-term stability of osseointegrated implants in augmented bone: a 5-year prospective study in partially edentulous patients. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2002;22:109-17.
  4. Sadig W, Almas K. Risk factors and management of dehiscent wounds in implant dentistry. Implant Dent 2004;13:140-7. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ID.0000127518.60701.A1
  5. Block MS, Kent JN. Factors associated with soft- and hard-tissue compromise of endosseous implants. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1990;48:1153-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/0278-2391(90)90531-6
  6. Simion M, Baldoni M, Rossi P, Zaffe D. A comparative study of the effectiveness of e-PTFE membranes with and without early exposure during the healing period. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1994;14:166-80.
  7. Machtei EE. The effect of membrane exposure on the outcome of regenerative procedures in humans: a meta-analysis. J Periodontol 2001;72:512-6. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2001.72.4.512
  8. Chiapasco M, Zaniboni M. Clinical outcomes of GBR procedures to correct peri-implant dehiscences and fenestrations: a systematic review. Clin Oral Implants Res 2009;20 Suppl 4:113-23. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01781.x
  9. Dahlin C, Gottlow J, Linde A, Nyman S. Healing of maxillary and mandibular bone defects using a membrane technique. An experimental study in monkeys. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg 1990;24:13-9. https://doi.org/10.3109/02844319009004514
  10. Buser D, Dula K, Belser U, Hirt HP, Berthold H. Localized ridge augmentation using guided bone regeneration. 1. Surgical procedure in the maxilla. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1993;13:29-45.
  11. Zarb GA, Schmitt A. The longitudinal clinical effectiveness of osseointegrated dental implants: the Toronto study. Part III: problems and complications encountered. J Prosthet Dent 1990;64:185-94. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(90)90177-E
  12. Esposito M, Hirsch J, Lekholm U, Thomsen P. Differential diagnosis and treatment strategies for biologic complications and failing oral implants: a review of the literature. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1999;14:473-90.
  13. Adell R, Lekholm U, Rockler B, et al. Marginal tissue reactions at osseointegrated titanium fixtures (I). A 3-year longitudinal prospective study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1986;15:39-52. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-9785(86)80010-2
  14. Tal H. Spontaneous early exposure of submerged implants: i. Classification and clinical observations. J Periodontol 1999;70:213-9. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1999.70.2.213
  15. Lekovic V, Kenney EB, Weinlaender M, et al. A bone regenerative approach to alveolar ridge maintenance following tooth extraction. Report of 10 cases. J Periodontol 1997;68:563-70. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1997.68.6.563
  16. Greenstein G, Cavallaro J, Romanos G, Tarnow D. Clinical recommendations for avoiding and managing surgical complications associated with implant dentistry: a review. J Periodontol 2008;79:1317-29. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2008.070067
  17. Donos N, Kostopoulos L, Karring T. Alveolar ridge augmentation using a resorbable copolymer membrane and autogenous bone grafts. An experimental study in the rat. Clin Oral Implants Res 2002;13:203-13. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2002.130211.x
  18. Donos N, Kostopoulos L, Karring T. Alveolar ridge augmentation by combining autogenous mandibular bone grafts and non-resorbable membranes. Clin Oral Implants Res 2002;13:185-91. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2002.130209.x
  19. Lorenzoni M, Pertl C, Polansky RA, Jakse N, Wegscheider WA. Evaluation of implants placed with barrier membranes. A restrospective follow-up study up to five years. Clin Oral Implants Res 2002;13:274-80. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2002.130306.x
  20. Jones JK, Triplett RG. The relationship of cigarette smoking to impaired intraoral wound healing: a review of evidence and implications for patient care. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1992; 50:237-9; discussion 239-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/0278-2391(92)90318-T
  21. Mosely LH, Finseth F, Goody M. Nicotine and its effect on wound healing. Plast Reconstr Surg 1978;61:570-5. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-197804000-00013
  22. Giglio JA, Laskin DM. Perioperative errors contributing to implant failure. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am 1998;10:197-202.
  23. Chen ST, Wilson TG Jr, Hämmerle CH. Immediate or early placement of implants following tooth extraction: review of biologic basis, clinical procedures, and outcomes. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2004;19 Suppl:12-25.
  24. Watzek G, Haider R, Mensdorff-Pouilly N, Haas R. Immediate and delayed implantation for complete restoration of the jaw following extraction of all residual teeth: a retrospective study comparing different types of serial immediate implantation. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1995;10:561-7.
  25. Rosenquist B, Grenthe B. Immediate placement of implants into extraction sockets: implant survival. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1996;11:205-9.
  26. Grunder U, Polizzi G, Goené R, et al. A 3-year prospective multicenter follow-up report on the immediate and delayed- immediate placement of implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1999;14:210-6.
  27. Nir-Hadar O, Palmer M, Soskolne WA. Delayed immediate implants: alveolar bone changes during the healing period. Clin Oral Implants Res 1998;9:26-33. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1998.090104.x
  28. Nemcovsky CE, Artzi Z. Comparative study of buccal dehiscence defects in immediate, delayed, and late maxillary implant placement with collagen membranes: clinical healing between placement and second-stage surgery. J Periodontol 2002;73:754-61. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2002.73.7.754
  29. Zitzmann NU, Naef R, Scharer P. Resorbable versus nonresorbable membranes in combination with Bio-Oss for guided bone regeneration. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1997;12:844-52.
  30. Schwartz-Arad D, Samet N, Samet N, Mamlider A. Smoking and complications of endosseous dental implants. J Periodontol 2002;73:153-7. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2002.73.2.153
  31. Adell R, Lekholm U, Rockler B, Branemark PI. A 15-year study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw. Int J Oral Surg 1981;10:387-416. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-9785(81)80077-4
  32. Nemcovsky CE, Artzi Z. Split palatal flap. I. A surgical approach for primary soft tissue healing in ridge augmentation procedures: technique and clinical results. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1999;19:175-81.
  33. Owens KW, Yukna RA. Collagen membrane resorption in dogs: a comparative study. Implant Dent 2001;10:49-58. https://doi.org/10.1097/00008505-200101000-00016
  34. Zhao S, Pinholt EM, Madsen JE, Donath K. Histological evaluation of different biodegradable and non-biodegradable membranes implanted subcutaneously in rats. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2000;28:116-22. https://doi.org/10.1054/jcms.2000.0127
  35. Buser D, Dula K, Hirt HP, Schenk RK. Lateral ridge augmentation using autografts and barrier membranes: a clinical study with 40 partially edentulous patients. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1996;54:420-32; discussion 432-3. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0278-2391(96)90113-5
  36. Mellonig JT, Nevins M. Guided bone regeneration of bone defects associated with implants: an evidence-based outcome assessment. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1995;15:168-85.
  37. von Arx T, Hardt N, Wallkamm B. The TIME technique: a new method for localized alveolar ridge augmentation prior to placement of dental implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1996;11:387-94.
  38. Kim YK, Yun PY, Kim SG, Kim BS, Ong JL. Evaluation of sinus bone resorption and marginal bone loss after sinus bone grafting and implant placement. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2009;107:e21-8.
  39. Kim YK, Yun PY, Kim SG, Lim SC. Analysis of the healing process in sinus bone grafting using various grafting materials. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2009;107:204-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2008.07.021

Cited by

  1. Lateral Ridge Splitting (Expansion) With Immediate Placement of Endosseous Dental Implant Using Piezoelectric Device vol.28, pp.2, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000003229
  2. Risk factors in bone augmentation procedures vol.81, pp.1, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1111/prd.12285
  3. Guided bone regeneration vol.46, pp.5, 2014, https://doi.org/10.5125/jkaoms.2020.46.5.361
  4. Minimizing risk of customized titanium mesh exposures – a retrospective analysis vol.20, pp.None, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-020-1023-y
  5. Collagen Membrane for Guided Bone Regeneration in Dental and Orthopedic Applications vol.27, pp.5, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.tea.2020.0140