DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Effects of Science Lessons using Six Thinking Hats techniques on Creativity and Science Academic Achievement

육색사고기법을 활용한 과학수업이 창의성 및 과학 학업성취도에 미치는 효과

  • Received : 2014.03.18
  • Accepted : 2014.04.29
  • Published : 2014.04.30

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine the effects on the effects of science lessons using six thinking hats techniques on creativity and science academic achievement. To verify the research problem, the subject of this study was fourth-grade students selected from four classes of an elementary school located in Busan. For ten weeks, the experimental group of 40 students was taught using the six thinking hats techniques. The comparative group also of 40 students, was taught in normal classes which used a Text-book. Children were given a creativity test and academic achievement test in science to measure the effects on six thinking hats techniques. Likert scales were used to gather students feedbacks on creativity and science academic achievement. Through these procedures, the following results were obtained: First, the six thinking hats techniques had a more effect on creativity than the normal classes, where a text-book was used. Second, the six thinking hats techniques could be seen to be effective in improving the student's academic achievements in science than the normal classes which used a Text-book. Third, the result of the student recognition investigation, we could know that the students showed lots of interest in the science lessons using six thinking hats techniques, and they were able to understand the scientific theories. As a result, the elementary science class with six thinking hats techniques had the effects of developing creativity and science academic achievement. It means the science class with six thinking hats techniques has potential possibilities and value to develop creativity and science academic achievement.

Keywords

References

  1. Kang Woo Seok(2012). The Effects of Utilization of Creative Technique on Scientific Motivation and Science Academic Achievement tin Elementary Science Class. master's Thesis, Busan National University of Education.
  2. Ministry of Education(2011). Received Elementary School Teacher's Science Guidebook 5-1. Kumsung Publishing Co, Seoul Korea
  3. Kim Dae Sung, Lee Yong Seob. Effects of Future Problem Solving Program on Creativity and Scientific Attitude. Journal of Korean Earth Education. 5(1), 51-59.
  4. Kim(2006). Effects of mind map activity on science achievement and inquiry ability. master's Thesis, Cheongju National University of Education.
  5. Kim Myung Sook(1998). Effects of the Types of Creativity Training Program and the Related Variables on the Improvement of Creativity. Ph. D. Dissertation, Sungkyunkwan University.
  6. Kim Bo Mi(2012). The Exploration of the Elementary Science Class using the SCAMPER : Focusing on Dissolution. master's Thesis, Gwangju National University of Education..
  7. Kim Sang Dal, Kim Eun Jung, Ju Cook Young, Choi Sung Bong, Hong Dong Gyoon(2008). The Effects of High School Earth Science Instruction Using Mind Map. Korean Earth Science Society, 29(7), 617-625. https://doi.org/10.5467/JKESS.2008.29.7.617
  8. Kim Young Joo(2002). The Stimulating of Creativity in Gifted Children Through The Use of a Formulated Brainstorming Program. master's Thesis, Incheon National University of Education.
  9. Kim Yong Kwon, Shin Sang Soon, Lee Seok Hee(2004). The Effects of Concept Mapping Activity on Science Achievement and Attitude. Korean Society of Elementary Science Education, 23(3), 208-218.
  10. Kim Chan Ki(2004). The effects of Creativity Training Program on Science Process Skills. master's Thesis, Busan National University of Education.
  11. Kim Cheon Sik(2007). The Effects of Application of Program for Science Classes with Creativity in the Elementary School. master's Thesis, Daegu National University of Education.
  12. Kim Ho Jin(2009). The influences of creative thinking skills on the degree of studies achievement in social studies class of elementary school. master's Thesis, Gwangju National University of Education.
  13. Ryu Eun Joo(2011). The effect of children's notable picture appreciation using the six thinking hats on their creativity and abilities of verbal expression and art appreciation. master's Thesis, Pukyong National University.
  14. Kim Nam Il, Ryu Ho Cheon, Kang Tae Won(1999).The Effects of Science Learning Activities with Mind Mapping on the Children's Science Achievement and Creativity Development. Korean Society of Biology Education, 27(3), 177-184.
  15. Park Mi Ja(2011). Lesson Plan of Language class competition of Busan Metropolitan City Office of Education. Anjin Elementary School.
  16. Park Mi Jin, Lee Yong Seob(2010). Effective Educational Use of Thinking Maps in Science Instruction. Korean Earth Science Society, 3(1), 47-54.
  17. Park Ju Young(2008). Six thinking hats : the theory and its application. master's Thesis, Kyungpook National University.
  18. Song Hyun Hwa(2014). The Effects of Lesson Using the Creative thinking Techniques on Science Process Skills and Creativity. master's Thesis, Busan National University of Education.
  19. Lee Young Mi(2012). The effect of the children integrated creativity program: school adjustment, academic achievement and creativity among elementary school children. Korean Society of Child Education. 21(2), 213-232.
  20. Lee Wan Seok(2007). The Effects of Science Classes by Application of Creative Thought Techniques on Elementary School Children's Creativity. master's Thesis, Daegu National University of Education.
  21. Lee Hun Sung(2013). The effects of creative thinking techniques on Science Academic Achievement of 4th graders. master's Thesis, Korea National University of Education.
  22. Cho Youn Soon, Sung Jin Sook, Lee Hye Ju(2008). Creativity in education-Development of creative problem solving and teaching methods. Ewha Women's University Press.
  23. Cha Ju Yeon(2005). The effect that study applied with the six thinking hats skill influences on children creativity and language expression ability. master's Thesis, Busan National University.
  24. Choi Jung O(2007). Initiative Heigh Effect Analysis of Science Class That Apply Original Thinking Technique. master's Thesis, Korea International Culture University.
  25. Choi Hye Kyung(2013). The effects of utilization of creative technique on creativity and science attitudes in elementary science class. master's Thesis, Korea National University of Education.
  26. Han Ki Soon(2000). Investigation of Domain-specificity and Domain-generality of Creativity in Young Children . Journal of Gifted/Talented Education, 10(2), 47-69.
  27. Hyun Jin Sub(2001). A Study on Domain-specificity of creativity. master's Thesis, Sook Myung Women's University.
  28. Amabile, T. M. (1983). The Social psychology of creativity: New York: Springer-Verlag.
  29. Baer, J. (1993). Why you shouldn't trust creativity tests. Educational Leadership, 51, 80-83.
  30. Beghetto, R. A. (2010). Creativity in the classroom. In J. C. Kaufman & R. J. Sternberg(Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of creativity. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  31. Brown, R. T. (1989). Creativity: What are we to measure? In J. A. Glover, R. R. Ronning, & C. R. Reynolds(Eds.), Handbook of creativity( 3-32). New York: Plenum.
  32. Cropley, A. J. (1999). Education. In M. A. Runco & S. R. Pritzker (eds.), Encyclopedia of creativity: Vol. 1(pp. 629-642). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
  33. Guilford, J. P. (1959). Three faces of intellect. American Psychologist, Vol( 14) 469-479. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0046827
  34. Hennessey, B. A. & Amabile, T. M. (1988). The conditions of creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), The nature of creativity: Contemporary psychological perspectives (pp. 11-42). New York : Cambridge University Press.
  35. Milgram, R. M. (1990). Creativity: An idea whose time has come and gone? In M. A. Runco., & R. S. Albert. (Eds.), Theories of creativity. London: Sage.
  36. Mumford, M. D. & Gustafson, S. B. (1988). Creativity syndrom: integration, application, and Innovation. Psychological bulletin, 103(10), 27-43. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.103.1.27
  37. Osborn, A. F. & Parnes, S. J. (1963). Applied imagination, principles and procedures of creative problem-solving(3rd Edition). NY: Chares Scribbler's Son.
  38. Runco, M. A. & Nemiro, J. (1994). Problem finding, creativity, and giftedness. Roeper Review, 16(4), 235-240. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783199409553588
  39. Torrance, E. P. (1972). Career patterns and peak creative achievements of creative high school students twelve years later. Gifted Child Quarterly, 16, 75-88. https://doi.org/10.1177/001698627201600201