A study on 'If the wind damage people, they feel aversion to wind. If the cold damage people, they feel aversion to cold.(상풍즉오풍 상한즉오한(傷風則惡風 傷寒則惡寒))'

'상풍즉오풍 상한즉오한(傷風則惡風 傷寒則惡寒)'에 대한 소고(小考)

  • Kim, Sang-Un (Dept. of Diagnostics, College of Korean Medicine, Wonkwang University)
  • 김상운 (원광대학교 한의과대학 진단학교실)
  • Received : 2014.03.31
  • Accepted : 2014.04.24
  • Published : 2014.04.30

Abstract

Objective I would like to identify when 'If the wind damage people, they feel aversion to wind. If the cold damage people, they feel aversion to cold.(傷風則惡風 傷寒則惡寒)' has appeared and what does this hypothesis have affected. I also researched future scholars' opinions and their criticism on this hypothesis. Methods: 1. Among the books which are related to Cold damage according to the age, books which have original text that has a relationship with this hypothesis were elected. Total of 30 books were elected, and their original text was extracted and analyzed. Results 1. This hypothesis appeared first on Hwalinseo(活人書) in the Song Dynasty, and had lots of impact on future generations. 2. After passing Song, Yuan, and Ming Dynasty, there were some opinions appeared which criticized part of this hypothesis. Dongeuibogam(東醫寶鑑) also tried to correct this hypothesis. 3. Bang Yu-Jip(方有執) of Ming Dynasty straightly opposed this hypothesis on Sanghanronjobyeon(傷寒論條辨)for the first time. It had huge influence in the Qing Dynasty and lots of scholars suggested that this hypothesis lacks persuasion. 4. Just like Qing Dynasty, this hypothesis is not accepted in the books of modern ages. Conclusion This hypothesis appeared in the Song Dynasty for the first time and had lots of influence, but some counter arguments had appeared as time passed, and during Qing Dynasty, this hypothesis lost its creditibility with lots of criticism.

Keywords

References

  1. 김동희 외 15인. 현대상한론. 용인, 한의문화사. 2000: 47, 49, 63-65, 67, 105.
  2. 蔡仁植. 傷寒論譯詮. 서울, 高文社. 2000: 17,41.
  3. 성백효. 懸吐完譯 小學集註. 서울, 傳統文化硏究會. 2013: 116.
  4. 許浚. 東醫寶鑑. 서울, 南山堂. 1998: 380.
  5. 李梴. 編註醫學入門. 서울, 南山堂. 2007: 1110,1294, 1297.
  6. 嚴世芸. 國譯中醫學術史. 고양시, 대성의학사. 2011: 397-420, 636-646, 779-807.
  7. 朱肱. 增注類證活人書. 서울, 南山堂. 1987:159.
  8. 柯琴. 懸吐完譯 柯氏傷寒論注. 대전, 주민출판사. 1999: 47, 102.
  9. 成無已. 懸吐完譯 注解傷寒論. 서울, 주민출판사. 2012: 126.
  10. 成無已. 懸吐完譯 傷寒明理論. 서울. 주민출판사. 2006: 10.
  11. 白石佳正. 圖說傷寒論. 서울, 전파과학사. 2006: 18.
  12. 大塚敬節. 傷寒論解說. 서울, 書苑堂. 2001:186.
  13. 熊曼琪. 傷寒論. 北京, 人民衛生出版社. 2002:41.
  14. 李培生. 柯氏傷寒論注疏正. 北京, 人民衛生出 版社. 1996: 74.
  15. 劉建平 외 3인. 傷寒雜病論. 石家莊, 河北科學 技術出版社. 1996: 24.
  16. 聶惠民. 傷寒論講義. 北京, 學苑出版社. 2000:9, 22.
  17. 許叔微. 許叔微醫學全書.傷寒百證歌. 北京, 中國中醫藥出版社. 2006: 12, 20.
  18. 錢聞禮. 傷寒百問歌. 北京, 人民衛生出版社. 1960: 45.
  19. 郭雍. 傷寒補亡論. 長沙, 湖南科學技術出版社. 2013: 138.
  20. 朱丹溪. 朱丹溪醫學全書.丹溪手鏡. 北京, 中國中醫藥出版社. 2006: 255.
  21. 王履. 醫經溯洄集. 上海, 上海浦江敎育出版社. 2011: 26.
  22. 劉純. 劉純醫學全書.傷寒治例. 北京, 中國中醫藥出版社. 1999: 506.
  23. 方有執. 傷寒論條辨. 北京, 學苑出版社. 2009:18.
  24. 喩嘉言. 喩嘉言醫學全書.尙論篇. 北京, 中國中醫藥出版社. 2003: 20.
  25. 李中梓. 李中梓醫學全書.傷寒括要. 北京, 中國中醫藥出版社. 1999: 313.
  26. 張璐. 張璐醫學全書.傷寒緖論. 北京, 中國中醫藥出版社. 1999: 714.
  27. 張璐. 張璐醫學全書.傷寒纘論. 北京, 中國中醫藥出版社. 1999: 559.
  28. 魏荔彤. 傷寒論本義. 北京, 中醫古籍出版社. 1997: 172.
  29. 吳謙. 禦纂醫宗金鑑.訂正傷寒論注. 北京, 人民衛生出版社. 2009: 29.
  30. 吳謙. 禦纂醫宗金鑑.傷寒心法要訣. 北京, 人民衛生出版社. 2009: 447.
  31. 邵成平. 傷寒正醫錄. 北京, 中醫古籍出版社. 2012: 85.
  32. 黃元御. 黃元御醫學全書.傷寒懸解. 北京, 中國中醫藥出版社. 1999: 460.
  33. 沈金鰲. 沈金鰲醫學全書.傷寒論綱目. 北京, 中國中醫藥出版社. 1999: 654.
  34. 徐大椿. 徐大椿醫學全書.傷寒類方. 北京, 人民衛生出版社. 2001: 169.
  35. 朱文鋒, 袁肇凱. 中醫診斷學. 北京, 人民衛生出版社. 2013: 32.
  36. 김강. 桂枝湯 方後註文에 관한 硏究. 한국의사학회지. 2010; 23(1): 23-41.
  37. 방정균. 傷寒論의 "中風"과 "傷寒"에 대한 考察. 대한한의학원전학회지. 2006; 19(4): 136-146.