The Mathematical Education (한국수학교육학회지시리즈A:수학교육)

Korean Society of Mathematical Education (한국수학교육학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A study on creative product semantic scale in mathematics

수학 영역에서 창의적 산출물 의미 척도

  • Hong, Juyeun (Graduate School, Gyeongsang National University) ;
  • Han, Inki (Department of Mathematics Education, Gyeongsang National University)
  • Received : 2014.04.26
  • Accepted : 2014.05.19
  • Published : 2014.05.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study has to do with creative product in mathematics. We analyze Taylor's creative product according to a different developmental level of creativity, Taylor's creative product inventory, Besemer & Treffinger's creative products analysis matrix, O'Quin & Besemer's creative products semantic scale(CPSS) etc. The purpose of this study is to make creative products semantic scale in mathematics. O'Quin & Besemer's CPSS consists of 55 items, bipolar adjective checklist. We confirm that O'Quin & Besemer's CPSS is not fit to use for mathematics creative products. So we develop Creative Product Semantic Scale in Mathematics(MCPSS) which consists of 33 items, bipolar adjective checklist. Our result will provide convenience to mathematics teacher who guides a student make a creative product.

Keywords

References

  1. 강완 (2013). 수학적 능력의 구조와 수학 영재아를 위한 창의적 문제 해결 지도 방안, 2013국제수학영재교육학술대회 프로시딩, 7-14. Kang, W. (2013). A stucture of the mathematical ability and a teaching method of the creative problem solving for a mathematically gifted student, Proceedings of the 2013 International Conf. on Math. Edu., 7-14.
  2. 교육과학기술부 (2011). 수학과 교육과정, 서울: 교육과학기술부.
  3. 권오남, 김정효 (2000). 창의적 문제해결력 중심의 수학교육과정 적용 및 효과 분석, 수학교육 39(2), 81-99. Gwon, O.N. & Kim, J.H. (2000). Application and examination the effect of mathematics curriculum to enhance creative problem solving abilities, The Mathematical Education 39(2), 81-99.
  4. 김기영, 김성수, 이용구, 김현중 (2010). 다변량 분석 입문, 서울: 한국방송통신대학교 출판부. Kim, K.Y., Kim, S.S., Lee, Y.G. & Kim, H.J. (2010). A Introduction to multivariate analysis, Seoul: KNOU-Press.
  5. 김대업 (2009). AMOS A to Z : 논문작성절차에 따른 구조방정식 모형분석, 경기도: 학현사. Kim, D.U. (2009). AMOS A to Z: structure equation model analysis by paper procedure of writing up, Gyeonggi-do:Hakhyunsa.
  6. 김석우 (2010). 사회과학 연구를 위한 SPSS.AMOS 활용의 실제, 서울: 학지사. Kim, S.W. (2010). A actual utilization with SPSS.AMOS for a study of social sciences, Seoul: Hakjisa.
  7. 김선희 (2005). 수학사에 근거한 수학영재의 창의적 산출물 평가 준거 개발, 한국수학사학회지 18(2), 75-94. Kim S.H. (2005). Development of the Evaluation Criterion for Mathematically Gifted Students Creative Product in View of Mathematical History, Journal for History of Mathematics 18(2), 75-94.
  8. 김수경, 김은진, 권혁진, 한혜숙 (2012). 수학 영재의 창의적 문제해결 모델(MG-CPS)을 일반학생의 수학 학습에 적용한 사례연구, 수학교육 51(4), 351-375. Kim, S.K., Kim, E.J., Gwon, H.J. & Han, H.S. (2012). A case study on the effects of mathematically gifted creative problem solving model in mathematics learning for ordinary students, The Mathematical Education 51(4), 351-375. https://doi.org/10.7468/mathedu.2012.51.4.351
  9. 김영봉, 강병재, 권순희, 김희대, 문태순, 변종임, 심형진 (2005). 교육학 개론, 경기도: 서현사. Kim, Y.B., Kang, B.J., Kwon, S.H., Kim, H.D., Moon, T.S., Byun, J.I., Shim, H.J. (2005). Introduction to education, Gyeonggi-do: Seohyeonsa.
  10. 김용대 (2004). 창의적 문제해결과 문제변형을 위한 사고, 수학교육 43(4), 399-404. Kim, Y,D. (2004). Thinking for creative problem solving and problem posing, The Mathematical Education 43(4), 399-404.
  11. 남영신 (2003). 국어대사전, 서울: 성안당. Nam, Y.S. (2003). Korean dictionary, Seoul: Sungandang.
  12. 심재봉, 이우식 (2000). 다양한 문제분석을 통한 창의적인 문제해결력 신장, 수학교육학술지 5, 175-194. Sim, J.B. & Lee, W. S. (2000). A improvement of creative problem solving abilities by various analysis of problem, Studies in Mathematical Education 5, 175-194.
  13. 양태석 (2011). 지역 교육지원청 창의적 산출물 발표회에 관한 연구, 석사학위논문, 경상대학교. Yang, T.S. (2011). A Study of creative output presentation in district educational office, Master's thesis, Gyeongsang National University.
  14. 우종필 (2014). 우종필 교수의 구조방정식모델 개념과 이해, 서울 : 한나래 출판사. Woo, J.P. (2014). The concept and understanding of structural equation model by professor Woo, Seoul:Hannarae Publishing Co.
  15. 이강섭, 황동주 (2004). 수학 창의적 문제 해결력 검사(MCPSAT)에 대한 중, 고등학교 급별 적합성 분석, 수학교육논문집 18(1), 191-199. Lee, K.S. & Hawng, D.J. (2004). A compatibility analysis each of the middle and high school by Mathematics Creative Problem Solving Ability Test(MCPSAT), Communications of mathematical education 18(1), 191-199.
  16. 이광진 (2011). 중등학교 수학영재교육에서 창의적 산출물의 분석, 석사학위논문, 경상대학교. Lee, K.J. (2011). An analysis of the creative outcomes in the mathematics gifted education of secondary school, Master's thesis, Gyeongsang National University.
  17. 이대현 (1999). 창의적인 문제해결과정에서의 직관과 논리의 역할, 수학교육 38(2), 159-164. Lee, D.H. (1999). The role of intuition and logic in creative problem solving process, The Mathematical Education 38(2), 159-164.
  18. 이명숙, 김미숙, 문은식 (2013). STEAM 수업이 수학영재의 수학 창의적 문제해결력과 창의적 태도에 미치는 효과, 영재와 영재교육 12(3), 75-94. Lee, M.S., Kim, M.S. & Moon. Y.S. (2013). The effect of STEAM instruction on math creative problem solving ability and creative attitude in elementary math gifted students, The Journal of the Korean Society for the Gifted and Talented 12(3), 75-94.
  19. 이종희, 김기연 (2010). 수학영재의 창의적 산출물 평가준거 개발 및 적용, 학교수학 12(3), 301-322. Lee, C.H. & Kim, K.Y. (2010). Development and Application of the Criteria of Evaluating Creative Product in Mathematical Gifted Education, School Mathematics 12(3), 301-322.
  20. 조석희, 황동주 (2007). 중학교 수학 영재 판별을 위한 수학 창의적 문제해결력 검사 개발. 영재교육연구 17(1), 1-26. Jo, S.H. & Hawng, D.J. (2007). Math Creative Problem Solving Ability Test for Identification of the Mathematically Gifted Middle School Students, Journal of Gifted/Talented Education 17(1), 1-26.
  21. 한국언론연구원 (1993). 매스컴대사전, 서울 : 한국언론연구원. The Korean Press Institute (1993). Masscom unabridged dictionary, Seoul : The Korean Press Institute.
  22. Besemer S. P. & Treffinger D. J. (1981). Analysis of creative products: review and synthesis, The Journal of Creative Behavior 15(3), 158-178. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2162-6057.1981.tb00287.x
  23. Besemer S. P. & O'Quin K. (1986). Analyzing creative products: refinement and test of a judging instrument, The Journal of Creative Behavior 20(2), 115-126. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2162-6057.1986.tb00426.x
  24. Besemer S. P. (1998). Creative product analysis matrix: testing the model structure and a comparison among products-three novel chairs, Creativity Research Journal 11(4), 333-346. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326934crj1104_7
  25. Brogden, H. E. & Sprecher T. B. (1964). Criteria of creativity. In C. W. Taylor(Eds.), Creativity progress and potential. NYU: McGraw Hill.
  26. O'Quin K. & Besemer S. P. (1989). The development, reliability, and validity of the revised creative product semantic scale, Creativity Research Journal 2, 267-278. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400418909534323
  27. Taylor I. A. (1975). An emerging view of creative actions. In Taylor I. A. & Getzels J. W.(Eds.), Perspectives in Creativity (297-325).
  28. Young J.G. (1985). What is creativity? The Journal of Creative Behavior 19(2), 77-87. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2162-6057.1985.tb00640.x