Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society (한국산학기술학회논문지)

The Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society (한국산학기술학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on Securing Ship Survivability focused on a Cost and Effectiveness Analysis for Air Defense Performance

대공방어성능에 대한 비용효과분석을 중심으로 한 함정생존성 확보방안 연구

  • Received : 2014.01.07
  • Accepted : 2014.05.08
  • Published : 2014.05.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

It is crucial to set up early the required performance of surface ship for preventing the risk factors such as an excess of performance, cost and period in development stage. In this study, MOP and MOE are proposed to establish the method for deriving alternatives, MOP represents the defensive effect for anti ship missiles and MOE is the ratio of cost and performance. The 16 engagement scenarios which selectively install RF decoy, RF jammer, CIWS and anti air missile are suggested. The simulation results by using NORAM tool operated by ROK Navy show that the ship survivability is 0.605~0.975 and MOP is 0.301~0.887. The analyzed results represent the operating scenario with RF decoy, RF jammer and short range anti air missile is the best cost and effectiveness measure.

수상 전투함의 개발과정에서 성능, 비용, 기간 등의 초과와 같은 위험요소를 방지하기 위해서는 요구성능을 조기에 설정하는 과정이 필요하다. 본 연구에서는 요구성능 설정의 기준자료로 활용할 수 있는 성능척도와 비용효과척도를 제안하였으며, 성능척도는 대함유도탄 방어 효과를 나타내었고, 비용효과척도는 비용과 성능의 비율로 구성하였다. 성능척도와 비용효과척도를 적용한 분석결과를 구하기 위해 RF기만기, RF재머, 근접방어무기체계, 요격용유도탄을 선택 탑재하는 16가지의 교전 시나리오를 작성하였다. 해군에서 운용하고 있는 NORAM 프로그램을 활용하여 교전을 모의분석한 결과, 함정의 생존확률은 0.605~0.975, 비용효과척도는 0.301~0.887로 분석되었으며, RF기만기, RF재머, 단거리요격용유도탄 등 3종류의 방어무기를 동시에 운용하는 경우가 가장 우수한 비용효과를 나타내고 있음을 알 수 있었다.

Keywords

References

  1. Robin Brouwer,"A Framework for System Engineering in Ship Design from a NATO Specialist Team Perspective", 2008
  2. Department of Defense, "System Engineering Fundamentals", Dec. 2000
  3. Brown, A. J. and Juan Salsedo, "Multiple-Objective Optimization in Naval Ship Design", ASNE 2002
  4. Justin Stepanchick and Brown, A. J., "Revisiting DDGX/DDG-51 Concept Exploration", Naval Engineering Journal, Vol. 119, No. 3, pp. 67-88, 2007 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-3584.2007.00069.x
  5. Brown, A. J., "Multiple-Objective Optimization in Naval Ship Concept Design", Marine Systems and Technology 2010 Conference, Nov. 2010
  6. Schulte J. C., "An Analysis of the Historical Effectiveness of Antiship Cruise missiles in Littoral Warfare", Naval Postgrauate School 1994
  7. Ball R. E., "The Fundamentals of Aircraft Combat Survivability Analysis and Design", AIAA education series], 2003
  8. Roy M. Smith, "Using Kill-Chain Analysis to Develop Surface Ship CONOPS to Defend against Anti-Ship Cruise Missiles", Naval Postgrauate School 2010
  9. Dean, A. Rains, "A System Engineering Approach to Surface Combatant Design Issues", Naval Engineers Jouranal, pp. 228-239, May 1990
  10. Hockberger William A., "Total Ship Design in a Supersystem Framework", Naval Engineers Journal May 1996 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-3584.1996.tb01558.x
  11. John C. Hootman and Cliff Whitcomb, "A Military Effectiveness Analysis and Decision Making Framework for Naval Ship Design and Acquisition", Naval Engineers Journal Summer 2005 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-3584.2005.tb00360.x
  12. Corey Kerns, Alan Brown and David Woodward, "Application of a DoDAF Total-Ship System Architecture in Building a Design Reference Mission for Assessing Naval Ship Operation Effectiveness", ASNE Global Deterrence and Defense Symposium Sep. 2011
  13. ISO/IEC, System Engineering System Life Cycle Processes", ISO/IEC15288, 2002
  14. Buede, Dennis,"A Primer for Model-Based System Engineering", Vitech Corporation, Feb. 2011
  15. Ball R. E. and Calvino C. N., "Establishing the Fundamentals of a Surface Ship Survivability Design Displine", Naval Engineers Journal, pp. 71-74, January 1994 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-3584.1994.tb02798.x
  16. Steven Loke Yew Kok, "Naval Survivability and Susceptibility Reduction Study", Naval Postgrauate School 2012
  17. "Survivability Policy and Standards for Surface Ships and Craft of US Navy", OPNAVINST 9070.1A Sep. 2012
  18. Ronald S. Bush and Arthur E. Cimiluca, "Tradeoff Analysis Model for Arsenal Ship Survivability and Sustainability", Naval Postgrauate School 1996
  19. Capt. Wayne P. Hughes Jr. USN(Ret.), "Fleet Tactics and Coastal Combat", 2nd edition USN Institute 2000
  20. The Naval Institute Guide to World Naval Weapons System 1997-1998
  21. FMS: Autralia Requests 2009 AEGIS Combat System Components
  22. Modern Day Military Pricing List-Nation Creation Wiki
  23. Calvano, C. N., Berner J. M., Bradley J. K., Torsiello K. A., Hooker D. T., Merrill C. F., "Large Capacity Missile Carrier(CMX)", Naval Postgrauate School 1993.